Blog Archives - Page 3 of 372 - Assignment Help Central

April 22, 2025

Personality theories

comparing and contrasting two Personality theories from the course. You are free to select from among the several theories covered in the course to date, but only two theories may be used.

Your task is to demonstrate your knowledge of these theories via descriptions of their key concepts and detailing the most important aspects of each theory in explaining personality. It is recommended that you revisit the material covered to date to refresh your knowledge of theory details. This is a comprehensive assignment and you should demonstrate in your work that you have studied and comprehended the similarities and the differences between your two chosen theories. This is a fact-based summary only. It should not be based upon your preference for a theory or your opinion. As such, you are to write only in the third-person.

Important and Required Sections

Introduction
Depiction of Theories
Background and Origin of Theories
Comparison of Theories
Contrast of Theories
Conclusion

comparing and contrasting two personality theories from the course. ,You are free to select from among the several theories covered in the course to date but only two theories may be used.,

Your task is to demonstrate your knowledge of these theories via descriptions of their key concepts and detailing the most important aspects of each theory in explaining personality., It is recommended that you revisit the material covered to date to refresh your knowledge of theory details. This is a comprehensive assignment and you should demonstrate in your work that you have studied and comprehended the similarities and the differences between your two chosen theories. This is a fact-based summary only. It should not be based upon your preference for a theory or your opinion. As such, you are to write only in the third-person.

Important and Required Sections

Introduction
Depiction of Theories
Background and Origin of Theories
Comparison of Theories
Contrast of Theories
Conclusion

April 22, 2025

critical article

By Academic Wizard Blog

For this assignment, choose a scholarly critical article from one of the SCTC Library databases, or Google Scholar that makes a clear argument about any one of the stories you’ve read for class so far. The article you choose must provide more than basic biographical information and plot summary alone- it must make an opinionated argument about some aspect of the literary work you’ve read for class. Please summarize the article’s main ideas, then evaluate your article’s merits– is the author’s thesis interesting? Did you agree with its ideas? Did the author do an effective job proving their argument- why or why not?

For this assignment choose a scholarly critical article from one of the SCTC Library databases or Google Scholar that makes a clear argument about any one of the stories you’ve read for class so far., The article you choose must provide more than basic biographical information and plot summary alone-, it must make an opinionated argument about some aspect of the literary work you’ve read for class., Please summarize the article’s main ideas then evaluate your article’s merits– is the author’s thesis interesting?, Did you agree with its ideas? Did the author do an effective job proving their argument- why or why not?,

April 22, 2025

Psychotherapy Group Plan Assignment

By Academic Wizard Blog

EDCO 711

Psychotherapy Group Plan Assignment Instructions

Overview

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to extend the topic you selected in Week One by creating a comprehensive psychotherapy group plan., The plan will clearly differentiate this group from the previously developed psychoeducational group and be grounded in scholarly research and best practices in group psychotherapy.,

Instructions

Students will develop a detailed psychotherapy group plan, differentiating it from a psychoeducational group and demonstrating how it meets the unique therapeutic needs of its members. ,The plan must be fully supported by current research and structured using the following headings:,

1. Topic Overview Provide a succinct and clear description of the psychotherapy group’s focus. Articulate why this topic is appropriate for a psychotherapy group, supported by evidence-based research. This section should introduce the therapeutic rationale for choosing group as a treatment modality.

2. Differentiation of Psychotherapy and Psychoeducation Clearly explain the distinctions between psychotherapy and psychoeducation within the context of group work. Highlight the theoretical and practical differences between the two approaches and how these differences impact the design, goals, and leadership of the proposed group.

3. Group Composition Describe the ideal composition of the psychotherapy group. This section should outline the inclusion/exclusion criteria for group members, considering factors such as demographics, presenting issues, and the therapeutic needs of the population. Provide a rationale for why this composition will support the therapeutic goals of the group.

4. Setting and Structure Detail the setting in which the group will take place (e.g., in-person, virtual), including the physical environment, frequency of sessions, and duration of the group. Ensure that the setting and structure align with best practices for psychotherapy groups and are conducive to achieving therapeutic outcomes.

5. Goals of the Group Outline the specific therapeutic goals for the group. These goals should be measurable, realistic, and directly tied to the presenting issues of the group members. Support these goals with research and therapeutic theory, demonstrating how they will contribute to meaningful therapeutic change.

