Hi, How Can We Help You?
  • Address: 1251 Lake Forest Drive New York
  • Email Address: assignmenthelpcentral@gmail.com

Blog

June 2, 2025
June 2, 2025

Assignment Goal Statement

The goal of this assignment is to build upon knowledge learned in the Advanced Physical Assessment course and to provide PMHNP students with an opportunity to apply their clinical interviewing skills in a structured, simulated environment. Students will engage in a 20-25 minute session with a standardized patient to gather a comprehensive history, including current symptomatology (onset, duration, progression, etc.), past medical and psychiatric history, and relevant psychosocial factors. This assignment is designed to support student learning by providing thoughtful and thorough feedback to identify strengths and areas for improvement. Feedback from faculty will help students refine their interviewing techniques, improve clinical decision-making, and build confidence in conducting psychiatric assessments in preparation for future clinical practice.

Assignment Goal Statement

 

Purpose:

Strong interviewing techniques are crucial for PMHNPs in gathering accurate patient information and building therapeutic relationships. Effective and accurate documentation of patient care is an essential skill for PMHNP students. Based on their interaction with a standardized patient, the student will apply interviewing techniques to complete a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation, ensuring clarity, accuracy, and professionalism in their documentation.

Plan:

The PMHNP student will schedule a time to conduct a virtual simulated (Telehealth) office visit with a standardized patient. , The standardized patient will be experiencing symptoms from a mental health diagnosis covered in either Module 3 or Module 4. , During the office visit the PMHNP student will collect from the standardized patient  a comprehensive history including current symptomatology (onset duration progression etc.) past medical and psychiatric history and relevant psychosocial factors. ,

After the visit the PMHNP student will complete documentation based on their interaction with the standardized patient., Students should use knowledge taught in their Advanced Physical Assessment course and the lectures from Modules 1 & Modules 2 inside MH707.,  Students will use the adult psychiatric evaluation template to document their assessment, ensuring the write-up accurately reflects their clinical observations and findings., As part of this documentation the student will also formulate a psychiatric diagnosis based on the assessment data gathered during the simulated visit.,

June 1, 2025

Healthcare Quality Improvement Discussions

Healthcare organizations use various Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Quality Metrics to measure performance. This activity allows you to practice researching and using data to inform quality improvement decisions. For this discussion board:

1. Select one healthcare quality metric from the list below: Healthcare Quality Improvement Discussions

· Hospital Readmission Rates

· Patient Satisfaction Scores (HCAHPS)

· Length of Stay (LOS)

· Hospital-Acquired Infections (HAIs)

2. Research a U.S.-based healthcare organization that publicly reports performance data on this metric (such as CMS Hospital Compare or Leapfrog Group). Healthcare Quality Improvement Discussions

Healthcare Quality Improvement Discussions

3. Share a brief summary of how the organization performs on this metric and suggest one improvement strategy based on your readings.

4. Review and respond to at least  two peers’ posts. Provide thoughtful and constructive feedback by addressing the following points:

· Were their baseline metrics and key findings clearly presented?

· Did their analysis identify logical areas for improvement?

· Are there any additional insights or alternative interpretations you can offer?

PIQ#4Discusion 4

Note: followed two responses

Your initial response must be a minimum of 300 words.

Imagine you are a Quality Improvement Specialist at a hospital facing increased patient discharge times, leading to patient dissatisfaction and operational inefficiencies. Your role is to identify the underlying cause and propose a solution using appropriate process improvement models.

· Use the Root Cause Analysis (RCA) approach to identify potential reasons for the delayed discharges. Consider factors such as workflow inefficiencies, staff communication breakdowns, or administrative bottlenecks.

· Based on your RCA findings, provide one practical recommendation to address the root cause you identified.

· Choose a classmate’s response and propose a different process improvement model to approach the issue from a new perspective. Explain why your selected model might be beneficial in this situation.

PIQ#5Discusion 5

Note: followed two responses

Your initial response must be a minimum of 300 words.

Leadership and organizational culture play a pivotal role in the success of quality improvement initiatives.,

1. Reflect on a healthcare leader (real or fictional) you admire who has successfully led a quality improvement initiative.,

2. Identify one leadership style (e.g. transformational transactional servant) that influenced the success of the initiative.,

3. Discuss one organizational culture trait (e.g. teamwork transparency accountability) that supported or hindered the quality improvement effort.,

PIQ#6 Discussion 6 Healthcare Quality Improvement Discussions,

Note: followed two responses

Your initial response must be a minimum of 300 words. Healthcare Quality Improvement Discussions

Patient safety events (such as medication errors, falls, or hospital-acquired infections) are common challenges in healthcare. For this week’s discussion:

1. Research a real-life case of a patient safety event in the U.S. healthcare system. Examples can be found through news outlets, hospital reports, or the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).

· Be sure to provide a link and properly cite the source where you found your example.

2. Summarize the event and identify what went wrong.

3. Propose one evidence-based strategy to prevent that type of error in the future.

PIQ#7 Discussion 7

Note: followed two responses

Your initial response must be a minimum of 300 words

Healthcare organizations often face  ethical dilemmas during quality improvement initiatives. Common dilemmas include:

· Balancing cost reduction with patient safety

· Data privacy and protection

· Allocating limited resources

· Implementing new policies that may inconvenience staff

Select one ethical dilemma scenario above. Apply  one ethical principle (such as beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, or justice) to propose a solution.

