October 3, 2025

NASA Collaborative Transformation

Case Study: NASA Collaborative Transformation Assignment

During and before the Apollo program years at NASA, it was the primary government organization involved in all space technology decisions. Since the Space Shuttle Program, NASA has been reinvented. It transformed from a closed system with a hierarchy that develops its technologies internally to an open and collaborative network that promotes innovation and collaboration with other public and private organizations. NASA has become more interdependent.

Using the Moon to Mars Mission (Artemis-Orion), describe this new collaborative approach at NASA.

· Provide a Biblically based support for your analysis

· Sources must be derived from Read items assigned for the Module: Week in which the Case Study is assigned, peer-reviewed journal articles, and your independent research.

· All citations and format must be in current APA format

· Include 8 – 10 sources/REFRENCES, not including your Biblical analysis

· Double-spaced, with 1-inch margins, written in 12-point Times New Roman font.

Paper must be 8-10 pages

NASA Collaborative Transformation

· PDF READINGS ARE ATTACHED SEPARATELY

Using the Moon to Mars Mission (Artemis-Orion) describe this new collaborative approach at NASA.,
Provide a Biblically based support for your analysis.,
Sources must be derived from Read items assigned for the Module: Week in which the Case Study is assigned peer-reviewed journal articles and your independent research.,
All citations and format must be in current APA format.,
Include 8 – 10 sources/references not including your Biblical analysis double-spaced 12-point Times New Roman font with 1-inch margins 8–10 pages.

Comprehensive General Analysis

Introduction

NASA’s organizational transformation reflects a shift from a closed, hierarchical model to an open, collaborative network that leverages partnerships with public and private organizations. During the Apollo era, NASA’s decision-making was centralized, with technology developed internally and limited outside collaboration. The Space Shuttle Program and subsequent missions catalyzed a cultural and operational transformation toward interdependence, collaboration, and innovation.

The Artemis-Orion Mission (Moon to Mars) exemplifies this new approach. NASA now engages private aerospace companies, international partners, academic institutions, and other federal agencies to achieve ambitious exploration goals. This collaborative model aligns with Biblical principles of stewardship, cooperation, and shared responsibility (Ecclesiastes 4:9–10; Proverbs 15:22), underscoring the importance of partnerships for achieving complex missions.

1. NASA’s Collaborative Approach: Artemis-Orion

Public-Private Partnerships: NASA collaborates with companies like SpaceX, Blue Origin, and Lockheed Martin for spacecraft development, launch services, and mission operations. This allows rapid innovation, cost-sharing, and leveraging specialized expertise.
International Collaboration: Artemis involves partnerships with ESA (European Space Agency), JAXA (Japan), and CSA (Canada), fostering global cooperation in technology, research, and exploration objectives.
Interagency Cooperation: NASA works with other federal agencies, including NOAA for Earth monitoring and DoD for communication infrastructure, demonstrating cross-agency collaboration.
Open Innovation and Knowledge Sharing: NASA promotes collaborative problem-solving, hackathons, and open-source initiatives to accelerate innovation and integrate external research into mission planning.

Key Outcomes:

Accelerated technology development, reduced cost through shared resources, and enhanced mission success through diversified expertise.
A shift from isolated decision-making to an interconnected network enables NASA to pursue the Moon to Mars mission more effectively than a strictly hierarchical system.

October 3, 2025

Congressional Clean Lakes Task Force

By Academic Wizard Blog

Congressional Clean Lakes Task Force

Dr. McGinnis was involved in the Clean Lakes Study at Lake Allatoona, Georgia and facilitated the creation of a collaborative network of federal, state, regional, and local agencies, and organizations to guide the study. This effort was nationally recognized model of intergovernmental management promoted throughout the U.S. by the U.S. EPA. Analyze the collaborative effort as a model of intergovernmental management. Use only peer reviewed sources including articles from journals, textbooks, theses/dissertations. Including 8- 10 sources not including your Biblical analysis.