6. Group Member Guidelines Establish the guidelines that will govern group member behavior, including expectations for participation, confidentiality, and group cohesion. These guidelines should promote a safe and therapeutic environment for all members and be informed by ethical standards in group therapy.

7. Group Leader Role and Function Describe the role and function of the group leader. This section should discuss the leadership style, interventions, and therapeutic techniques the leader will use to facilitate the group process. Provide a rationale for these choices based on research and group theory.

8. Biblical Integration: Demonstrate biblical integration by incorporating relevant Christian principles and scripture to support your points. This should include appropriate Christian resources, such as theological texts, biblical commentaries, or scholarly works from a Christian perspective, to substantiate points and enhance the depth.

9. Conclusion Summarize the key points of your psychotherapy group plan, reinforcing how the group is designed to meet the therapeutic needs of its members. Highlight the importance of the group’s goals and structure in achieving successful outcomes.

Formatting and Submission Requirements

· Length: Your paper should be 8-10 pages, excluding title and reference pages.

· APA Style: Follow current APA professional formatting guidelines throughout the paper, including proper citations and references.

· References: Include at least seven scholarly, peer-reviewed references, published within the last three-five years, to support your group plan. These sources should reflect the most current research and best practices in group psychotherapy.

· Headings: Use headings to organize your paper and ensure clarity and coherence.

Assessment This assignment will be assessed based on your ability to clearly differentiate between psychotherapy and psychoeducation, the depth of your group plan, the integration and synthesization of research, and adherence to APA professional formatting guidelines.

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

Psychotherapy Group Plan Assignment

April 22, 2025

Proposal Program

By Academic Wizard Blog

Proposal Program

Begin your initial post with a one-sentence summary of your proposal topic. Then, give a brief description of the activities leading to achieving the objectives in your program proposal. It should include your rationale behind their selection, their sequence, and your reasoning behind why these methods may work. This discussion will help you complete Milestone Five, which is due in Module Six.

Begin your initial post with a one-sentence summary of your proposal topic., Then give a brief description of the activities leading to achieving the objectives in your program proposal., It should include your rationale behind their selection, their sequence and your reasoning behind why these methods may work., This discussion will help you complete Milestone Five, which is due in Module Six.

April 22, 2025

Ethics

By Academic Wizard Blog

Ethics

Prompt

For Milestone Four you will submit a draft of your planning section., You will provide a comprehensive program plan that includes its objectives (i.e., measurable improvements in behavior,

performance, process, or a tangible item that will result from your program); ethical and legal considerations, including a review of the four ethical principles, ensuring appropriate legal and

social responsibility of your proposal; financial considerations and their anticipated effect on internal policy and operations; anticipated issue-related outcomes and your plan to address

them; and a timeline for meeting program objectives.

Ethics

Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

IV. Planning

Provide a comprehensive program plan that includes the following:

Objectives that are measurable improvements in behavior, performance, process, or a tangible item that will result from your program. The objectives should not be just a list of

activities needed to achieve the final goals but should be markers for how to measure the success of the proposal after implementation. Refer to the module resources on crafting

SMART goals for support.

Ethical and legal considerations, including a review of the four ethical principles (autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice), ensuring appropriate social responsibility

of your proposal.

Financial considerations, including any potential financial impact your proposal will have for the organization and an evaluation of the required resources to implement and

sustain your proposal.

Anticipated issues-related outcomes and your plan to address them. Be sure to address the anticipated effect on internal policy and operations.

A timeline for meeting program objectives.

What to Submit

Ethics

The draft of your planning section should be submitted as a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Any

references should be cited in APA format. Use appropriate headings to identify each critical element.



