Blog Archives - Page 81 of 465 - Assignment Help Central

May 24, 2025

Doxycycline-PEP Utilization Barriers

By Academic Wizard Blog

Doxycycline-PEP Utilization Barriers

1. Peer-Reviewed

Published in a scholarly journal (not a blog, magazine, or newspaper).

You can check this in databases like CINAHL, PubMed, or FIU Library filters.

2. Relevant to Your Topic

Directly addresses your research focus (e.g., barriers/facilitators to Doxycycline-PEP use).

Avoid articles that only mention your topic in passing.

3. Research-Based Doxycycline-PEP Utilization Barriers

Primary research (RCTs, cohort studies, interviews, etc.) or systematic reviews.

Not just opinion pieces or literature summaries.

4. Published Between 2018–2025

Ensures the evidence is current and relevant. Doxycycline-PEP Utilization Barriers

5. English Language

Unless otherwise allowed by your instructor.

6. Available in Full Text

You must be able to read the entire study (not just the abstract).

Includes sample size, methods, results, and conclusions. In 5 to 10 page.

Shows limitations or recommendations for future research.

Uses APA 7th edition citation format for references.20 ariticles :Required Characteristics of Each Article

1. Peer-Reviewed

Published in a scholarly journal (not a blog, magazine, or newspaper).

You can check this in databases like CINAHL, PubMed, or FIU Library filters.

2. Relevant to Your Topic

Directly addresses your research focus (e.g., barriers/facilitators to Doxycycline-PEP use).

Avoid articles that only mention your topic in passing.

3. Research-Based

Primary research (RCTs, cohort studies, interviews, etc.) or systematic reviews.

Not just opinion pieces or literature summaries.Doxycycline-PEP Utilization Barriers

4. Published Between 2018–2025

Ensures the evidence is current and relevant.,

5. English Language

Unless otherwise allowed by your instructor.,

6. Available in Full Text

You must be able to read the entire study (not just the abstract).,

Includes sample size methods results and conclusions. In 5 to 10 page. ,

Shows limitations or recommendations for future research.,

Uses APA 7th edition citation format for references.20 ariticles, :Required Characteristics of Each Article

1. Peer-Reviewed

Published in a scholarly journal (not a blog, magazine, or newspaper).

You can check this in databases like CINAHL, PubMed, or FIU Library filters.

2. Relevant to Your Topic

Directly addresses your research focus (e.g., barriers/facilitators to Doxycycline-PEP use).

Avoid articles that only mention your topic in passing.

3. Research-Based

Primary research (RCTs, cohort studies, interviews, etc.) or systematic reviews.

Not just opinion pieces or literature summaries.

4. Published Between 2018–2025

Ensures the evidence is current and relevant.

5. English Language

Unless otherwise allowed by your instructor.

6. Available in Full Text

You must be able to read the entire study (not just the abstract).

Includes sample size, methods, results, and conclusions. In 5 to 10 page.

Shows limitations or recommendations for future research.

Uses APA 7th edition citation format for references.

May 23, 2025

Nurse Staffing and Burnout

By Academic Wizard Blog

Nurse Staffing and Burnout

Purpose

The Topic Search Strategy paper is the first of three related assignments. The purpose of this initial paper is to briefly describe your search strategies when identifying two articles that pertain to an evidence-based practice topic of interest.

Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.

1. Examine the sources of knowledge that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO 7)

2. Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 and 8)

Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment. Nurse Staffing and Burnout

Nurse Staffing and Burnout

Total points possible: 120 points

Preparing the assignment:

Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions.

1) Students will be placed into groups by the end of the second week of the session. The groups will work together to select a practice problem of interest as the focus for the three RUA assignments in this course. The practice topic of interest will also be used to complete week 3 and week 5 independent student assignments, as well as a group PowerPoint presentation in week 6.

a. Individuals will complete this assignment independently for weeks 3 and 5.,

b. Teams must assure that members do not use the same articles when completing this assignment.,

c. Please make sure you do not duplicate articles within your group.,

d. Paper should be 3-4 content pages in length., Title and reference pages are required but are excluded from 3-4 -page length.,

2) The paper will include the following sections: Nurse Staffing and Burnout

a. Clinical Question (30 points/25%)

· Describe the problem. What is the focus of your group’s work?

