Hi, How Can We Help You?
  • Address: 1251 Lake Forest Drive New York
  • Email Address: assignmenthelpcentral@gmail.com

Category Archives: Blog

October 3, 2025
October 3, 2025

PADM 804 Discussion Guidelines

You will complete 2 Discussions in this course. You will post one thread of at least 750 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. You must then post 2 replies of at least 250 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of the assigned Module: Week. In Module 8: Week 8 you must submit your replies by no later than 11:59pm (ET) on Friday.

For each thread, you must support your assertions with at least 4 scholarly citations in current APA format. Each reply must incorporate at least 2 scholarly citations in current APA format. You must provide a biblical based support for your response. Acceptable sources include: course read items, peer-reviewed journal articles, and the Bible.

  • What are the requirements for completing the discussion threads in PADM 804?,

  • How many words must the initial thread and replies contain?,

  • What is the deadline for posting threads and replies in Module 8?,

  • How many scholarly citations are required for threads and replies, and in what format?,

  • How should Biblical principles be incorporated into responses?

PADM 804 Discussion Guidelines


Comprehensive General Guidance

1. Requirements for Discussion Threads

In PADM 804, discussions are designed to engage students in critical thinking, application of course material, and scholarly dialogue. For each discussion:

  • Initial Thread: Students must post a thread of at least 750 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module Week.

  • Replies: Students must post two replies of at least 250 words each by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday (except for Module 8, Week 8, where replies are due Friday).

  • Scholarly Support: Each thread must include at least four scholarly citations in current APA format. Each reply must include at least two scholarly citations in APA format. Acceptable sources include:

    • Course readings

    • Peer-reviewed journal articles

    • The Bible for Biblical-based support


2. Structuring the Initial Thread

The initial discussion thread should demonstrate:

  • Clear Thesis or Argument: Begin with a focused statement addressing the discussion prompt.

  • Integration of Scholarly Sources: Use at least four citations to support your points, providing analysis rather than just summary.

  • Biblical Perspective: Incorporate relevant Biblical principles to reinforce ethical, moral, or leadership points. Examples include:

    • Stewardship and responsibility (Genesis 2:15)

    • Cooperation and service to others (Ecclesiastes 4:9–10)

    • Justice and fairness (Proverbs 21:3)

  • Critical Analysis: Evaluate concepts, discuss implications, and connect theory to practical public administration contexts.

  • Professional Tone: Maintain academic writing style, clear organization, and proper APA formatting.


3. Structuring Replies

Replies to peers are meant to foster discussion, collaboration, and reflection:

  • Word Count: Each reply must be at least 250 words.

  • Scholarly Support: Include at least two citations per reply in APA format.

  • Biblical Integration: Connect responses to ethical or moral considerations based on Biblical principles.

  • Engagement Strategies:

    • Offer constructive feedback

    • Ask thoughtful questions to expand discussion  PADM 804 Discussion Guidelines Compare or contrast perspectives using evidence from readings or research

    • Avoid simple agreement statements; instead, provide analysis or additional insights

Salutation: Begin each reply with a polite and professional greeting, such as:

“Hello [Peer’s Name],” or “Dear [Peer’s Name],”


4. Deadlines and Time Management

  • Initial Thread: Thursday, 11:59 p.m. (ET) of the assigned Module Week

  • Replies: Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (ET) of the assigned Module Week

  • Exception – Module 8: Replies must be submitted by Friday, 11:59 p.m. (ET)

Tip: Posting early allows for more meaningful interaction and gives peers time to respond thoughtfully.


5. APA and Citation Guidelines

  • In-Text Citations: Use author-date style (e.g., Smith, 2020) and include page numbers when quoting directly.

  • Reference List: Include all sources cited in-text, formatted according to the latest APA guidelines.

  • Biblical Citation Example:

(New International Version, 2011, Gen. 2:15)

  • Avoid Plagiarism: Summarize, paraphrase, and quote properly, ensuring originality in discussion contributions.


6. Biblical-Based Support

In all discussions and replies, incorporating Biblical principles provides ethical and moral grounding:

  • Leadership and Wisdom: Proverbs 11:14 emphasizes seeking counsel for effective decision-making.

  • Service and Cooperation: Ecclesiastes 4:9–10 highlights collaboration and mutual support.

  • Integrity and Justice: Micah 6:8 and Proverbs 21:3 remind administrators to act justly and uphold moral responsibility.

These references should be used to strengthen arguments and illustrate ethical considerations in public administration.