4/22/25, 9:05 AM Assignment Information

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/content/1894082/viewContent/40165659/View 1/2

https://app.readspeaker.com/cgi-bin/rsent?customerid=9568&url=https%3A%2F%2Flearn.snhu.edu%2Fcontent%2Fenforced%2F1894082-HCM-700-10358.202518-1%2FMilestone%2520Four%2520Guidelines%2520and%2520Rubric.html&lang=en_us&readid=d2l_read_element_1

Milestone Four Rubric

Criteria Exemplary (100%) Proficient (90%) Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%) Value

Objectives Meets “Proficient” criteria and

demonstrates a high level of

understanding of measurable

objectives

Create measurable objectives

of the program proposal that

can be used as markers for

success of the proposal

Creates the objectives of the

program proposal but they are

not measurable

Does not create the objectives

of the program proposal

Ethical and Legal

Considerations

Meets “Proficient” criteria and

demonstrates a firm grasp of

the ethical and legal

considerations

Describes the ethical and legal

considerations and their

anticipated effect on the

proposal

Describes the ethical and legal

considerations but not their

anticipated effect on the

proposal

Does not describe the ethical

and legal considerations

Financial Considerations Meets “Proficient” criteria and

demonstrates a strong

understanding of the financial

impact of the proposal on the

organization

Discusses the financial impact

of the proposal on the

organization, including

evaluation of the required

resources to support the

success of the program

Discusses the financial impact

of the proposal on the

organization, but misses

important details

Does not discuss the financial

impact of the proposal on the

organization

Anticipated Issues-Related

Outcomes

Meets “Proficient” criteria and

demonstrates a firm grasp on

the anticipated issues-related

outcomes and ways to address

them

Discusses the anticipated

issues-related outcomes and

ways to address them

Discusses the anticipated

issues-related outcomes but

doesn’t discuss the ways to

address them or misses other

important details

Does not discuss the

anticipated issues-related

outcomes and ways to address

them

Timeline Meets “Proficient” criteria and

demonstrates a strong

understanding of project

planning

Includes an appropriate and

realistic timeline for meeting

program objectives

Includes a timeline for meeting

program objectives but it is

unrealistic or missing important

details

Does not include a timeline for

meeting program objectives

Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors

related to citations, grammar,

spelling, syntax, and

organization and is presented

in a professional and easy-to-

read format

Submission has no major errors

related to citations, grammar,

spelling, syntax, or organization

Submission has major errors

related to citations, grammar,

spelling, syntax, or organization

that negatively impact

readability and articulation of

main ideas

Submission has critical errors

related to citations, grammar,

spelling, syntax, or organization

that prevent understanding of

ideas

Total: 100%

4/22/25, 9:05 AM Assignment Information

https://learn.snhu.edu/d2l/le/content/1894082/viewContent/40165659/View 2/2

April 22, 2025

Chinese history.

By Academic Wizard Blog

Chinese history.

This essay is supposed to be 6-8 pages (double spaced) and it’s for a class about Chinese history. We can consult scholarly works – monographs and/or scholarly journal article – and integrate them into a coherent, argument-driven paper.

My idea: I want to delve into the three principles and exploring the kind of China, government, and Chinese people Sun Yat-sen envisioned.

Texts that my teacher wants me to consider:

· Sun Yat-sen’s lectures on the “Three People’s principles”

· “The Four Powers of the People (1924)” by Sun Yat sen

· “The Principle of Democracy” (1924) – also by Sun Yat sen

Pointers and guidance given by my teacher:,

Consider addressing nationalism (first principle) in relation to Sun’s anti-Manchu ideology and his later advocacy for self-determination for the Chinese people as a whole.,

· The second principle “democracy” – Sun Yat-sen’s interpretation of democracy differs from the Western perspective.,

· He defined it as the Chinese people’s control over their government and nation.,

· The principle of “people’s livelihood” also appears to be less clearly defined.,

· In summary, Sun seems to envision popular sovereignty with responsible citizens governing the nation, in contrast to the Western concern about an overly powerful government.

Chinese history.

GRADING RUBRIC

image1.png

My idea: I want to delve into the three principles and exploring the kind of China, government, and Chinese people Sun Yat-sen envisioned.

Texts that my teacher wants me to consider:

· Sun Yat-sen’s lectures on the “Three People’s principles”

· “The Four Powers of the People (1924)” by Sun Yat sen

· “The Principle of Democracy” (1924) – also by Sun Yat sen

Chinese history.

Pointers and guidance given by my teacher:

· Consider addressing nationalism (first principle) in relation to Sun’s anti-Manchu ideology and his later advocacy f

April 22, 2025

Logical Reasoning

By Academic Wizard Blog

Logical Reasoning

PHI2604

Chapter three Study Guide

This study guide is a map to help you prepare for the exam and does not include everything we covered in class or from the reading.

