Hi, How Can We Help You?
  • Address: 1251 Lake Forest Drive New York
  • Email Address: assignmenthelpcentral@gmail.com

Blog

September 26, 2023

Court Case Report

Court Case Report

Each student will be given monthly Legal Updates in Modules.  Each student will select a court case to report on.  The following format will be used to describe the selected court case:

  1. Citation
  2. Topic

III. Issue

  1. Facts
  2. Findings
  3. Reasoning

The report on this case should be clear and concise using at least 300 words as you describe this court case.

Case:

COVID-19 (a variety of cases)

(Home School)

Children’s immediate enrollment in a public school was in their best interest absent evidence that their mother (mother and father shared joint custody) was competent to teach them. D.R.D. v. J.D.D. (N.Y. Sup., 158 N.Y.S.3d 549), November 2, 2021. Court Case Report. The Supreme Court, Monroe County (state of New York) held that absent evidence that children were obtaining an “age-appropriate schooling or instruction” and that mother had the pedagogical competence to instruct children, children’s immediate enrollment in public school was in their best interests, on the order to show cause brought by the children’s father. After the children’s mother unilaterally decided to home school the children. The mother offered no evidence of her employment, college degree, experience as a teacher, or any educational training.

Court Case Report

Furthermore, the mother provided no evidence for her assertion that mask-wearing required by the public schools in response to COVID-19 pandemic was unhealthy, there was no evidence that children participation in school activities or were given such an opportunity. In addition, the father’s custodial rights were violated.

(Educational Malpractice – university setting)

Student’s claims against university, arising from education moved online in response to COVID-19, were not barred by educational malpractice doctrine.

Michel v. Yale University (D. Conn., 547 F. Supp. 3d 179), July 7, 2021.

The United States District Court, D. Connecticut stated that student failed to state a claim for a breach of contract against university (Yale) after the university transitioned from in-person teaching to virtual instruction (teaching) in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The university undergraduate regulations provided a “suspension provision” which explicitly reserved the university’s right to temporarily suspend, at its discretion and judgment, its operations in response to emergencies, specifically citing “public health” concerns being among emergencies that might require suspension of operation. Court Case Report. Thus, the university decided to suspend in-person education in light of the COVID-19 pandemic which represented an exercise of its administrative authority as a university, and such authority could not constitute a breach of authority.

(Health)

Court Case Report. Mask mandate generally requires masks in schools to COVID-19 “could not be justified” under the regulation governing disease control measures. Corman v. Acting Secretary of Pennsylvania Dept. of Health (Pa., 266 A.3d 452), December 10, 2021. Note: Many years ago, a relatively old and very experienced school lawyer from Texas shared with me a very good piece of advice and I have never forgotten it and use it very often): Watch (be very attentive to) those cases that come out of Pennsylvania! The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that “Mask mandate” requiring most individuals to wear facial coverings while inside schools as a means of controlling the spread of COVID-19 could “not be justified under “catchall provision” in regulations governing disease control measures, directing the Department of Health or local health authority to take “any other disease control measure” when necessary to protect the public from the spread of infectious diseases. Catchall provision “limit” other available control measures to those appropriate for surveillance of a disease, which meant continuing scrutiny of all aspects of occurrence and spread of the disease that were pertinent to effective control. Masks were a general “prophylactic measure” (preventive measure, treatment, or device) that provided no means by which scrutinize or closely supervise the occurrence and spread of COVID-19 or any disease. Use APA referencing style.

Leave a Reply