Summary

To successfully meet PADM 804 discussion requirements:

  1. Post a 750-word initial thread with four scholarly citations and Biblical support.

  2. Post two replies of 250 words each with two citations per reply and Biblical integration.

  3. Use professional, academically-written language with APA formatting.

  4. Respect deadlines: Thursday for threads, Sunday for replies (Friday for Module 8).

  5. Engage critically, support arguments with evidence, and demonstrate ethical reflection.

Following these guidelines ensures discussions are meaningful, scholarly, and aligned with both course and Biblical principles.

October 3, 2025
October 3, 2025

Supreme Court & Federalism

· Provide a Biblically based support for your analysis

· Sources must be derived from Read items assigned for the Module: Week in which the Case Study is assigned, peer-reviewed journal articles, and your independent research.

· All citations and format must be in current APA format

· Include 8 – 10 sources, not including your Biblical analysis

· Double-spaced, with 1-inch margins, written in 12-point Times New Roman font.

Paper must be 8-10 pages

Case Study: The Supreme Court, Federalism, and Public Administrators Assignment

Supreme Court & Federalism

Christensen and Wise (2009) state,

[t]he U.S. Supreme Court has come to play an important role in articulating that system of rules. The Supreme Court’s federalism decisions are especially important in understanding what powers public managers [must] achieve policy priorities in the current context of devolved government.

For this Case Study Assignment, you will provide a scholarly paper concerning the effect of recent Supreme Court decisions on public administration and federalism.

Supreme Court & Federalism

 

  • Provide a scholarly paper concerning the effect of recent Supreme Court decisions on public administration and federalism.,

  • Provide a Biblically based support for your analysis.,

  • Sources must be derived from Read items assigned for the Module: Week in which the Case Study is assigned, peer-reviewed journal articles and your independent research.,

  • All citations and format must be in current APA format.,

  • Include 8 – 10 sources not including your Biblical analysis double-spaced 12-point Times New Roman font with 1-inch margins 8–10 pages.


Comprehensive General Analysis

Introduction

The U.S. Supreme Court has increasingly influenced federalism and public administration, shaping how powers are shared between the federal and state governments. As Christensen and Wise (2009) note, Supreme Court decisions define the rules public managers must follow to implement policy effectively within a system of devolved government. Recent rulings impact agency authority, resource allocation, and program implementation, requiring administrators to navigate legal and constitutional frameworks carefully.

From a Biblical perspective, principles of justice, wise leadership, and accountability (Proverbs 11:14; Romans 13:1–4) support responsible governance. Public administrators are called to exercise authority fairly and prudently while respecting the limits of their jurisdiction.


1. Effect of Supreme Court Decisions on Federalism

  • Defining State vs. Federal Powers: Decisions such as NFIB v. Sebelius (2012) and Arizona v. United States (2012) clarify the boundaries of federal authority and state autonomy, directly influencing policy implementation.

  • Impact on Public Administration: Agencies must adapt programs to comply with legal interpretations, especially regarding conditional federal funding, state waivers, or preemption of state laws.

  • Policy Devolution: Court rulings often reinforce or constrain the trend toward devolved governance, affecting how federal agencies delegate responsibilities to states.

Example: NFIB v. Sebelius limited the federal government’s ability to compel states to expand Medicaid, giving public administrators in states discretion to implement or decline participation, while federal oversight remained for those accepting funds.


2. Implications for Public Administrators

  • Legal Compliance: Administrators must ensure program implementation aligns with constitutional boundaries and recent case law.

  • Intergovernmental Coordination: Decisions reinforce the need for negotiation between federal and state agencies to implement programs effectively.

  • Policy Flexibility: Federalism rulings sometimes increase discretion for states, requiring public managers to adapt strategies according to state-specific rules.

  • Risk Management: Court decisions create potential legal challenges, and administrators must develop compliance mechanisms to mitigate liability.

Biblical integration: Proverbs 11:14 states, “Where there is no guidance, a people falls, but in an abundance of counselors there is safety.” Administrators’ reliance on legal counsel and intergovernmental coordination reflects the importance of seeking wise guidance to execute policies responsibly.


3. Case Studies of Recent Supreme Court Decisions

  1. NFIB v. Sebelius (2012): Limited federal power in mandating Medicaid expansion.

  2. Arizona v. United States (2012): Clarified federal preemption over state immigration laws.

  3. South Dakota v. Wayfair (2018): Expanded states’ authority to collect sales taxes from out-of-state businesses, affecting administrative processes.

  4. Murphy v. NCAA (2018): Allowed states to regulate sports gambling, reinforcing state autonomy in economic regulation.

Analysis: In each case, public administrators had to interpret and implement policies consistent with the Court’s guidance. These decisions emphasize intergovernmental collaboration, legal compliance, and adaptive administration.