Arguments –passages that present reasons for a claim; or a claim defended with reasons. Arguments are comprised of one or more premises and a conclusion. So, an argument is a group of statements or premises that are offered in support of the conclusion.

Premises are statements in an argument offered as evidence or reasons for accepting another statement, the conclusion.

The conclusion is the statement in an argument that the premises are intended to prove or support.

A statement is a sentence that can be viewed as either true or false. For a statement to function as a premise it must make a claim. Commands, reports, rhetorical questions, illustrations, and explanations are not premises.

Premise indicators

since (nontemporal meaning)

as indicated by

because

for

in that

as (noncomparison meaning)

may be inferred from

given that

seeing that

for the reason that

inasmuch as

owing to

Logical Reasoning

Conclusion indicators (therefore, thus, it follows that, consequently, hence, which means that, so…)

therefore

wherefore

accordingly

we may conclude

entails that

hence

thus

consequently we may infer

it must be that

whence

it follows that

implies that

as a result

The Principle of Charity

Deductive Argument—an argument form in which one reasons from premises that are known or assumed to be true to a conclusion that follows necessarily from these premises. Deductive arguments often begin with a general claim and proceed to specific claims: ‘All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Therefore, Socrates is mortal. If one accepts the premises then one must accept the conclusion. [Don’t forget that in the spirit of Socrates we can always reject a premise and call for a definition and challenge a definition with a counterexample.]

Inductive Argument—an argument form in which one reasons from premises that are known or assumed to be true to a conclusion that is supported by the premises but does not necessarily follow from them. Premises are provided as evidence in support of the conclusion, that is premises are intended to make the conclusion more probable. [ causal reasoning and empirical generalizations in inductive argumentation]

Empirical Generalization (in inductive reasoning), reasoning from a limited sample to a general conclusion (the opposite of deductive argumentation), that is reasoning from a limited sample to a general conclusion based on this sample.

Causal Reasoning, a form of inductive reasoning in which an event (or events) is claimed to be the result (the cause) of another event (or events). [re: This type of reasoning was challenged by the skepticism of David Hume, e.g., light switch example I gave you. For causal reasoning to work it must follow strict guidelines as in the scientific method.]

The Scientific Method, holds that world is a complex web of causal relationships that can be discovered through systematic investigation. The five steps of scientific method include: 1. Identify an event or a relationship between events to be investigated 2. Gather information about the event (or events) 3. Develop a hypothesis or theory to explain what is happening 4. Test the hypothesis or theory through experimentation 5. Evaluate the hypothesis or theory based on experimental results

Hypothesis, a possible explanation that is introduced to account for a set of facts that can be used as a basis for further investigation.

Logical Reasoning

Logical Fallacies: Mistakes in reasoning (purposefully committed and are rhetorical devices, or simply incorrectreasoning)

–Either/or, a.k.a., false dilemma, false dichotomy, or black-or-white argument

–Argumentum ad hominem (appeal to [attacking] the person]

-Begging the question/circular reasoning

–Appeal to [false] authority

–Appeals to emotion

–Straw man argument

–red herring

–false cause

–slippery slope fallacy

–argumentum ad populum

Logical Reasoning

Write a college-level essay in which you argue your position on Euthanasia and Physician-assisted Suicide, chapter 11. You will be graded on your ability to construct a sustained argument using outside sources data the ethical theories we covered in class as well as proper usage of grammar and syntax. a.), You are required to label each part of your argument using the format for moral argumentation sheet. b.) , Use chapter eleven for definition sources and data and document source by putting “textbook p.__”. c.) ,Use at least one independent (non-textbook) source and document it. d.), Use no more than two lines of quotation for textbook or outside source(s) e.) avoid in pro-argument and point out in con-argument any logical fallacies., Zero credit for unlabeled arguments. -30 if rough draft not submitted before class on due date.

April 20, 2025

Gang Violence in Fresno

By Academic Wizard Blog

2000-wo’rd pa’per (7 to 8 pa’ges) on Gang Violence in Fresno: Causes, Impact, and Law Enforcement Response.

The socioeconomic factors fueling gang recruitment in Fresno.,
The connection between gang activity and violent crime rates.,
Law enforcement strategies, such as Operation No Fly Zone and gang injunctions.,
The effectiveness of community programs aimed at reducing gang violence.