· Explain the significance of the problem in terms of patient outcomes. What health outcomes result from your problem? Or what statistics document this is a problem? You may find support on websites for government or professional organizations.

· PICOT question in support of the group topic.

· State the purpose of your paper. What will your paper do or describe? This is like a problem

statement. “The purpose of this paper is to . . .”

b. Levels of Evidence (20 points/16%)

· Identify the type of question being asked (therapy, prognosis, meaning, etc.).

· What is the best type of evidence to answer that question (e.g., RCT, cohort study, qualitative study, etc.)?

c. Search Strategy (50 points/43%)

· List search terms and results.

· Databases used (start with the CU library). Link your search with the PICOT question described above.

· Refinement decisions. As you did your search, what decisions did you make in refinement to get your required articles down to a reasonable number for review? Were any limits used? If so, what?

· Identification of two (2) most relevant articles (primary sources published within the last 5 years).

d. Format (20 points/16%)

· Correct grammar and spelling.

· Include a title page.

· Use of headings for each section.

· Clinical Question, Levels of Evidence, Search Strategy, and Conclusion

· Adheres to current APA formatting and guidelines.

· 3-4 pages in length, excluding title and reference pages.

For writing assistance, visit the Writing Center.

Please note that your instructor may provide you with additional assessments in any form to determine that you fully understand the concepts learned.

NR449 Evidence-Based Practice

RUA: Topic Search Strategy Guidelines

NR449 Evidence-Based Practice

RUA: Topic Search Strategy Guidelines

NR449_RUA_Topic_Search_Strategy_JUL24 1

Grading Rubric Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment.

Assignment Section and Required Criteria (Points possible/% of total points available)	Highest Level of Performance	High Level of Performance	Satisfactory Level of Performance	Unsatisfactory Level of Performance	Section not present
Clinical Question (30 points/25%)	30 points	26 points	23 points	12 points	0 points
Required criteria 1. Describe the problem. What is the focus of your group’s work? 2. Explain the significance of the problem in terms of patient outcomes. What health outcomes result from your problem? Or what statistics document this is a problem? You may find support on websites for government or professional organizations. 3. PICOT question in support of the group topic. 4. State the purpose of your paper. What will your paper do or describe? This is similar to a problem statement. “The purpose of this paper is to . . .”	Includes 4 requirements.	Includes 3 requirements.	Includes 2 requirements.	Includes 1 requirement.	No requirements for this section presented.
Levels of Evidence (20 points/16%)	20 points	10 points	0 points
Required criteria 1. Identify the type of question being asked (therapy, prognosis, meaning, etc.). 2. What is the best level of evidence to answer that question (e.g., RCT, cohort study, qualitative study, etc.)?	Includes 2 requirements.	Includes 1 requirement.	No requirements for this section presented.
Search Strategy (50 points/43%)	50 points	43 points	38 points	19 points	0 points
Required criteria 1. List search terms and results. 2. Databases used (start with the CU library). Link your search with the PICOT question described above. 3. Refinement decisions. As you did your search, what decisions did you make in refinement to get your required articles down to a reasonable number for review? Were any limits used? If so, what? 4. Identification of two (2) most relevant articles (primary sources published within the last 5 years).	Includes 4 requirements.	Includes 3 requirements.	Includes 2 requirements.	Includes 1 requirement.	No requirements for this section presented.
Organization and APA Style (20 points/16%)	20 points	17 points	15 points	8 points	0 points
Required criteria 1. Correct grammar and spelling. 2. Include a title page. 3. Use of headings for each section. 4. Clinical Question, Levels of Evidence, Search Strategy, and Conclusion 5. Adheres to current APA formatting and guidelines. 6. 3-4 pages in length, excluding title and reference pages.	Includes 6 requirements.	Includes 5 requirements.	Includes 3-4 requirements.	Includes 1-2 requirements.	No requirements for this section presented.
Total Points Possible = 120 points

Picot question

Among nurses working in medical-surgical units, do lower nurse to patient ratios compared to higher ratios affect emotional exhaustion and burnout over a 6-month period?

Sources I chose

González-Gil, M. T., et al. (2025). Impact of Nursing Practice Environments on Work Engagement and Burnout. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(4), 567. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22040567Links to an external site.

Al-Maqbali, M., et al. (2025). Emotional Exhaustion Among Critical Care Nurses and Its Link to Staffing. BMC Nursing, 24, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-01123-4Links to an external site. PMCLinks to an external site.