4. Challenges for Public Administrators

  • Balancing Authority: Managers must reconcile state and federal mandates without violating constitutional boundaries.

  • Resource Allocation: Court decisions can shift responsibility and funding requirements, impacting budgets.

  • Policy Uncertainty: Changing legal interpretations create uncertainty in program planning and execution.

  • Accountability: Administrators remain accountable for compliance and effective service delivery, even as boundaries shift.

Biblical perspective: Romans 13:1–4 highlights that authorities are established for justice and protection. Administrators must respect the legal hierarchy while promoting equitable and lawful public service.


5. Strategies for Effective Administration in a Federal System

  • Legal Literacy: Continuous monitoring of Supreme Court decisions ensures administrators remain compliant.

  • Intergovernmental Collaboration: Strong coordination mechanisms between federal and state agencies mitigate risks from jurisdictional ambiguities.

  • Adaptive Policy Design: Flexibility in program implementation allows responsiveness to evolving court interpretations.

  • Stakeholder Engagement: Consulting with legislators, agencies, and communities ensures programs align with legal and ethical standards.

Biblical integration: Ecclesiastes 4:9–10 reminds leaders that collaboration enhances outcomes. Public managers who work cooperatively with multiple jurisdictions can achieve more effective service delivery.

October 3, 2025
October 3, 2025

NASA Collaborative Transformation

Case Study: NASA Collaborative Transformation Assignment

During and before the Apollo program years at NASA, it was the primary government organization involved in all space technology decisions. Since the Space Shuttle Program, NASA has been reinvented. It transformed from a closed system with a hierarchy that develops its technologies internally to an open and collaborative network that promotes innovation and collaboration with other public and private organizations. NASA has become more interdependent.

Using the Moon to Mars Mission (Artemis-Orion), describe this new collaborative approach at NASA.

· Provide a Biblically based support for your analysis

· Sources must be derived from Read items assigned for the Module: Week in which the Case Study is assigned, peer-reviewed journal articles, and your independent research.

· All citations and format must be in current APA format

NASA Collaborative Transformation

· Include 8 – 10 sources/REFRENCES, not including your Biblical analysis

· Double-spaced, with 1-inch margins, written in 12-point Times New Roman font.

Paper must be 8-10 pages

NASA Collaborative Transformation

· PDF READINGS ARE ATTACHED SEPARATELY

  • Using the Moon to Mars Mission (Artemis-Orion) describe this new collaborative approach at NASA.,

  • Provide a Biblically based support for your analysis.,

  • Sources must be derived from Read items assigned for the Module: Week in which the Case Study is assigned peer-reviewed journal articles and your independent research.,

  • All citations and format must be in current APA format.,

  • Include 8 – 10 sources/references not including your Biblical analysis double-spaced 12-point Times New Roman font with 1-inch margins 8–10 pages.


Comprehensive General Analysis

Introduction

NASA’s organizational transformation reflects a shift from a closed, hierarchical model to an open, collaborative network that leverages partnerships with public and private organizations. During the Apollo era, NASA’s decision-making was centralized, with technology developed internally and limited outside collaboration. The Space Shuttle Program and subsequent missions catalyzed a cultural and operational transformation toward interdependence, collaboration, and innovation.

The Artemis-Orion Mission (Moon to Mars) exemplifies this new approach. NASA now engages private aerospace companies, international partners, academic institutions, and other federal agencies to achieve ambitious exploration goals. This collaborative model aligns with Biblical principles of stewardship, cooperation, and shared responsibility (Ecclesiastes 4:9–10; Proverbs 15:22), underscoring the importance of partnerships for achieving complex missions.


1. NASA’s Collaborative Approach: Artemis-Orion

  • Public-Private Partnerships: NASA collaborates with companies like SpaceX, Blue Origin, and Lockheed Martin for spacecraft development, launch services, and mission operations. This allows rapid innovation, cost-sharing, and leveraging specialized expertise.

  • International Collaboration: Artemis involves partnerships with ESA (European Space Agency), JAXA (Japan), and CSA (Canada), fostering global cooperation in technology, research, and exploration objectives.

  • Interagency Cooperation: NASA works with other federal agencies, including NOAA for Earth monitoring and DoD for communication infrastructure, demonstrating cross-agency collaboration.

  • Open Innovation and Knowledge Sharing: NASA promotes collaborative problem-solving, hackathons, and open-source initiatives to accelerate innovation and integrate external research into mission planning.

Key Outcomes:

  • Accelerated technology development, reduced cost through shared resources, and enhanced mission success through diversified expertise.

  • A shift from isolated decision-making to an interconnected network enables NASA to pursue the Moon to Mars mission more effectively than a strictly hierarchical system.