INSTRUCTIONS • Provide a Biblically based support for your analysis • Sources must be derived from Read items assigned for the Module: Week in which the Case Study is assigned, peer-reviewed journal articles, and your independent research. • All citations and format must be in current APA format • Include 8 – 10 sources, not including your Biblical analysis • Double-spaced, with 1-inch margins, written in 12-point Times New Roman font. • Paper must be 8-10 pages

Analyze the collaborative effort as a model of intergovernmental management.,
Provide a Biblically based support for your analysis.,
Use only peer reviewed sources including articles from journals textbooks theses/dissertations.,
Include 8 – 10 sources not including your Biblical analysis.,
Ensure paper is 8–10 pages APA formatted double-spaced 12-point Times New Roman with 1-inch margins.

Comprehensive General Analysis

Introduction

The Clean Lakes Study at Lake Allatoona, Georgia, led by Dr. McGinnis, represents one of the most recognized intergovernmental collaborations in environmental management. By bringing together federal, state, regional, and local agencies, as well as community stakeholders, this initiative became a nationally recognized model promoted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Intergovernmental management is increasingly critical for addressing complex environmental challenges, since water quality, pollution, and watershed management cross political and jurisdictional boundaries.

From a Biblical perspective, stewardship of natural resources aligns with the mandate in Genesis 2:15, where humankind is called to “work it and take care of” the Garden. Collaborative governance also reflects the principle of mutual accountability and cooperation, as seen in Ecclesiastes 4:9–10, which stresses that two are better than one, for they lift each other up.

This case study evaluates the Lake Allatoona Clean Lakes Task Force as a model of intergovernmental management, drawing on scholarship about collaborative governance, federalism, and environmental policy.

1. Collaborative Effort as Intergovernmental Management

The Clean Lakes Task Force demonstrates how multi-level governance can function in practice:

Federal Role (EPA): Provided funding, oversight, and recognition, ensuring that best practices could be scaled nationally.
State Agencies: Georgia’s environmental and natural resource agencies coordinated water quality standards, ensuring compliance with federal guidelines.
Regional/Local Entities: Local governments, watershed organizations, and community stakeholders provided contextual knowledge, direct monitoring, and on-the-ground management.
Academia and Experts: Dr. McGinnis and university partners facilitated knowledge transfer, scientific analysis, and neutral leadership for collaboration.

This multi-tier collaboration reflects the principles of network governance, where no single authority dominates but instead partners share resources, expertise, and responsibilities.

Congressional Clean Lakes Task Force

2. Benefits of the Intergovernmental Collaboration

Holistic Problem-Solving: Pollution control and watershed management require cooperation beyond jurisdictional lines. The Clean Lakes Task Force fostered joint action to address nutrient loading, sedimentation, and nonpoint source pollution.
Efficiency: Pooling federal funding with state implementation capacity and local knowledge created efficient use of limited resources.
Legitimacy and Trust: Inclusion of local stakeholders built public trust, which is crucial for long-term compliance and environmental stewardship.
Scalability: The model was replicated nationwide, showing the importance of flexible but coordinated intergovernmental strategies.

3. Challenges of Collaboration

Jurisdictional Conflicts: Differing priorities among federal, state, and local actors often required mediation.
Resource Disparities: Smaller local agencies lacked technical expertise compared to federal and state counterparts.
Coordination Costs: Collaborative governance requires significant time, communication, and negotiation.
Sustainability: Maintaining long-term intergovernmental partnerships often depends on continued funding and leadership commitment.

4. Clean Lakes Task Force as a Model

The Clean Lakes program exemplifies a policy network where shared governance produced sustainable outcomes. Scholars of intergovernmental relations (Agranoff & McGuire, 2001) describe such efforts as “collaborative public management,” emphasizing flexibility, negotiation, and shared leadership.

Key features of this model:

Interagency Coordination: Aligning federal, state, and local priorities under a common environmental goal.
Participatory Governance: Involving local stakeholders to ensure decisions reflect community needs.
Adaptive Management: Using scientific data and continuous monitoring to adjust strategies.
Shared Accountability: Distributing responsibilities across government levels.