Make sure to cover the following in your pa’per:

why you consider topic to be most important today include a historical perspective if necessary,
use various sou’rces data to support your viewpoint/argument include State and/or local data / information
give what you see as possible solution(s) to the problem(s),
utilize at least 5 different ty’pes of resou’rces (NOTE: Wikipedia is not an acceptable resou’rce),

Requirements

Minimum of 2,000 wo’rds of wr’iting in original student text. “2,000 wo’rds” translates into approximately 7 to 8 double-spaced ty’ped pa’ges (250-300 wo’rds per pa’ge), varying with margins and size and style of fo’nt.
Gang Violence in Fresno

Maximum 12pt. black color fo’nt, double spaced, with sou’rces properly documented in ML’A style formatted with one-inch margins, spell-checked, grammar checked, with “wo’rd count,” take note that ref’erence/sou’rce pa’ge and/or attachments do not count towards wo’rd count.

This Pa’per is based on the previous Rough Dr’aft Pa’per, which will be provided below with FEEDBACK.

Gang Violence in Fresno

Feedback: This is a good start. Be sure to continue citing sources throughout the paper. The topic is the crime and criminal behavior of juveniles, so it’s important to explore who these individuals are and why they are drawn into this lifestyle. Consider all influencing factors, including the criminal aspect—what crimes they commit and the reasons behind them.

Additionally, examine how laws regarding gangs have changed over time. What do law enforcement officials say about gangs? What are families’ perspectives? What do advocacy groups believe? Insights from former gang members about what is needed or what works are also valuable. Finally, discuss why gangs are considered a critical issue in relation to crime today.

April 20, 2025

Student Outcomes

By Academic Wizard Blog

Student Outcomes

Watch The Video:

Shine the light on the student perspective
Should you be in the position of knowing how you could help improve student outcomes
through Instructional Coaching, but not a position to develop and hire, you can still
make great strides.

The first step is reflecting on how prior implementations have
progressed and which educators are at the various stages of implementation. For
example, review the stages of implementation and then determine who is in which
carriage using the three carriage train analogy? What correlations do you see between
their response to innovation and the stage of implementation? How can that information
help you plan who to reach out to as you move forward with your plan to implement
Instructional Coaching?

Student Outcomes
Submit a Word document with your answers.Watch The Video:

Shine the light on the student perspective
Should you be in the position of knowing how you could help improve student outcomes
through Instructional Coaching but not a position to develop and hire you can still
make great strides., The first step is reflecting on how prior implementations have
progressed and which educators are at the various stages of implementation. ,For
example review the stages of implementation and then determine who is in which
carriage using the three carriage train analogy?, What correlations do you see between
their response to innovation and the stage of implementation? ,How can that information
help you plan who to reach out to as you move forward with your plan to implement
Instructional Coaching?

Student Outcomes
Submit a Word document with your answers.Watch The Video:

Shine the light on the student perspective
Should you be in the position of knowing how you could help improve student outcomes
through Instructional Coaching, but not a position to develop and hire, you can still
make great strides. The first step is reflecting on how prior implementations have
progressed and which educators are at the various stages of implementation. For
example, review the stages of implementation and then determine who is in which
carriage using the three carriage train analogy? What correlations do you see between
their response to innovation and the stage of implementation? How can that information
help you plan who to reach out to as you move forward with your plan to implement
Instructional Coaching?
Submit a Word document with your answers.

April 20, 2025

Literary Research Project

By Academic Wizard Blog

Literary Research Project

Reminder: Late assignments are not accepted.

Purpose: This project is intended to provide students with an opportunity to research and independently explore the life and literature of a specific author.

Assignment: After signing up for one of the authors listed on the Literary Research Project sign-up sheet, create a presentation on the author you have selected. The presentation will include biographical information along with an analysis of one work by this author. This presentation will be included in the Literary Research Project Timeline which is located in the Discussions menu folder. Each presentation will be placed within a designated discussion thread.