NR449_RUA_Topic_Search_Strategy_JUL24 1

image1.png

May 23, 2025

Congenital Heart Defect Innovations

By Academic Wizard Blog

Congenital Heart Defect Innovations

· Explain various congenital heart defects, their impact on heart function, and innovations in surgical or medical treatments

Your presentation must:

· Explain the processes or concepts in your own words using references to support your explanations.

· Include all necessary physiology and pathophysiology in your explanation.

· Use detailed explanations with master’s level terminology to teach or explain. Your classmates and professional colleagues are your audience.

· Include audio narration with at least one type of visual aid in your presentation, such as PowerPoint slides, diagrams, whiteboard use, etc.

· Use APA format to style your visual aids and cite your sources.

· Cite at least two references verbally or with on-screen citations. You may cite your e-text as a source.

· Include a reference list in your visual aid or at the end of your slide set.

POWERPOINT

Cardiovascular System:

· Explain various congenital heart defects, their impact on heart function, and innovations in surgical or medical treatments

Your presentation must:

· Explain the processes or concepts in your own words using references to support your explanations.

· Include all necessary physiology and pathophysiology in your explanation.

· Use detailed explanations with master’s level terminology to teach or explain. Your classmates and professional colleagues are your audience.

· Include audio narration with at least one type of visual aid in your presentation, such as PowerPoint slides, diagrams, whiteboard use, etc.

· Use APA format to style your visual aids and cite your sources.

· Cite at least two references verbally or with on-screen citations. You may cite your e-text as a source.

· Include a reference list in your visual aid or at the end of your slide set.

POWERPOINT

Cardiovascular System:

· Explain various congenital heart defects, their impact on heart function, and innovations in surgical or medical treatments

Your presentation must:

· Explain the processes or concepts in your own words using references to support your explanations. ,

· Include all necessary physiology and pathophysiology in your explanation.,

· Use detailed explanations with master’s level terminology to teach or explain. ,Your classmates and professional colleagues are your audience.Congenital Heart Defect Innovations.,

· Include audio narration with at least one type of visual aid in your presentation, such as PowerPoint slides, diagrams, whiteboard use, etc.

· Use APA format to style your visual aids and cite your sources. Congenital Heart Defect Innovations

· Cite at least two references verbally or with on-screen citations. You may cite your e-text as a source.

· Include a reference list in your visual aid or at the end of your slide set.

May 23, 2025

Psychiatric Clinical SMART Goals

By Academic Wizard Blog

Psychiatric Clinical SMART Goals

For this assignment, you will work on setting goals for yourself using the SMART method. You will find an explanation of this method in the module that will guide you in your goal-setting process. You will list a minimum of five professional goals that you would like to accomplish during the clinical experience in this term. For each goal, you must provide an explanation of how the goal is representative of each of the SMART characteristics: Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, Timely. Be sure to answer the following questions for each goal summary: Can you measure it? Is it attainable? Is it realistic? What is the time frame you have set for completing that goal?

Your goals must be related to Psychiatry. This is very important!

SMART Goals

For this assignment, you will work on setting goals for yourself using the SMART method. You will find an explanation of this method in the module that will guide you in your goal-setting process., You will list a minimum of five professional goals that you would like to accomplish during the clinical experience in this term., For each goal you must provide an explanation of how the goal is representative of each of the SMART characteristics:, Specific Measurable Attainable Realistic Timely., Be sure to answer the following questions for each goal summary:, Can you measure it? Is it attainable? Is it realistic?, What is the time frame you have set for completing that goal?,

Format: Each goal summary should be at least 100 words – totaling 500 words for this assignment (added to the speaker notes). The presentation is original work and logically organized, formatted, and cited in the current APA style, including citation of references. The presentation should consist of 10-15 slides (excluding the introduction and reference page).  Psychiatric Clinical SMART Goals

How to Format a PowerPoint Presentation in APA StyleLinks to an external site. Goodwin University. (2019, October). APA style – 7th edition. https://goodwin.libguides.com/c.php?g=29109&p=7298502

