The Limits of Science
Based on your viewing of the PBS documentary, The Vaccine Wars, I would like students to discuss the role of science in contemporary society in general, and some of the possible limitations of science in particular. What I certainly want to discourage students from doing is discussing the merits of mandatory vaccinations — that’s an important topic, but one that is slightly out of the parameters of this particular course (this includes the ongoing saga regarding the COVID-19 vaccinations). Rather, it is expected that students will discuss the paradoxical nature of science as an epistemology. Given that this is a course exclusively couched in the rhetoric of science, what are some of the potential pitfalls of science as it is increasingly influencing human behavior (issues of cultural lag)? If possible, please think of some examples of social/criminal justice policy that is based on scientific advancements that our population is unwilling to embrace.
The Limits of Science
-
Discuss the role of science in contemporary society,
-
What are some possible limitations of science?,
-
What are the potential pitfalls of science as it increasingly influences human behavior (issues of cultural lag)?,
-
What examples of social/criminal justice policy based on science are resisted by society?,
-
How does the paradoxical nature of science as an epistemology shape its influence?
General Answer: The Limits of Science
Science plays a critical role in shaping contemporary society by providing systematic methods to generate knowledge, improve healthcare, and inform policy. As highlighted in The Vaccine Wars, scientific progress can enhance quality of life, but its acceptance is not always straightforward. While science offers evidence-based solutions, it does not always align with public beliefs, cultural traditions, or personal values. This creates a paradox: science seeks truth through empirical evidence, yet its impact depends on social acceptance and trust.
One major limitation of science lies in cultural lag—the delay between technological or scientific advancements and society’s ability or willingness to adapt. For instance, genetic testing for criminal investigations, such as DNA databases, has revolutionized law enforcement by increasing accuracy in identifying suspects. However, public concerns about privacy, surveillance, and government overreach have slowed widespread acceptance of these tools. Similarly, advancements in neuroscience that could inform criminal sentencing raise ethical questions about free will and accountability, leading to hesitation in their use. These examples underscore that while science provides powerful tools, its application in society must balance innovation with ethical, cultural, and social considerations.