October 3, 2025

Disaster Collaboration Networks

By Academic Wizard Blog

Disaster Collaboration Networks

INSTRUCTIONS • Provide a Biblically based support for your analysis • Sources must be derived from Read items assigned for the Module: Week in which the Case Study is assigned, peer-reviewed journal articles, and your independent research. • All citations and format must be in current APA format • Include 8 – 10 sources, not including your Biblical analysis • Double-spaced, with 1-inch margins, written in 12-point Times New Roman font. • (Note: Case Study: Federal/State/Local Collaboration Networks in Disasters Assignment must be 10-12 pages).

Address each of the following questions related to federal-state-local collaboration during disasters. 1. Should there be national goals and strong federal direction, as during the period of “creative federalism,” or greater flexibility for state and local officials to target funds and efforts where they feel there is the greatest need? 2. What would happen if the federal role in emergency management was simply reduced to providing financial support? 3. How likely is it that state representatives will address the state’s major hazards without federal encouragement? 4. What are the advantages of developing local capabilities to reduce hazards? How likely is it that local officials will address risks to life and property without outside funding and support?

Disaster Collaboration Networks

Should there be national goals and strong federal direction as during the period of “creative federalism” or greater flexibility for state and local officials to target funds and efforts where they feel there is the greatest need?,
What would happen if the federal role in emergency management was simply reduced to providing financial support?,
How likely is it that state representatives will address the state’s major hazards without federal encouragement?,
What are the advantages of developing local capabilities to reduce hazards?,
How likely is it that local officials will address risks to life and property without outside funding and support?

Comprehensive General Analysis

Introduction

Disaster management in the United States has evolved over time as federal, state, and local governments seek to balance roles and responsibilities in protecting life and property. Events such as Hurricane Katrina, 9/11, and more recent disasters demonstrate the importance of coordinated collaboration. Questions of federal leadership versus local flexibility remain central to the debate on how to structure emergency management. From a Biblical perspective, the call for stewardship (1 Peter 4:10), mutual aid (Galatians 6:2), and wise leadership (Proverbs 11:14) aligns with the need for strong, cooperative networks across all levels of government.

1. National Goals and Federal Direction vs. Local Flexibility

Argument for strong federal direction:

A unified set of national goals ensures consistency, equity, and the ability to mobilize resources across state lines.
Historical examples, such as the era of “creative federalism” in the 1960s, show how strong federal leadership can direct funds efficiently to nationwide priorities.

Argument for flexibility:

State and local governments have first-hand knowledge of their communities and are better positioned to prioritize resources based on specific regional risks.
Overly centralized control may ignore unique local vulnerabilities.

Balanced approach:

The most effective model blends national priorities with local adaptability. The federal government should establish broad frameworks and funding guidelines, while states and localities tailor implementation.
Biblically, this reflects the principle of shared responsibility: “Two are better than one… if either of them falls down, one can help the other up” (Ecclesiastes 4:9–10).

2. If Federal Role Were Reduced to Financial Support

A purely financial federal role would weaken national capacity for coordination, technical expertise, and standardization of disaster responses.
The absence of leadership could lead to duplication of efforts, slower response times, and disparities in preparedness among states.
National security threats (e.g., terrorism, pandemics, cyberattacks) require more than funding—they demand unified strategy and intelligence-sharing, which only federal agencies can provide.
From a Biblical standpoint, Proverbs 29:18 notes, “Where there is no vision, the people perish.” Financial support without leadership vision could compromise long-term safety and resilience.

October 3, 2025

Ideals of American Democracy

By Academic Wizard Blog

Ideals of American Democracy

The fundamental values that inform how are democratic government is legitimated and organized are enshrined in the Declaration of Independence and in the Constitution of the United States. These principles and founding documents, along with a discussion of other founding documents like the Articles of Confederation, Federalist papers, Bill of Rights, are discussed in the first and second chapters of MindTap.