 

October 3, 2025
October 3, 2025

Congressional Clean Lakes Task Force

Dr. McGinnis was involved in the Clean Lakes Study at Lake Allatoona, Georgia and facilitated the creation of a collaborative network of federal, state, regional, and local agencies, and organizations to guide the study. This effort was nationally recognized model of intergovernmental management promoted throughout the U.S. by the U.S. EPA. Analyze the collaborative effort as a model of intergovernmental management. Use only peer reviewed sources including articles from journals, textbooks, theses/dissertations. Including 8- 10 sources not including your Biblical analysis.

Congressional Clean Lakes Task Force

INSTRUCTIONS • Provide a Biblically based support for your analysis • Sources must be derived from Read items assigned for the Module: Week in which the Case Study is assigned, peer-reviewed journal articles, and your independent research. • All citations and format must be in current APA format • Include 8 – 10 sources, not including your Biblical analysis • Double-spaced, with 1-inch margins, written in 12-point Times New Roman font. • Paper must be 8-10 pages

  • Analyze the collaborative effort as a model of intergovernmental management.,

  • Provide a Biblically based support for your analysis.,

  • Use only peer reviewed sources including articles from journals textbooks theses/dissertations.,

  • Include 8 – 10 sources not including your Biblical analysis.,

  • Ensure paper is 8–10 pages APA formatted double-spaced 12-point Times New Roman with 1-inch margins.


Comprehensive General Analysis

Introduction

The Clean Lakes Study at Lake Allatoona, Georgia, led by Dr. McGinnis, represents one of the most recognized intergovernmental collaborations in environmental management. By bringing together federal, state, regional, and local agencies, as well as community stakeholders, this initiative became a nationally recognized model promoted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Intergovernmental management is increasingly critical for addressing complex environmental challenges, since water quality, pollution, and watershed management cross political and jurisdictional boundaries.

From a Biblical perspective, stewardship of natural resources aligns with the mandate in Genesis 2:15, where humankind is called to “work it and take care of” the Garden. Collaborative governance also reflects the principle of mutual accountability and cooperation, as seen in Ecclesiastes 4:9–10, which stresses that two are better than one, for they lift each other up.

This case study evaluates the Lake Allatoona Clean Lakes Task Force as a model of intergovernmental management, drawing on scholarship about collaborative governance, federalism, and environmental policy.


1. Collaborative Effort as Intergovernmental Management

The Clean Lakes Task Force demonstrates how multi-level governance can function in practice:

  • Federal Role (EPA): Provided funding, oversight, and recognition, ensuring that best practices could be scaled nationally.

  • State Agencies: Georgia’s environmental and natural resource agencies coordinated water quality standards, ensuring compliance with federal guidelines.

  • Regional/Local Entities: Local governments, watershed organizations, and community stakeholders provided contextual knowledge, direct monitoring, and on-the-ground management.

  • Academia and Experts: Dr. McGinnis and university partners facilitated knowledge transfer, scientific analysis, and neutral leadership for collaboration.

This multi-tier collaboration reflects the principles of network governance, where no single authority dominates but instead partners share resources, expertise, and responsibilities.

Congressional Clean Lakes Task Force


2. Benefits of the Intergovernmental Collaboration

  • Holistic Problem-Solving: Pollution control and watershed management require cooperation beyond jurisdictional lines. The Clean Lakes Task Force fostered joint action to address nutrient loading, sedimentation, and nonpoint source pollution.

  • Efficiency: Pooling federal funding with state implementation capacity and local knowledge created efficient use of limited resources.

  • Legitimacy and Trust: Inclusion of local stakeholders built public trust, which is crucial for long-term compliance and environmental stewardship.

  • Scalability: The model was replicated nationwide, showing the importance of flexible but coordinated intergovernmental strategies.


3. Challenges of Collaboration

  • Jurisdictional Conflicts: Differing priorities among federal, state, and local actors often required mediation.

  • Resource Disparities: Smaller local agencies lacked technical expertise compared to federal and state counterparts.

  • Coordination Costs: Collaborative governance requires significant time, communication, and negotiation.

  • Sustainability: Maintaining long-term intergovernmental partnerships often depends on continued funding and leadership commitment.


4. Clean Lakes Task Force as a Model

The Clean Lakes program exemplifies a policy network where shared governance produced sustainable outcomes. Scholars of intergovernmental relations (Agranoff & McGuire, 2001) describe such efforts as “collaborative public management,” emphasizing flexibility, negotiation, and shared leadership.

Key features of this model:

  • Interagency Coordination: Aligning federal, state, and local priorities under a common environmental goal.