This Assignment must be submitted to Turnitin. Psychiatric Clinical SMART Goals

SMART Goals Rubric
Criteria	Ratings	Points
Specific To set a specific goal you must answer the 6 Ws: Who? Who is involved? What? What would I like to accomplish? Where? Where is this happening? When? When do I start/finish? Which? Identify requirements and constraints Why? Why am I doing this? Specific reasons, purpose or benefits!	Exemplary – 6-8 points The goal is personal and identifies areas of weakness in clinical practice. The goal is detailed and clearly focused on the specific skills, behaviors, and/or knowledge outlined in the course objectives.	Distinguished – 4-5 points The goal is personal and identifies areas of weakness in clinical practice. There is a lack of focus and detail on the specific skills, behaviors, and/or knowledge outlined in the course objectives.	Developing – 1-3 points The goal is personal and identifies areas of weakness in clinical practice. Details on the specific skills, behaviors and/or knowledge outlined in the course objectives are not provided.	Novice – 0 points The goal is general and does not address areas of weakness in clinical practice. The goal displays no specificity, is general and vague.	8 points
Measurable Goals may have several short-term and on-going measurements so that you can see how you are doing in your aim to achieve your goal. A non-measurable goal: I want to learn how to sing. A measurable goal: I want to learn 5 arias by Friday, November 12th	Exemplary – 6-8 points Measures have been identified that will demonstrate learning, results, and/or progress as related to the described goal.	Distinguished – 4-5 points A method of measuring has been identified but it does not directly link to or connect with the described go.	Developing – 1-3 points The method listed for measurement is rather general and does not directly link to or connect with the described goal.	Novice – 0 points Not at all measurable – no method of measurement indicated.	8 points
Achievable/Ambitious A goal should stretch you slightly so you feel you can do it, and it will need a real commitment from you. Think about what is achievable and what you want to do.	Exemplary – 6-8 points The goal set forth is realistic, motivating, challenging, and can be achievable within the term. There is a clear process described to support achievability.	Distinguished – 4-5 points The goal set forth is realistic; however, the achievability may not require much challenge, or the achievability may be incredibly challenging to achieve within the term. The process is mentioned but lacks clarity.	Developing – 1-3 points The goal is realistic, however the time frame does not support success. There is no process that supports achievability.	Novice – 0 points The goal is not at all within reason and cannot be achieved.	8 points
Relevant Realistic goals should have you push you, but not break you!	Exemplary – 6-8 points The goal has a strong connection to the course objectives, the student’s history, current interests, and/or demonstrated abilities.	Distinguished – 4-5 points The goal has some connection to the course objectives, the student’s history, current interests and/or demonstrated abilities.	Developing – 1-3 points The goal has only a slight connection to the course objectives, the student’s history, current interests and/or demonstrated abilities.	Novice – 0 points The goal has no connection to the course objectives.	8 points
Timely What is your time frame? Putting an end to your goal, or target dates to work towards, gives you a sense of accomplishment as you move toward achieving your goal. With a time frame comes more commitment to achievement!	Exemplary – 8-9 points The goal has a definite date of what will be accomplished by this date and is linked to the measurables. Is within the time frame of this term.	Distinguished – 6-7 points The goal has an indefinite date of what will be accomplished by this date and is linked to the measurables. It is within the time frame of this term.	Developing – 1-5 points The goal has an indefinite date of what will be accomplished by this date but does not link to the measurables.	Novice – 0 points Has no dates and/or is over a period far beyond this term.	8 points
Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines	Exemplary – 4-5 points References page contains more than required current scholarly academic reference and text reference.. Follows APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent. Rules of grammar, usage and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.	Distinguished – 3 points References page contains one current scholarly academic resource and text reference. Follows most APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent. Few grammatical errors, but sentences could be clearer and more precise.	Developing – 1-2 points References page contains one current or outdated scholarly academic resource. Many errors of APA guidelines: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent. Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.	Novice – 0 points References page contains no current scholarly academic resources, only internet webpages or no reference page. Lack of APA guidelines for references provided. Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.	5 points
PowerPoint Slides	Exemplary – 4-5 points PowerPoint presentation contains 10-15 slides. All parts of the assignment are completed fully and described in the PowerPoint presentation in detail.	Distinguished – 3 points PowerPoint presentation contains 10-15 slides. All parts of the project are completed partially and described in the PowerPoint presentation.	Developing – 1-2 points PowerPoint presentation contains fewer than 10 slides, or some slides are incomplete or not relevant to the required content of the presentation.	Novice – 0 points PointPoint presentation contains fewer than 10 slides and /or is missing several parts of the required content.	5 points
Total Points	50