Studying these democratic principles and ideals, as well as our founding documents, can help position you for success not only in this course, but also as you prepare to take the FCLE (Florida Civic Literacy Exam) in the future!

In this 1,000-word minimum essay, your goal will be the following:

“To identify and discuss the basic ideals and principles of American democracy and how they are applied in our republican form of government.”

Please complete BOTH parts of this essay:

1st part of essay

· Briefly describe the democratic ideals and principles expressed in our nation’s founding documents.

· Analyze how these principles and ideals have shaped America as a constitutional republic.

2nd part of essay

· Briefly differentiate among our nation’s founding documents – including the Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation, Constitution, Bill of Rights, and Federalist Papers.

· Explain the role of each of these documents in the founding of the United States. Ideals of American Democracy

Briefly describe the democratic ideals and principles expressed in our nation’s founding documents.,
Analyze how these principles and ideals have shaped America as a constitutional republic.,
Briefly differentiate among our nation’s founding documents – including the Declaration of Independence Articles of Confederatio Constitution Bill of Rights and Federalist Papers.,
Explain the role of each of these documents in the founding of the United States.,
Identify and discuss the basic ideals and principles of American democracy and how they are applied in our republican form of government.

Comprehensive General Essay (minimum 1,000 words)

Introduction

The United States was founded on a set of democratic ideals and principles that continue to serve as the foundation of its political system. These ideals, captured in the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and other founding documents, define not only how the government operates but also how it is legitimized by the consent of the governed. To understand American democracy, one must examine these guiding principles, the influence they had in shaping the United States as a constitutional republic, and the role each founding document played in creating the framework of government.

October 3, 2025

Data Governance & Database Design

By Academic Wizard Blog

Data Governance & Database Design

. As HIM director of a healthcare system, you have been appointed to a team of individuals to develop a rationale for a Data Governance (DG) program. In one of the first team meetings the agenda is to discuss and develop a list of key factors for DG program success and explain why each is critical for achieving a viable DG program.

a. Create the supporting document that will be presented at an Executive meeting to help the CEO and other executives decide about how to structure the DG program. (25 points)

2. Many hospitals need to track trends about patient outcomes to improve healthcare delivery. However, they often lack the tools necessary to achieve that goal. At University Hospital, the database management systems (DBMS) administrator is responsible for creating and maintaining databases. Several departments have asked him to develop real-time analytics and visualizations to track patient trends. These real-time analytics and visualizations would be based on standard simple queries. They also want to keep track of all the data they document and have had trouble creating a system that is modeled well for easy access.

a. Evaluate if the DBMS administrator should choose a NoSQL database or a relational database for real-time analytics and visualization?

b. For the system the database administrator must build to track all the data University Hospital documents, what are the database design steps the database administrator should follow to ensure the information is organized and stored for easy access? Please describe each step. Data Governance & Database Design

As HIM director of a healthcare system you have been appointed to a team of individuals to develop a rationale for a Data Governance (DG) program. In one of the first team meetings the agenda is to discuss and develop a list of key factors for DG program success and explain why each is critical for achieving a viable DG program.,
Create the supporting document that will be presented at an Executive meeting to help the CEO and other executives decide about how to structure the DG program. (25 points),
Many hospitals need to track trends about patient outcomes to improve healthcare delivery. However they often lack the tools necessary to achieve that goal. At University Hospital, the database management systems (DBMS) administrator is responsible for creating and maintaining databases. Several departments have asked him to develop real-time analytics and visualizations to track patient trends. These real-time analytics and visualizations would be based on standard simple queries. They also want to keep track of all the data they document and have had trouble creating a system that is modeled well for easy access.,
Evaluate if the DBMS administrator should choose a NoSQL database or a relational database for real-time analytics and visualization?,
For the system the database administrator must build to track all the data University Hospital documents, what are the database design steps the database administrator should follow to ensure the information is organized and stored for easy access? Please describe each step.