Process: Follow these steps:

1–Select and sign up for one of the authors and specific work presented in the Literary Research Project Sign up list located inside of the Discussions menu folder (first item). Follow the directions given in this discussion forum.,

2–Research and prepare the presentation. The following are required elements that need to appear in your presentation (in this order):,

Present a brief biographical summary of the writer’s life (1-2 slides)—(Be sure to cite sources used for this information on the slide,
Give a synopsis (brief summary) of the literary work you have chosen to analyze (1-2 slides). The literary work or excerpt MUST be one that is included in our Norton Anthology of World Literature volumes 1 or 2.,
Analyze the literary work. This portion of the project may consider ONE of the following ideas (3-4 slides).,

Literary Research Project

–analyze how the writer uses a concept or theme that is prevalent during the time period. For example, if the work is from the romantic era, you might analyze the author’s incorporation of one or two characteristics of romanticism.

–analyze the author’s use of a particular literary or rhetorical device in the work. For example, you might analyze the author’s use of metaphor, irony, or another device.

–analyze the structure of the work and how the structure helps the author convey meaning.

NOTE: Develop the analysis thoroughly. The analysis is not simply pointing to some aspect of the literary work. An analysis deconstructs the literary work with a focus on the specific element being explored and discusses where in the work and how the writer develops this element of the piece of literature. These ideas are supported by using specific examples from the literary work you have chosen.

Include parenthetical in-text citations for any/all sources used in each slide presented. (Citations appear on every slide if sources are used in every slide.) NOTE: Not citing is plagiarism and will be counted as such.
End the presentation with one slide that briefly assesses what this work or this author offers modern readers. Your assessment might answer one of these questions (1 slide):

What would a modern reader enjoy about this author’s ideas or the work you analyzed?
How might the author’s ideas be influential in society today?
What ideas do modern readers need to learn from this author?

Please note that each of these elements is required and is part of the grade for this assignment. Missing or underdeveloped elements of this assignment will result in points being deducted.

Create Your Presentation: You are encouraged to be creative in your presentation. You may use PowerPoint or a Prezi. Follow the suggested number of slides listed above for each section of the presentation.

Use MLA Style for Documentation: All presentations will need to include both of these:

* in-text citations placed on each slide in which research is used

* a separate slide at the end of the presentation that provides a list of Works Cited. This list will include documentation for all of the sources used to prepare and develop the presentation. The Works Cited list must follow MLA style documentation for each resource entry. The entries should also include documentation for the literary work analyzed in the presentation. Here is an example of how to document one of the works from our textbook. Note that it is double spaced and uses a hanging indent.

Literary Research Project

Chekov, Anton. “The Lady with the Dog.” The Norton Anthology of World Literature, edited by Martin Puchner et al., shorter 4^th ed., eBook, vol. 2, W. W. Norton, 2021, pp. 872-83.

See the two handouts MLA Basics and More MLA, located in the Literary Research Project folder. Also, here is a link to the Online Writing Lab at Purdue University:

Creating the Works Cited

Post Your Presentation:

Inside the Literary Research Project discussion forum, locate the name of your author, and click on it. This will place you inside of the forum thread.

Once inside of your author’s forum thread, click on “Reply.” You may now upload your presentation. You may write a brief note of introduction to your presentation if you wish. Be sure to click on “Submit” once you have uploaded your presentation. You may make edits to this forum thread until the due date (May 5, no later than 11:30 pm).

Research Guidelines: For this assignment, use three to five well prepared and accurately researched sources. Follow these guidelines to assure that you select appropriate, credible sources for your information:

These Dallas College databases—Academic Search Complete, JSTOR, Gale eBooks

Books or eBooks on the author or the literary work

Credible online sources, for example, Poetry Foundation, New World Encyclopedia, or author websites (i.e., The Shakespeare Birthplace Trust)

WARNING:

DO NOT USE org and sources with the domain “.com” because these are not considered academic sources. DO NOT use these sources.
DO NOT use artificial intelligence (AI) to form your author’s biography or overview of a work without an author, your analysis, or your assessment slide.

Visuals: You may include visuals in your slides or in your video. However, be sure to provide a label indicating a title and source for any visuals included. Also, you will need to include closed captioning if you create a video. (This is often an automatic feature on video composition apps.) Follow MLA guidelines for labeling visuals: MLA Guidelines for Providing Visual Captions

Questions????

If you have any questions about this Literary Research Project, please contact Dr. Huston immediately.

Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 … 372 Next page

Category Archives: Blog

image1.png