  • Participatory Governance: Involving local stakeholders to ensure decisions reflect community needs.

  • Adaptive Management: Using scientific data and continuous monitoring to adjust strategies.

  • Shared Accountability: Distributing responsibilities across government levels.

October 3, 2025
October 3, 2025

Disaster Collaboration Networks

INSTRUCTIONS • Provide a Biblically based support for your analysis • Sources must be derived from Read items assigned for the Module: Week in which the Case Study is assigned, peer-reviewed journal articles, and your independent research. • All citations and format must be in current APA format • Include 8 – 10 sources, not including your Biblical analysis • Double-spaced, with 1-inch margins, written in 12-point Times New Roman font. • (Note: Case Study: Federal/State/Local Collaboration Networks in Disasters Assignment must be 10-12 pages).

Address each of the following questions related to federal-state-local collaboration during disasters. 1. Should there be national goals and strong federal direction, as during the period of “creative federalism,” or greater flexibility for state and local officials to target funds and efforts where they feel there is the greatest need? 2. What would happen if the federal role in emergency management was simply reduced to providing financial support? 3. How likely is it that state representatives will address the state’s major hazards without federal encouragement? 4. What are the advantages of developing local capabilities to reduce hazards? How likely is it that local officials will address risks to life and property without outside funding and support?

Disaster Collaboration Networks

Disaster Collaboration Networks

  • Should there be national goals and strong federal direction as during the period of “creative federalism” or greater flexibility for state and local officials to target funds and efforts where they feel there is the greatest need?,

  • What would happen if the federal role in emergency management was simply reduced to providing financial support?,

  • How likely is it that state representatives will address the state’s major hazards without federal encouragement?,

  • What are the advantages of developing local capabilities to reduce hazards?,

  • How likely is it that local officials will address risks to life and property without outside funding and support?


Comprehensive General Analysis

Introduction

Disaster management in the United States has evolved over time as federal, state, and local governments seek to balance roles and responsibilities in protecting life and property. Events such as Hurricane Katrina, 9/11, and more recent disasters demonstrate the importance of coordinated collaboration. Questions of federal leadership versus local flexibility remain central to the debate on how to structure emergency management. From a Biblical perspective, the call for stewardship (1 Peter 4:10), mutual aid (Galatians 6:2), and wise leadership (Proverbs 11:14) aligns with the need for strong, cooperative networks across all levels of government.


1. National Goals and Federal Direction vs. Local Flexibility

Argument for strong federal direction:

  • A unified set of national goals ensures consistency, equity, and the ability to mobilize resources across state lines.

  • Historical examples, such as the era of “creative federalism” in the 1960s, show how strong federal leadership can direct funds efficiently to nationwide priorities.

Argument for flexibility:

  • State and local governments have first-hand knowledge of their communities and are better positioned to prioritize resources based on specific regional risks.

  • Overly centralized control may ignore unique local vulnerabilities.

Balanced approach:

  • The most effective model blends national priorities with local adaptability. The federal government should establish broad frameworks and funding guidelines, while states and localities tailor implementation.

  • Biblically, this reflects the principle of shared responsibility: “Two are better than one… if either of them falls down, one can help the other up” (Ecclesiastes 4:9–10).


2. If Federal Role Were Reduced to Financial Support

  • A purely financial federal role would weaken national capacity for coordination, technical expertise, and standardization of disaster responses.

  • The absence of leadership could lead to duplication of efforts, slower response times, and disparities in preparedness among states.

  • National security threats (e.g., terrorism, pandemics, cyberattacks) require more than funding—they demand unified strategy and intelligence-sharing, which only federal agencies can provide.

  • From a Biblical standpoint, Proverbs 29:18 notes, “Where there is no vision, the people perish.” Financial support without leadership vision could compromise long-term safety and resilience.

October 3, 2025
October 3, 2025

Ideals of American Democracy

The fundamental values that inform how are democratic government is legitimated and organized are enshrined in the Declaration of Independence and in the Constitution of the United States. These principles and founding documents, along with a discussion of other founding documents like the Articles of Confederation, Federalist papers, Bill of Rights, are discussed in the first and second chapters of MindTap.

Studying these democratic principles and ideals, as well as our founding documents, can help position you for success not only in this course, but also as you prepare to take the FCLE (Florida Civic Literacy Exam) in the future!

In this 1,000-word minimum essay, your goal will be the following:

“To identify and discuss the basic ideals and principles of American democracy and how they are applied in our republican form of government.”

Ideals of American Democracy

Please complete BOTH parts of this essay:

1st part of essay

· Briefly describe the democratic ideals and principles expressed in our nation’s founding documents.