October 3, 2025

Nuremberg & Lubanga

By Academic Wizard Blog

Nuremberg & Lubanga

Review the Due Process in Proceedings Before International Criminal Tribunals in Section C on page 124 of your text.
- Select either the International Military Tribunals in Nuremberg or the International Military Tribunals in Tokyo and conduct research involving either one of these Tribunals.
- Provide a background of the purpose of these Tribunals and what each was intended to provide to criminal defendants.
- Offer your assessment of the success of the Tribunal in accordance with the commitment to protection of Due Process Rights of Human Criminal Defendants.

I also need help in the following

Conduct research and locate a case that involves either pretrial rights or trial rights that was heard in the international arena before the International Criminal Court.
- Provide a brief summary of the main issues, the pretrial and trial process, and the outcome of the case.
- Discuss how the case reflects the defendant being provided with five pretrial rights or trial rights.
- Provide specific examples of these rights in action during the specific case you researched and selected. Nuremberg & Lubanga

Review the Due Process in Proceedings Before International Criminal Tribunals in Section C on page 124 of your text.,
Select either the International Military Tribunals in Nuremberg or the International Military Tribunals in Tokyo and conduct research involving either one of these Tribunals.,
Provide a background of the purpose of these Tribunals and what each was intended to provide to criminal defendants.,
Offer your assessment of the success of the Tribunal in accordance with the commitment to protection of Due Process Rights of Human Criminal Defendants.,
Conduct research and locate a case that involves either pretrial rights or trial rights that was heard in the international arena before the International Criminal Court; provide a brief summary of the main issues, the pretrial and trial process, and the outcome of the case; discuss how the case reflects the defendant being provided with five pretrial rights or trial rights; provide specific examples of these rights in action during the specific case you researched and selected.

Answers — comprehensive (general)

1) Quick note about the textbook instruction

I don’t have your specific textbook or the exact page 124 Section C available here, so below I summarize the standard due-process protections as applied in international criminal tribunals and then apply them to the two researched items you asked for (the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg and an ICC case). If you want me to match wording from your Section C exactly, paste that section and I’ll integrate it verbatim.

2) Background & purpose — International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg)

Purpose: The Nuremberg International Military Tribunal (IMT), created by the London Agreement of August 1945, was established to try major leaders of Nazi Germany for crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity after World War II. Its goal was both accountability for mass atrocity and to produce authoritative legal findings about the nature of those crimes so they could not be denied or repeated. Holocaust Encyclopedia+1

What it was intended to provide to criminal defendants (due-process elements):

A formal, public trial before an independent international tribunal (rather than summary execution or purely domestic proceedings). Holocaust Encyclopedia
Rights broadly recognizable as due process for the time: notice of charges, legal counsel, ability to present evidence and call witnesses, and public record of proceedings. Contemporary observers noted the IMT expressly charged itself with conducting fair trials even while trying unprecedented charges. Holocaust Encyclopedia+1

Assessment (general):

Strengths: The IMT established a written charter, public hearings, representation for defendants, and a record of evidence and reasoning — foundations for modern international criminal procedure. It articulated and operationalized prosecutions for crimes against humanity and set precedent that individuals (not only states) can be held criminally accountable. Encyclopedia Britannica+1
Criticisms/limits: Historians and scholars note issues that would be problematic by today’s standards: allegations of “victor’s justice,” questions about ex post facto character of certain counts (e.g., “crimes against peace”), and the fact that the tribunal was created and staffed by the victorious powers (raising concerns about impartiality). Compared to later courts, some procedural protections were less developed (for example, modern detailed disclosure regimes and clearer, stronger independent appellate protections). WUSTL Open Scholarship Journals+1

Overall: Nuremberg was a major step forward — it provided important due-process elements relative to the alternatives available in the immediate post-war setting — but it had limits when measured against contemporary standards of international criminal procedure.