SMART Goals Rubric

Criteria Psychiatric Clinical SMART Goals

Points

Specific

view longer description

Exemplary

The goal is personal and identifies areas of weakness in clinical practice. The goal is detailed and clearly focused on the specific skills, behaviors, and/or knowledge outlined in the course objectives

5.1 to 8 pts

Distinguished

The goal is personal and identifies areas of weakness in clinical practice. There is a lack of focus and detail on the specific skills, behaviors, and/or knowledge outlined in the course objectives

3.1 to 5 pts

Developing

The goal is personal and identifies areas of weakness in clinical practice. Details on the specific skills, behaviors and/or knowledge outlined in the course objectives are not provided.

0.1 to 3 pts

Novice

The goal is general and does not address areas of weakness in clinical practice. The goal displays no specificity, is general and vague.

0 pts

/8 pts

Measureable

view longer description

Exemplary Psychiatric Clinical SMART Goals

Measures have been identified that will demonstrate learning, results, and/or progress as related to the described goal.

5.1 to 8 pts

Distinguished

A method of measuring has been identified but it does not directly link to or connect with the described go.

3.1 to 5 pts

Developing

The method listed for measurement is rather general and does not directly link to or connect with the described goal

0.1 to 3 pts

Novice

Not at all measurable – no method of measurement indicated

May 23, 2025

Type 2 Diabetes Management

By Academic Wizard Blog

Type 2 Diabetes Management

For this assignment, you will select a disease of your choice and conduct a detailed analysis of that disease, exploring it from a balanced traditional and alternative health perspective. Begin by searching the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) website Diseases and Conditions Index to choose a disease or condition of interest to you.

Next, review the website for Healthy People 2020Links to an external site.

for information related to the disease or the disease category (e.g., mental health for ADHD).

In your paper, discuss the following:

· Prominent aspects of this disease

· Current data and statistics related to the disease Type 2 Diabetes Management

· Health disparities related to the disease

· Prevention strategies including complementary and alternative health therapies

· Contemporary research and clinical studies related to the disease Type 2 Diabetes Management

· An analysis of the pathophysiologic effects of stress related to the disease

· Evidence-based stress management interventions that might help with prevention or cure

The paper should be 3 to 4 pages.

Incorporate at least three scholarly sources within the paper. Sources should be no more than three years old.

A 3- to 4-page paper

Details:

Next, review the website for Healthy People 2020Links to an external site.

for information related to the disease or the disease category (e.g., mental health for ADHD).

In your paper, discuss the following:

· Prominent aspects of this disease

· Current data and statistics related to the disease.,

· Health disparities related to the disease.,

· Prevention strategies including complementary and alternative health therapies.,

· Contemporary research and clinical studies related to the disease.,

· An analysis of the pathophysiologic effects of stress related to the disease .,

· Evidence-based stress management interventions that might help with prevention or cure.,

The paper should be 3 to 4 pages.

Incorporate at least three scholarly sources within the paper. Sources should be no more than three years old.

May 23, 2025

Positive Classroom Behavior Strategies

By Academic Wizard Blog

Positive Classroom Behavior Strategies

Take some time now to answer the following questions. Please note that the IRIS Center does not collect your Assessment responses. If this is a course assignment, you should turn them in to your professor using whatever method he or she requires. If you have trouble answering any of the questions, go back and review the Perspectives & Resources pages in this module.

Identify and briefly discuss two things educators should understand about student behavior.
Briefly describe the ABC model.
Identify and briefly discuss the two ways in which antecedents influence student behavior.
You learned about three types of consequences.
1. List the three types of consequences and briefly explain how each type can be used to change student behavior. Positive Classroom Behavior Strategies
2. Explain why using reinforcement should be an educator’s primary strategy for changing behavior in the classroom. Positive Classroom Behavior Strategies
Read the scenario below and analyze the student’s behavior in relation to the reinforcement.Cooper is a very social fifth grader who enjoys interacting with his peers and teachers. For the most part, Cooper positively engages in various class activities. However, when the teacher poses questions to the class, he frequently calls out, interrupts, and speaks over his classmates—even after receiving multiple reminders to raise his hand and wait patiently. When Cooper acts out the teacher quickly acknowledges his response before asking the student who was called on to repeat the answer.,
1. Using the table below identify Cooper’s behavior as well as the antecedent and consequence that may be influencing his behavior. Antecedent Behavior Consequence .,
2. Discuss the features of reinforcement that you think are increasing the likelihood of Cooper’s disruptive behavior.,
3. Describe how the teacher can adjust the reinforcement to assist Cooper in unlearning the disruptive behavior and learning the desired behavior. (i.e. raising his hand and waiting patiently).,
4. Describe at least two ways in which the teacher could determine that Cooper’s desired behavior has been generalized.,