· Analyze how these principles and ideals have shaped America as a constitutional republic.

2nd part of essay

· Briefly differentiate among our nation’s founding documents – including the Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation, Constitution, Bill of Rights, and Federalist Papers.

· Explain the role of each of these documents in the founding of the United States. Ideals of American Democracy

  • Briefly describe the democratic ideals and principles expressed in our nation’s founding documents.,

  • Analyze how these principles and ideals have shaped America as a constitutional republic.,

  • Briefly differentiate among our nation’s founding documents – including the Declaration of Independence Articles of Confederatio Constitution Bill of Rights and Federalist Papers.,

  • Explain the role of each of these documents in the founding of the United States.,

  • Identify and discuss the basic ideals and principles of American democracy and how they are applied in our republican form of government.


Comprehensive General Essay (minimum 1,000 words)

Introduction

The United States was founded on a set of democratic ideals and principles that continue to serve as the foundation of its political system. These ideals, captured in the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and other founding documents, define not only how the government operates but also how it is legitimized by the consent of the governed. To understand American democracy, one must examine these guiding principles, the influence they had in shaping the United States as a constitutional republic, and the role each founding document played in creating the framework of government.

October 3, 2025
October 3, 2025

Data Governance & Database Design

. As HIM director of a healthcare system, you have been appointed to a team of individuals to develop a rationale for a Data Governance (DG) program. In one of the first team meetings the agenda is to discuss and develop a list of key factors for DG program success and explain why each is critical for achieving a viable DG program.

Data Governance & Database Design

a. Create the supporting document that will be presented at an Executive meeting to help the CEO and other executives decide about how to structure the DG program. (25 points)

2.  Many hospitals need to track trends about patient outcomes to improve healthcare delivery. However, they often lack the tools necessary to achieve that goal. At University Hospital, the database management systems (DBMS) administrator is responsible for creating and maintaining databases. Several departments have asked him to develop real-time analytics and visualizations to track patient trends. These real-time analytics and visualizations would be based on standard simple queries. They also want to keep track of all the data they document and have had trouble creating a system that is modeled well for easy access.

a.  Evaluate if the DBMS administrator should choose a NoSQL database or a relational database for real-time analytics and visualization?

b. For the system the database administrator must build to track all the data University Hospital documents, what are the database design steps the database administrator should follow to ensure the information is organized and stored for easy access? Please describe each step. Data Governance & Database Design

  • As HIM director of a healthcare system  you have been appointed to a team of individuals to develop a rationale for a Data Governance (DG) program. In one of the first team meetings the agenda is to discuss and develop a list of key factors for DG program success and explain why each is critical for achieving a viable DG program.,

  • Create the supporting document that will be presented at an Executive meeting to help the CEO and other executives decide about how to structure the DG program. (25 points),

  • Many hospitals need to track trends about patient outcomes to improve healthcare delivery. However they often lack the tools necessary to achieve that goal. At University Hospital, the database management systems (DBMS) administrator is responsible for creating and maintaining databases. Several departments have asked him to develop real-time analytics and visualizations to track patient trends. These real-time analytics and visualizations would be based on standard simple queries. They also want to keep track of all the data they document and have had trouble creating a system that is modeled well for easy access.,

  • Evaluate if the DBMS administrator should choose a NoSQL database or a relational database for real-time analytics and visualization?,

  • For the system the database administrator must build to track all the data University Hospital documents, what are the database design steps the database administrator should follow to ensure the information is organized and stored for easy access? Please describe each step.

October 3, 2025
October 3, 2025

Nuremberg & Lubanga

  • Review the Due Process in Proceedings Before International Criminal Tribunals in Section C on page 124 of your text.
    • Select either the International Military Tribunals in Nuremberg or the International Military Tribunals in Tokyo and conduct research involving either one of these Tribunals.
    • Provide a background of the purpose of these Tribunals and what each was intended to provide to criminal defendants.
    • Offer your assessment of the success of the Tribunal in accordance with the commitment to protection of Due Process Rights of Human Criminal Defendants.

I also need help in the following

  • Conduct research and locate a case that involves either pretrial rights or trial rights that was heard in the international arena before the International Criminal Court.
    • Provide a brief summary of the main issues, the pretrial and trial process, and the outcome of the case.
    • Discuss how the case reflects the defendant being provided with five pretrial rights or trial rights.
    • Provide specific examples of these rights in action during the specific case you researched and selected. Nuremberg & Lubanga

Nuremberg & Lubanga

  • Review the Due Process in Proceedings Before International Criminal Tribunals in Section C on page 124 of your text.,

  • Select either the International Military Tribunals in Nuremberg or the International Military Tribunals in Tokyo and conduct research involving either one of these Tribunals.,

  • Provide a background of the purpose of these Tribunals and what each was intended to provide to criminal defendants.,

  • Offer your assessment of the success of the Tribunal in accordance with the commitment to protection of Due Process Rights of Human Criminal Defendants.,

  • Conduct research and locate a case that involves either pretrial rights or trial rights that was heard in the international arena before the International Criminal Court; provide a brief summary of the main issues, the pretrial and trial process, and the outcome of the case; discuss how the case reflects the defendant being provided with five pretrial rights or trial rights; provide specific examples of these rights in action during the specific case you researched and selected.


