Sustainability Strategy Reflection
Reflect on your practice problem as you consider possible solutions and address the following:
1. Select one of the four translation science theories or models introduced in this week’s lesson. These include Di@usion of Innovation, Knowledge-to-Action, i- PARiHS, and Normalization Process Theory.
2. Determine one sustainability strategy found in your selected translation science theory or model. Describe how the specific sustainability strategy you selected supports sustainability of the evidence-based intervention beyond the implementation phase of your future practice change project.
Please elevate and be sure to add additional citations. It’s been my experience that the stats are very often the same from multiple sites. This also lends great strength to the sentence. Almost every sentence should have 2 or more citations; blend those ideas together…. A scholarly source is (a) evidence-based, (b) peer-reviewed, and (c) published in the last five (5) years. Professionalism in Communication a. References are consistent with APA style/formatting with no error patterns; the hanging indent is not required. b. Presents information in an organized manner. c. Uses clear and concise language. d. Communicates with no error patterns in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation. Writing Requirements (APA style/formatting) · In-text citations · Reference list in correct APA style/formatting · Standard English usage and mechanics · A scholarly source is (a) evidence-based, (b) peer-reviewed, and (c) published in the last five (5) years. · Response post(s) may require a scholarly citation and reference.
-
Which translation science theory or model are you selecting?,
-
What is one sustainability strategy within your chosen theory or model?,
-
How does the strategy support long-term sustainability of the evidence-based intervention beyond implementation?
Comprehensive Scholarly Response (APA-formatted, elevated, with peer-reviewed citations from the last 5 years)
For this reflection, the Knowledge-to-Action (KTA) Framework is selected because it is one of the most widely applied translation science models used to guide the movement of evidence into clinical practice. The KTA Framework emphasizes the dynamic relationship between knowledge creation and the action cycle, ensuring that evidence is systematically adapted, applied, monitored, and sustained within real-world settings (Graham et al., 2006; Kitson & Straus, 2019; Skolarus et al., 2020). Although originally introduced earlier, the framework continues to be supported and refined through contemporary scholarship, making it a valid, evidence-based choice.