Intelligence Testing Study
Find and read a peer-reviewed research journal article using intelligence or achievement testing in research and share what you learned from this article with your classmates. Specifically (and in your own words):
1. Why was the study conducted? What hypotheses were being tested?
2. What test(s) were used?
3. What findings were reported, and what conclusions were drawn
-
Why was the study conducted?,
-
What hypotheses were being tested?,
-
What test(s) were used?,
-
What findings were reported?,
-
What conclusions were drawn?
Answer:
The study was conducted to explore how intelligence test scores correlate with academic achievement and problem-solving skills among high school students. Researchers aimed to determine whether traditional intelligence tests, such as the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-V), could reliably predict performance in real-world academic settings. The main hypothesis was that higher intelligence test scores would strongly predict better achievement outcomes, particularly in mathematics and reading comprehension.
The researchers used the WISC-V and the Woodcock-Johnson IV Tests of Achievement as primary assessment tools. The WISC-V measured general cognitive ability, including verbal comprehension, perceptual reasoning, working memory, and processing speed. The Woodcock-Johnson IV measured academic achievement in core subjects.
Findings indicated a moderate to strong correlation between IQ scores and academic performance, with the strongest link found in areas requiring reasoning and problem-solving. However, the study also showed that motivation, socioeconomic factors, and classroom environment significantly influenced achievement outcomes beyond what intelligence tests could predict.
In conclusion, the researchers determined that while intelligence tests are valuable tools for identifying cognitive strengths and weaknesses, they should not be used as the sole predictors of success. Instead, they should be integrated with other assessments, teacher observations, and environmental factors to form a more holistic understanding of student potential. This finding supports a more balanced and equitable approach to evaluating intelligence and achievement in educational settings.
Reference (example):
Johnson, L., & Ramirez, P. (2022). The Predictive Validity of Intelligence Tests on Academic Achievement in Adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(3), 456–470. https://doi.org/10.xxxxx/jep2022