Congressional Clean Lakes Collaboration
Dr. McGinnis was involved in the Clean Lakes Study at Lake Allatoona, Georgia and facilitated the creation of a collaborative network of federal, state, regional, and local agencies, and organizations to guide the study. This effort was nationally recognized model of intergovernmental management promoted throughout the U.S. by the U.S. EPA. Analyze the collaborative effort as a model of intergovernmental management. Use only peer reviewed sources including articles from journals, textbooks, theses/dissertations. Including 8- 10 sources not including your Biblical analysis.
Congressional Clean Lakes Collaboration
INSTRUCTIONS • Provide a Biblically based support for your analysis • Sources must be derived from Read items assigned for the Module: Week in which the Case Study is assigned, peer-reviewed journal articles, and your independent research. • All citations and format must be in current APA format • Include 8 – 10 sources, not including your Biblical analysis • Double-spaced, with 1-inch margins, written in 12-point Times New Roman font. • Paper must be 8-10 pages
-
What is the Clean Lakes Study at Lake Allatoona, Georgia?,
-
How did Dr. McGinnis facilitate intergovernmental collaboration for the study?,
-
How is this effort a model of intergovernmental management?,
-
What are the key strengths and challenges of this collaborative approach?,
-
How can a Biblical perspective support intergovernmental collaboration and stewardship of natural resources?
Comprehensive General Answer
1. The Clean Lakes Study at Lake Allatoona
The Clean Lakes Study at Lake Allatoona, Georgia, was initiated under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Clean Lakes Program, a nationwide effort designed to address pollution and water quality degradation in major freshwater lakes. The study aimed to assess the causes of nutrient loading, sedimentation, and water pollution and to develop collaborative management strategies to restore and preserve lake ecosystems. Lake Allatoona, serving as a vital water supply and recreation area, faced growing pressures from urbanization, agricultural runoff, and industrial waste. The project brought together multiple levels of government and community stakeholders to craft a unified response to these challenges.
2. Dr. McGinnis and the Collaborative Network
Dr. McGinnis played a central leadership role in building a collaborative intergovernmental network that included federal, state, regional, and local agencies, as well as nonprofit and community organizations. This network integrated expertise, authority, and resources across sectors to achieve shared goals. The U.S. EPA, Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD), regional development commissions, and local watershed associations coordinated through joint committees and data-sharing agreements.
Dr. McGinnis’s facilitation style emphasized communication, trust-building, and shared governance, where each participant had a voice in decision-making. The Lake Allatoona project became a model of “bottom-up collaboration”—a process that empowered local and regional actors within a federally guided framework. The case demonstrated that successful intergovernmental partnerships require leadership that fosters both accountability and inclusivity.
3. A Model of Intergovernmental Management
The Lake Allatoona collaboration exemplifies an effective model of intergovernmental management, as described in public administration theory. According to Agranoff (2007) and O’Leary & Bingham (2009), intergovernmental management involves cooperative problem-solving across government levels and organizational boundaries to address complex public issues. In this model, coordination replaces command, and influence is exercised through negotiation and mutual benefit rather than hierarchical control.
The Allatoona effort succeeded because it aligned with key principles of intergovernmental collaboration:
-
Shared vision and mutual goals: All participants focused on sustainable lake restoration.
-
Institutionalized coordination: Federal and state agencies provided structure, while regional and local groups provided on-the-ground insight.
-
Resource pooling: Agencies shared data, personnel, and funding streams, maximizing efficiency.
-
Transparency and accountability: Joint meetings and public participation ensured credibility.
This model resonates with the concept of network governance, emphasizing horizontal relationships, information exchange, and adaptive management.