May 23, 2025

Digital Transformation in Education

By Academic Wizard Blog

Digital Transformation in Education

As a scholar, practitioner, and leader in research design, you will need an understanding of basic and applied research methods and how to construct methodological concepts appropriate to research methods

For this assessment, you will consider appropriate design options for your research plan.

Assessment Deliverable

Create a 16-slide presentation that outlines the research options for your potential dissertation research. Include the following in your presentation:

Slide 1: Title Slide

Title of your presentation, your name, course, and date.

Slides 2–3: Introduction

Provide an overview of your program of study and the selected topic you are considering researching for your dissertation.

State the purpose of your analysis (to identify and compare qualitative and quantitative research characteristics, research designs, and their justifications).

Speaker Notes: Introduce yourself and your program of study, and explain why understanding research methods and designs is critical in your field.

Slides 4–6: Characteristics of Quantitative Research

Summarize the quantitative research article.

Explain the characteristics that make the study quantitative, including:

Structured data collection (e.g., surveys, experiments, measurements).

Numeric data and statistical analysis.

Deductive reasoning and hypothesis testing.

Highlight specific examples from the article (e.g., types of variables, data collection methods, sample size).

Speaker Notes: Referencing particular examples, explain how the study’s design aligns with quantitative methods.

Slides 7–9: Characteristics of Qualitative Research

Summarize the qualitative research article.,
Explain the characteristics that make the study qualitative,
Exploratory focus and natural settings.,
Subjective meanings and rich descriptions.,
Use of themes and inductive analysis.,
Highlight specific examples from the article, (e.g., interview protocols, participant observations, coding methods).
Speaker Notes: Provide insights into how the article exemplifies qualitative research characteristics.

Slide 10: Research Design Choices

Discuss the research design used in each study (e.g., experimental, survey, ethnography, grounded theory, case study).
Explain how the chosen design aligns with the method and the research problem.
Speaker Notes: Highlight the connection between research methods, designs, and the types of research questions they address.

Slide 11: Justification for Research Method and Design

Justify why the qualitative method and design were appropriate for the first study.
Justify why the quantitative method and design were appropriate for the second study.
Speaker Notes: Use evidence from the articles to support your explanation and connect the justifications to theoretical or practical considerations.

Slide 12: Comparison and Contrast

Analyze the major differences between qualitative and quantitative research methods and designs, addressing:
Purpose and philosophical assumptions (e.g., postpositivist vs. constructivist worldviews).
Data collection and analysis approaches.
Strengths and limitations of each method and design.
Use examples from your articles to illustrate the contrasts.
Speaker Notes: Provide additional context and examples to support your analysis.
Slide 13: Challenges in Using Each Method and Design
- Discuss challenges researchers face when using quantitative and qualitative methods (e.g., ensuring validity, managing data complexity).
- Discuss the challenges researchers face when using the proposed research design.
- Propose strategies to overcome these challenges.
- Speaker Notes: Reflect on how these challenges could impact research outcomes and provide practical solutions.
Slides 14–15: Conclusion
- Summarize your findings, emphasizing the importance of aligning research questions, methods, and designs.
- Reflect on how this understanding applies to your program of study.
- Speaker Notes: Highlight key takeaways and connect them to real-world applications in your field.
Slide 16: References
- Include properly formatted APA references for the articles and any other sources used.
- Speaker Notes: Briefly explain the importance of citing sources and how these references supported your presentation.
Format your citations and references according to current APA guidelines.

Submit your assessment.

Assessment Support
- Review the grading rubric for guidance on deliverable expectations.
- Refer to the Presentations, Recordings, and Images resource for help creating presentations and recording videos of yourself giving a presentation for an assessment.
- Review the following resources for writing guidelines and APA information:
- Center for Writing Excellence
- Reference and Citation Generator
- Grammar Assistance

May 23, 2025

Policy Proposal

By Academic Wizard Blog

Develop a 2–4 page Policy Proposal that seeks to improve the outcomes for your chosen healthcare issue and target population.