Answers — comprehensive (general)

1) Quick note about the textbook instruction

I don’t have your specific textbook or the exact page 124 Section C available here, so below I summarize the standard due-process protections as applied in international criminal tribunals and then apply them to the two researched items you asked for (the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg and an ICC case). If you want me to match wording from your Section C exactly, paste that section and I’ll integrate it verbatim.


2) Background & purpose — International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg)

Purpose: The Nuremberg International Military Tribunal (IMT), created by the London Agreement of August 1945, was established to try major leaders of Nazi Germany for crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity after World War II. Its goal was both accountability for mass atrocity and to produce authoritative legal findings about the nature of those crimes so they could not be denied or repeated. Holocaust Encyclopedia+1

What it was intended to provide to criminal defendants (due-process elements):

  • A formal, public trial before an independent international tribunal (rather than summary execution or purely domestic proceedings). Holocaust Encyclopedia

  • Rights broadly recognizable as due process for the time: notice of charges, legal counsel, ability to present evidence and call witnesses, and public record of proceedings. Contemporary observers noted the IMT expressly charged itself with conducting fair trials even while trying unprecedented charges. Holocaust Encyclopedia+1

Assessment (general):

  • Strengths: The IMT established a written charter, public hearings, representation for defendants, and a record of evidence and reasoning — foundations for modern international criminal procedure. It articulated and operationalized prosecutions for crimes against humanity and set precedent that individuals (not only states) can be held criminally accountable. Encyclopedia Britannica+1

  • Criticisms/limits: Historians and scholars note issues that would be problematic by today’s standards: allegations of “victor’s justice,” questions about ex post facto character of certain counts (e.g., “crimes against peace”), and the fact that the tribunal was created and staffed by the victorious powers (raising concerns about impartiality). Compared to later courts, some procedural protections were less developed (for example, modern detailed disclosure regimes and clearer, stronger independent appellate protections). WUSTL Open Scholarship Journals+1

Overall: Nuremberg was a major step forward — it provided important due-process elements relative to the alternatives available in the immediate post-war setting — but it had limits when measured against contemporary standards of international criminal procedure.

October 2, 2025

Sustainability and Social Responsibility Analysis

  1. Describe the sustainability practices of a business or organization that you frequently engage with.
    (You can usually find this information online by searching for the name of the business or organization, along with “sustainability strategy” or “environmental goals.”)
  2. How do you think the business or organization is greenwashing? Explain.
  3. How is the business or organization being socially responsible? Explain.

Sustainability and Social Responsibility Analysis

Sustainability and Social Responsibility Analysis

Questions:

  • What sustainability practices does the business or organization implement?,

  • How do these practices impact the environment or community?,

  • In what ways might the business or organization be engaging in greenwashing?,

  • What evidence suggests that some sustainability claims are exaggerated or misleading?,

  • How is the business or organization demonstrating social responsibility?,

  • What initiatives show commitment to employees, community, or ethical practices?,

  • How do sustainability and social responsibility efforts align with the organization’s core mission?,

  • How effective are these efforts in creating tangible environmental or social benefits?,

  • How could the organization improve transparency and accountability in its sustainability efforts?,

  • What lessons can consumers or other businesses learn from this organization’s approach?


Comprehensive General Answer

Sustainability Practices
The business I frequently engage with is Starbucks, a global coffee retailer. Starbucks has implemented several sustainability practices to reduce environmental impact and promote responsible sourcing. These include:

  • Ethical Sourcing: Starbucks sources coffee through its Coffee and Farmer Equity (C.A.F.E.) Practices program, which promotes environmentally friendly farming, fair labor practices, and quality standards.

  • Waste Reduction: Initiatives include offering reusable cups, encouraging recycling, and reducing single-use plastics.

  • Energy Efficiency: Starbucks invests in energy-efficient store designs, LED lighting, and water-saving equipment.

  • Climate Goals: The company has pledged to become resource-positive, aiming to reduce carbon emissions, water usage, and waste by 2030.