October 2, 2025

Sustainability and Social Responsibility Analysis

By Academic Wizard Blog

Sustainability and Social Responsibility Analysis

Describe the sustainability practices of a business or organization that you frequently engage with.
(You can usually find this information online by searching for the name of the business or organization, along with “sustainability strategy” or “environmental goals.”)
How do you think the business or organization is greenwashing? Explain.
How is the business or organization being socially responsible? Explain.

Sustainability and Social Responsibility Analysis

Questions:

What sustainability practices does the business or organization implement?,
How do these practices impact the environment or community?,
In what ways might the business or organization be engaging in greenwashing?,
What evidence suggests that some sustainability claims are exaggerated or misleading?,
How is the business or organization demonstrating social responsibility?,
What initiatives show commitment to employees, community, or ethical practices?,
How do sustainability and social responsibility efforts align with the organization’s core mission?,
How effective are these efforts in creating tangible environmental or social benefits?,
How could the organization improve transparency and accountability in its sustainability efforts?,
What lessons can consumers or other businesses learn from this organization’s approach?

Comprehensive General Answer

Sustainability Practices
The business I frequently engage with is Starbucks, a global coffee retailer. Starbucks has implemented several sustainability practices to reduce environmental impact and promote responsible sourcing. These include:

Ethical Sourcing: Starbucks sources coffee through its Coffee and Farmer Equity (C.A.F.E.) Practices program, which promotes environmentally friendly farming, fair labor practices, and quality standards.
Waste Reduction: Initiatives include offering reusable cups, encouraging recycling, and reducing single-use plastics.
Energy Efficiency: Starbucks invests in energy-efficient store designs, LED lighting, and water-saving equipment.
Climate Goals: The company has pledged to become resource-positive, aiming to reduce carbon emissions, water usage, and waste by 2030.

Greenwashing Concerns
While Starbucks markets itself as environmentally conscious, some critics argue that the company engages in greenwashing:

Plastic Use: Despite promoting reusable cups, most customers still use single-use cups, and Starbucks continues to produce large amounts of disposable packaging.
Carbon Claims: Sustainability claims about carbon neutrality are often tied to offset programs, which may not directly reduce emissions at the source.
Marketing vs. Reality: Sustainability messaging can sometimes overemphasize small improvements while broader environmental impacts, like global supply chain emissions, remain substantial.

Social Responsibility
Starbucks demonstrates social responsibility in multiple ways:

Employee Benefits: The company provides healthcare, stock options, and tuition assistance to employees, promoting well-being and professional development.
Community Engagement: Starbucks supports local communities through grants, volunteer programs, and partnerships with nonprofit organizations.
Diversity and Inclusion: Initiatives include equity programs, inclusive hiring practices, and anti-discrimination policies.
Ethical Sourcing: Beyond environmental benefits, C.A.F.E. Practices ensure fair wages and working conditions for coffee farmers, supporting economic sustainability in sourcing regions.

Conclusion
Starbucks shows a commitment to both sustainability and social responsibility through environmental initiatives, ethical sourcing, and employee/community support. However, greenwashing concerns highlight the importance of transparency and measurable impact. To improve credibility, the company could provide more detailed reporting on the effectiveness of its sustainability programs and work toward tangible reductions in environmental footprint. Sustainability and Social Responsibility Analysis

October 2, 2025

Medicare NP Payment Calculations

By Academic Wizard Blog

Medicare NP Payment Calculations

Health Insurance Calculations – Medicare Non-Physician Provider

Please review the lecture information prior to completing this task. This scenario is for a non-physician provider, such as an N.P. or P.A., who contracts with Medicare.

Use the attached document to complete

WK8 INFO HP-214

Health Insurance Calculations – Medicare Non-Physician Provider

Please review the lecture information prior to completing this task. This scenario is for a non-physician provider, such as an N.P. or P.A., who contracts with Medicare. More information is available to you in Chapter 9 of your text.

Analyze a scenario to determine monetary responsibility for a visit.