Collapse All

Introduction

Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

Cost and access to care continue to be main concerns for patients and providers. As technology improves our ability to care for and improve outcomes in patients with chronic and complex illnesses, questions of cost and access become increasingly important. As a master’s-prepared nurse, you must be able to develop policies that will ensure the delivery of care that is effective and can be provided in an ethical and equitable manner.

Professional Context

As a master’s-prepared nurse, you have a valuable viewpoint and voice with which to advocate for policy developments. As a nurse leader and healthcare practitioner, often on the front lines of helping individuals and populations, you are able to articulate and advocate for the patient more than any other professional group in healthcare. This is especially true of populations that may be underserved, underrepresented, or are otherwise lacking a voice. By advocating for and developing policies, you are able to help drive improvements in outcomes for specific populations. The policies you advocate for could be internal ones (just within a specific department or healt care setting) that ensure quality care and compliance. Or they could be external policies (local, state, or federal) that may have more wide-ranging effects on best practices and regulations.

Scenario

The analysis of position papers that your interdisciplinary team presented to the committee has convinced them that it would be worth the time and effort to develop a new policy to address your specific issue in the target population. To that end, your interdisciplinary team has been asked to submit a policy proposal that outlines a specific approach to improving the outcomes for your target population that’s negatively impacted by health inequity. This proposal should be supported by evidence and best practices that illustrate why the specific approaches are likely to be successful. Additionally, you have been asked to address the ways in which applying your policy to interdisciplinary teams could lead to efficiency or effectiveness gains.

This assessment will build upon your previous Analysis of Position Papers for Vulnerable Populations assessment. If, for some reason, you wish to change your specific issue or target population, contact your faculty for approval.

Instructions

For this assessment, you will develop a policy proposal that seeks to improve the outcomes for your chosen healthcare issue and target population. The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your assessment submission addresses all of them. You may also want to read the Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal Scoring Guide and Guiding Questions: Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal [PDF] to better understand how each grading criterion will be assessed.

Propose a policy and guidelines that will lead to improved outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population negatively impacted by health inequity.
Advocate the need for a proposed policy in the context of current outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population negatively impacted by health inequity.
Analyze the potential for an interdisciplinary approach to implementing a proposed policy to increase the efficiency or effectiveness of the care setting to achieve high-quality outcomes.
Communicate proposal in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Example assessment: You may use the Assessment 2 Example [PDF] to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

Submission Requirements

Length of proposal:2–4 double-spaced, typed pages, not including title page or reference list. Your proposal should be succinct yet substantive. No abstract is required.
Number of references:Cite a minimum of 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support the relevance of or need for your policy, as well as interdisciplinary considerations. Resources should be no more than five years old.
APA formatting:Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] to help you in writing and formatting your proposal.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

Competency 1: Design evidence-based advanced nursing care for achieving high-quality population outcomes.,
- Propose a policy and guidelines that will lead to improved outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population negatively impacted by health inequity.,
Competency 2: Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of interdisciplinary interventions in achieving desired population health outcomes.,
- Analyze the potential for an interdisciplinary approach to implementing a proposed policy to increase the efficiency or effectiveness of the care setting to achieve high-quality outcomes.,
Competency 3: Analyze population health outcomes through the lens of social justice structural racism, or health inequity and their implications for health policy advocacy.,
- Advocate the need for a proposed policy in the context of current outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population negatively impacted by health inequity.,
Competency 4: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
- Communicate in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
- Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.

May 23, 2025

Infamous Studies in Psychology

By Academic Wizard Blog

You will examine one of the more Infamous Studies in Psychology where ethical issues were grossly overlooked by preparing a narrated presentation using PowerPoint presentation software. ,You may use one of the studies discussed in this week’s lesson or choose another.,

First provide a brief overview of the study that you selected, discuss the results/findings, and then provide additional details regarding the ethical concerns or violations and why they are of concern., Outline what the researcher must do to revise this study to conform to today’s ethical codes and standards., Frame your response as if you are an IRB reviewer and you are communicating the specific steps that the researcher must take to revise their study to gain approval from the NCU IRB., Be sure to describe the particular APA ethical standards and principles that are in violation within your response and why your recommended revisions are needed before official IRB approvals can be given.