Greenwashing Concerns
While Starbucks markets itself as environmentally conscious, some critics argue that the company engages in greenwashing:

  • Plastic Use: Despite promoting reusable cups, most customers still use single-use cups, and Starbucks continues to produce large amounts of disposable packaging.

  • Carbon Claims: Sustainability claims about carbon neutrality are often tied to offset programs, which may not directly reduce emissions at the source.

  • Marketing vs. Reality: Sustainability messaging can sometimes overemphasize small improvements while broader environmental impacts, like global supply chain emissions, remain substantial.

Social Responsibility
Starbucks demonstrates social responsibility in multiple ways:

  • Employee Benefits: The company provides healthcare, stock options, and tuition assistance to employees, promoting well-being and professional development.

  • Community Engagement: Starbucks supports local communities through grants, volunteer programs, and partnerships with nonprofit organizations.

  • Diversity and Inclusion: Initiatives include equity programs, inclusive hiring practices, and anti-discrimination policies.

  • Ethical Sourcing: Beyond environmental benefits, C.A.F.E. Practices ensure fair wages and working conditions for coffee farmers, supporting economic sustainability in sourcing regions.

Conclusion
Starbucks shows a commitment to both sustainability and social responsibility through environmental initiatives, ethical sourcing, and employee/community support. However, greenwashing concerns highlight the importance of transparency and measurable impact. To improve credibility, the company could provide more detailed reporting on the effectiveness of its sustainability programs and work toward tangible reductions in environmental footprint. Sustainability and Social Responsibility Analysis

October 2, 2025
October 2, 2025

Medicare NP Payment Calculations

Health Insurance Calculations – Medicare Non-Physician Provider

Please review the lecture information prior to completing this task. This scenario is for a non-physician provider, such as an N.P. or P.A., who contracts with Medicare.

Use the attached document to complete

WK8 INFO HP-214

Medicare NP Payment Calculations

 

Health Insurance Calculations – Medicare Non-Physician Provider

Please review the lecture information prior to completing this task. This scenario is for a non-physician provider, such as an N.P. or P.A., who contracts with Medicare. More information is available to you in Chapter 9 of your text.

Analyze a scenario to determine monetary responsibility for a visit.

Fill in the blanks in the following payment situations:

Scenario 1

Calculate the following amounts for an NP who bills Medicare as an incident to a supervising physician (billed under the physician’s NPI).

Submitted charge $75

Medicare allowed amount (MPFS) $60

Nurse practitioner allowed amount (100% of MPFS) $

Medicare payment (80 percent of the allowed amount) $

Coinsurance amount (20% allowed amount) $

Provider write-off $

Scenario 2

Calculate the following amounts for an NP who bills Medicare under their own NPI.

Submitted charge $75

Medicare allowed amount (MPFS) $60

Nurse practitioner allowed amount $

(80% of office charge or 85% of MPFS whichever is lower)

Medicare payment (80% of the allowed amount) $

Coinsurance amount $

Provider write-off $ Medicare NP Payment Calculations

  • For Scenario 1, what is the nurse practitioner allowed amount (100% of MPFS)?,

  • What is the Medicare payment (80% of the allowed amount) for Scenario 1?,

  • What is the coinsurance amount (20% of allowed amount) for Scenario 1?,

  • What is the provider write-off for Scenario 1?,

  • For Scenario 2, what is the nurse practitioner allowed amount (80% of office charge or 85% of MPFS, whichever is lower)?,

  • What is the Medicare payment (80% of the allowed amount) for Scenario 2?,

  • What is the coinsurance amount for Scenario 2?,

  • What is the provider write-off for Scenario 2?,

  • How do the calculations differ when billing “incident to” versus under the NP’s own NPI?,

  • How do these calculations affect patient responsibility and provider reimbursement?


Comprehensive General Answer

Scenario 1 – NP Billed “Incident to” Physician

  • Submitted charge: $75

  • Medicare allowed amount (MPFS): $60

  • Nurse practitioner allowed amount (100% of MPFS): $60

  • Medicare payment (80% of allowed amount): 0.8 × $60 = $48

  • Coinsurance amount (20% of allowed amount): 0.2 × $60 = $12

  • Provider write-off: Submitted charge − allowed amount = $75 − $60 = $15

Explanation: When billing “incident to,” the NP is reimbursed at 100% of the MPFS. Medicare pays 80% of the allowed amount, the patient is responsible for the remaining 20%, and the provider cannot collect the difference between the submitted charge and the allowed amount (write-off).


Scenario 2 – NP Billed Under Own NPI

  • Submitted charge: $75

  • Medicare allowed amount (MPFS): $60

  • Nurse practitioner allowed amount (80% of office charge or 85% of