Fill in the blanks in the following payment situations:

Scenario 1

Calculate the following amounts for an NP who bills Medicare as an incident to a supervising physician (billed under the physician’s NPI).

Submitted charge $75

Medicare allowed amount (MPFS) $60

Nurse practitioner allowed amount (100% of MPFS) $

Medicare payment (80 percent of the allowed amount) $

Coinsurance amount (20% allowed amount) $

Provider write-off $

Scenario 2

Calculate the following amounts for an NP who bills Medicare under their own NPI.

Submitted charge $75

Medicare allowed amount (MPFS) $60

Nurse practitioner allowed amount $

(80% of office charge or 85% of MPFS whichever is lower)

Medicare payment (80% of the allowed amount) $

Coinsurance amount $

Provider write-off $ Medicare NP Payment Calculations

For Scenario 1, what is the nurse practitioner allowed amount (100% of MPFS)?,
What is the Medicare payment (80% of the allowed amount) for Scenario 1?,
What is the coinsurance amount (20% of allowed amount) for Scenario 1?,
What is the provider write-off for Scenario 1?,
For Scenario 2, what is the nurse practitioner allowed amount (80% of office charge or 85% of MPFS, whichever is lower)?,
What is the Medicare payment (80% of the allowed amount) for Scenario 2?,
What is the coinsurance amount for Scenario 2?,
What is the provider write-off for Scenario 2?,
How do the calculations differ when billing “incident to” versus under the NP’s own NPI?,
How do these calculations affect patient responsibility and provider reimbursement?

Comprehensive General Answer

Scenario 1 – NP Billed “Incident to” Physician

Submitted charge: $75
Medicare allowed amount (MPFS): $60
Nurse practitioner allowed amount (100% of MPFS): $60
Medicare payment (80% of allowed amount): 0.8 × $60 = $48
Coinsurance amount (20% of allowed amount): 0.2 × $60 = $12
Provider write-off: Submitted charge − allowed amount = $75 − $60 = $15

Explanation: When billing “incident to,” the NP is reimbursed at 100% of the MPFS. Medicare pays 80% of the allowed amount, the patient is responsible for the remaining 20%, and the provider cannot collect the difference between the submitted charge and the allowed amount (write-off).

Scenario 2 – NP Billed Under Own NPI

Submitted charge: $75
Medicare allowed amount (MPFS): $60
Nurse practitioner allowed amount (80% of office charge or 85% of

October 2, 2025

Course Feedback Reflection

By Academic Wizard Blog

Course Feedback Reflection

All students are requested to complete this survey. It provides valuable information to meet your needs better, improve our courses, and provide a better overall student experience – one of the Three Pillars of Excellence upon which the University of Arkansas Grantham is built. If you have not yet completed your survey (these are needed for every course), please do so now. It is needed for the Discussion prompt.;

Share what you feel is the most valuable suggestion for improvement. Share what you are comfortable sharing about your course learning experience. Ensure you place this suggestion in the survey comment section.Course Feedback Reflection

Have you completed the end-of-course survey?,
What do you feel is the most valuable suggestion for improving this course?,
What aspects of your course learning experience would you like to share?,
Where should you place your suggestion within the survey?,
How has this course contributed to your learning and professional development?,
What specific changes or improvements would enhance the student experience in this course?,
How do you feel the course met your expectations and learning objectives?,
How can the feedback you provide help improve future course offerings?,
Are there resources or support that you found particularly helpful during the course?,
How can the course structure, assignments, or instruction be improved for clarity or engagement?

Comprehensive General Answer

Reflection on Course Experience and Survey Feedback

Completing the end-of-course survey is an important opportunity to provide feedback that can improve both the course and the overall student experience at the University of Arkansas Grantham. The survey allows students to voice their perspectives and contribute to the university’s goal of delivering high-quality, effective learning experiences.

Most Valuable Suggestion for Improvement
One of the most valuable suggestions for improvement is to increase interactive opportunities during the course, such as more real-time discussions, case studies, or practical exercises. These activities help students apply theoretical knowledge in a simulated environment and enhance understanding of complex topics. Including additional examples or scenario-based assignments could also support diverse learning styles and deepen comprehension.