Length: 5 to 7-minute audio worth of information, accompanied by 6-8 PowerPoint slides, not including reference and title slides

References: Include a minimum of 3 scholarly resources.

The completed assignment should address all of the assignment requirements, exhibit evidence of concept knowledge, and demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the content presented in the course. The writing should integrate scholarly resources, reflect academic expectations and current APA standards.

Resources:

Infamous Studies in Psychology

Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct

American Psychological Association. (2016). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Author.
This resource is fundamental in understanding ethics in psychological research.

Institutional Review Board

National University. (n.d.). Institutional review board. Author.
This site includes details about the rules and regulations regarding research within NU.

Kaltura User Guide

National University (2023). Kaltura User Guide. Graduate Studies Support Center.
This resource includes instructions for recording and uploading videos into courses using Kaltura.

PsycLearn Research Methods

PsycLearn Research Methods Version 1.4 (2020). CogBooks, American Psychological Association.
Read and Review Module 3 – Ethics in Research from the PsycLearn textbook.
This reading is fundamental to your understanding of ethics in psychological research with clear definitions, learning examples, and exercises to help you to fully understand these concepts.
This resource is linked in the course.

Stanford Prison Experiment

Zimbardo, P. G. (1971). Stanford prison experiment . Social Psychology Network.
This site contains information and video footage from this infamous study.

Infamous Studies in Psychology

The Belmont Report

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (n.d.). The belmont report. Author.
This resource is a landmark start to ethical reform within the field of psychology regarding research.

The Milgram shock experiment

McLeod, S. (2017). The Milgram shock experiment. Simply Psychology.
This site includes information and video footage from this infamous study.

The Tuskegee Timeline

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). The Tuskegee timeline. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
This site includes information and details about this infamous study.

May 23, 2025

Balanced Scorecard

By Academic Wizard Blog

Balanced Scorecard

Prepare a 500-750-word essay using Microsoft Word outlining each of the 4 perspectives in the balanced scorecard (BSC) and explain how the BSC measures the strategic business unit’s performance in each of the 4 areas. Identify at least 1 critical success factor (CSF) for each section, the objective of the CSF, and the measurement tool that leaders would use to evaluate whether they are meeting the objective. The essay would include at least 4 CSFs with a corresponding measurement tool (4 measurement tools in total).

Include a biblical integration of an organization’s utilization of the BSC/CSFs.

The essay must have a minimum of 500 words and a maximum of 750 words. The objective is to learn how to synthesize course material in a clear and concise manner.,

Current APA formatting must be followed excluding an abstract and table of contents.,

Cite the course textbook and at least 3 scholarly articles from professional accounting and business journals., Wikipedia Investopedia and other popular sources are not considered scholarly sources and should NOT be used., Articles from websites are good supplemental resources but the bulk should come from scholarly journals., Please be sure to review the Online Writing Center’s webpage “Choosing Appropriate Resources for Academic Papers” as it specifically outlines Liberty University’s acceptable resources., A link to the Online Writing Center is included on the Assignment page under Resources.

There is only 1 submission attempt for this assignment.

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

Balanced Scorecard

Include a biblical integration of an organization’s utilization of the BSC/CSFs.

The essay must have a minimum of 500 words and a maximum of 750 words. The objective is to learn how to synthesize course material in a clear and concise manner.

Current APA formatting must be followed, excluding an abstract and table of contents.

Cite the course textbook and at least 3 scholarly articles from professional accounting and business journals. Wikipedia, Investopedia, and other popular sources are not considered scholarly sources and should NOT be used. Articles from websites are good supplemental resources, but the bulk should come from scholarly journals. Please be sure to review the Online Writing Center’s webpage, “Choosing Appropriate Resources for Academic Papers,” as it specifically outlines Liberty University’s acceptable resources. A link to the Online Writing Center is included on the Assignment page under Resources.

There is only 1 submission attempt for this assignment.

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

Previous page 1 … 79 80 81 82 83 … 465 Next page

Category Archives: Blog

NR449 Evidence-Based Practice

RUA: Topic Search Strategy Guidelines

NR449 Evidence-Based Practice

RUA: Topic Search Strategy Guidelines

image1.png

Assessment Support