Course Learning Experience
Throughout this course, I appreciated the balance between technical instruction and professional skill development. Assignments, discussions, and resources provided a clear pathway for building both subject matter expertise and soft skills, which are essential for employment success. I found that structured feedback from instructors and the availability of tutoring services were particularly helpful in reinforcing my understanding of key concepts.

Placement of Suggestion
My suggestion for improvement has been entered in the comment section of the survey, as requested. This ensures that my feedback is recorded formally and considered during course evaluations and future revisions.

Contribution to Professional Development
The course has contributed to my professional development by enhancing both my technical competencies and employability skills. Assignments such as mock interviews and discussion responses helped build confidence, communication skills, and critical thinking. Overall, the course structure and content effectively supported my growth as a student and as a future professional.

October 2, 2025

Mock Interview Reflection

By Academic Wizard Blog

Mock Interview Reflection

During this certificate program, you have spent a considerable amount of time working on employment strategies. You likely decided to return to school because you know education is the best path to employment. Employers are looking for employees with solid skill sets, the ability to learn, and the soft skills to be good employees.

The skillset comes with the courses, the ability to learn is shown by passing the courses and mastering the soft skills we have both included in coursework and exemplified by our actions. Soft skills are those things that make good employees. Soft skills in medical coding are personal and interpersonal skills that help medical coders perform effectively in their roles beyond technical coding knowledge. Reflect on some of these soft skills that speak to you:

· Attention to detail

· Communication skills

· Time management

· Patience and Persistence

· Adaptability

· Confidentiality and Ethics

· Teamwork and Collaboration

Good employees arrive to work on time, work hard during paid hours, treat everyone with dignity and respect, and are honest and trustworthy.

Assignment Instructions

Mock Interview: When you’re ready to do your mock interview, select the Live Tutoring link on the course menu and follow this video tutorial, Interview Practice – Career Services (01:44).

· Be sure to use the voice chat Mock Interview Reflection

· Ask to do a practice interview for a medical billing and coding position

· There is no need to schedule this, just log in to Tutor.com whenever you’re ready to complete the practice interview

Write a reflection on this entire process and submit it to the assignment drop box. This reflection should be one to two pages long and address points that were listed above as the soft skillset. College writing should always have a proper sentence structure, grammar, and spelling.

What was your overall experience completing the mock interview?,
How did you demonstrate attention to detail during the interview?,
How did your communication skills impact your performance?,
How did time management patience and persistence play a role in your interview?,
How did adaptability confidentiality and ethics come into play during the interview?,
How did teamwork and collaboration skills influence your responses or engagement?,
What did you learn about your strengths and areas for improvement through the mock interview process?,
How will this experience prepare you for a real medical billing and coding interview?,
How did the mock interview reinforce the importance of soft skills in employment?,
How will you apply these insights to future job-seeking or professional development efforts?

Previous page 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 … 464 Next page

Category Archives: Blog

Comprehensive General Analysis

Introduction

1. NASA’s Collaborative Approach: Artemis-Orion

Comprehensive General Analysis

Introduction

1. Collaborative Effort as Intergovernmental Management

2. Benefits of the Intergovernmental Collaboration

3. Challenges of Collaboration

4. Clean Lakes Task Force as a Model

Comprehensive General Analysis

Introduction

1. National Goals and Federal Direction vs. Local Flexibility

2. If Federal Role Were Reduced to Financial Support

Ideals of American Democracy

Comprehensive General Essay (minimum 1,000 words)

Introduction

Answers — comprehensive (general)

1) Quick note about the textbook instruction

2) Background & purpose — International Military Tribunal (Nuremberg)

Comprehensive General Answer

Health Insurance Calculations – Medicare Non-Physician Provider

Scenario 1

Scenario 2

Comprehensive General Answer

Comprehensive General Answer