June 1, 2025
June 1, 2025

Week 3: Group Assignment #3 – Project Charter Measurement Phase

Purpose of Activity:

This assignment focuses on the “Measure” phase of your Quality Improvement Initiative Charter, where you will develop a data collection plan and identify key performance indicators (KPIs) to assess the success of your project. By completing this assignment, you will enhance your ability to plan systematic data collection and establish meaningful metrics aligned with project goals.

Steps to Complete Activity:

1. Meet with your group to reflect on your project’s problem statement and objectives to ensure alignment with the data you plan to collect and the metrics you establish.

2. Develop a Data Collection Plan by specifying:

Project Charter Measurement Phase

· Methods of data collection (e.g., surveys, observations, electronic records).

· Tools or resources needed for data collection.

· Frequency of data collection.

· Individuals or teams responsible for collecting and managing the data.

3. Identify Metrics:

· Define 2-4 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that will measure the success of your project.

· Explain how each KPI aligns with your project objectives.

· Provide the rationale for choosing these metrics and describe how they will be used to track progress.

4. Use process mapping technique s to visualize current workflows.

5. Develop a measurement plan outlining:

· Data collection methods

· Tools (e.g., run charts, SPC charts)

· Frequency of data collection

· Short summary report explaining your approach.

Submission Details: Length: 1–3 pages, double spaced

Week 4: Group Assignment#4 – Project Charter Analysis and Improve Phase

Purpose of Activity:

The purpose of this assignment is to apply analytical tools to identify the root causes of a healthcare quality issue, propose data-driven solutions to address these causes, and develop a structured implementation plan for your proposed solutions. This exercise will help you develop critical thinking, collaborative problem-solving skills, and the ability to connect root causes to actionable improvements in real-world healthcare settings. By completing this assignment, you will ensure that the solutions you propose are practical, achievable, and aligned with quality improvement principles.

Steps to Complete Activity:

1. Select and Apply Root Cause Analysis Tools: As a group, choose an analytical tool to identify the root causes of a healthcare quality issue.

· You may use one of the following tools:

· Fishbone Diagram (Ishikawa Diagram)

· Root Cause Analysis (RCA)

· Process Mapping

· Ensure that the tool you select is well-suited for the healthcare quality issue you’re addressing.

· Use the selected tool to identify the key root causes of the problem.

2. Conduct the Root Cause Analysis:

· Document the process of applying the chosen tool to your healthcare issue. Outline the steps taken and describe the outcomes of your analysis.

· Summarize the findings by clearly articulating the root causes of the quality issue. Be sure to highlight the key factors contributing to the issue.

3. Create a  Root Cause Analysis Report:

· Include  visuals such as a Fishbone Diagram, Process Map, or another relevant tool that helps illustrate the root cause analysis.

· Provide a summary  of the findings with a clear explanation of the identified root causes.

· Use data and insights from your analysis to support your findings.

4. Propose Evidence-Based Solutions:

· Use the insights from your root cause analysis to propose data-driven solutions to address the identified issues.

· Ensure that tproposed solutions are specific, actionable, and aligned with established quality improvement principles (e.g., Lean, Six Sigma).

· The proposed solutions should address the root causes directly and focus on improving the quality of care while being feasible in a real-world healthcare setting.

5. Develop an Implementation Strategy:

· Stakeholder Involvement: Identify key stakeholders (e.g., healthcare providers, patients, administration) and describe how they will be involved in the implementation of your proposed solutions.

· Expected Outcomes: Outline the expected outcomes of implementing your solutions, including improvements in patient care, efficiency, or other key metrics.

· Plan of Action: Break down the implementation strategy into  specific,  logical, and  sequential steps. Each step should be designed to drive your solutions from concept to execution.

· Example: Step 1: Develop a training program for staff. Step 2: Pilot the new process in one department.

· Timeline: Create a timeline that outlines the major steps of the implementation process. Include key  milestones and  deadlines for each stage of the plan.

· Responsibilities: Clearly assign  responsibilities for each step of the implementation plan. Indicate who in your group, or which stakeholder, will be responsible for completing each task.

5. Example: Responsible Party: [Team Member A] will lead the staff training. [Team Member B] will oversee the pilot implementation..

Additional Technology:

As part of this assignment, you will need to create a visual (e.g., Fishbone Diagram, Root Cause Analysis chart, or Process Map) to support your findings. Below are two user-friendly tools you can use, along with tutorials to guide you:

1. Canva (Free Online Tool): Canva offers free templates you can customize to create clean, professional diagrams.

· Visit  https://www.canva.comLinks to an external site.

· Sign in or create a free account

· Search for terms like “Fishbone Diagram” or “Process Map”

· Choose a template, customize it, and download your diagram as an image or PDF to insert into your report

2. Microsoft PowerPoint

· PowerPoint allows you to build your own diagram using shapes or SmartArt tools.

· Open PowerPoint and go to  Insert > SmartArt

· Choose  Hierarchy or  Process graphics depending on the diagram type

· You can also use  Insert > Shapes to create custom layouts

· Once complete, right-click to  Save as Picture and insert it into your Word report

Submission Details: Length: 1–3 pages, double spaced

Week 5: Group Assignment#5 – Project Charter Control Phase

Purpose of Activity:

The purpose of this assignment is to develop a sustainability plan and monitoring strategy to ensure that healthcare process improvements are maintained over time and evaluated effectively.

Steps to Complete Activity:

1. Meet with your team to propose strategies and monitoring methods,

· Describe how the implemented improvement plan will be maintained over time.,

2. Discuss potential barriers to sustainability and how they can be addressed.,

· Outline a plan for tracking and evaluating progress regularly.,

· Include specific metrics data collection methods and reporting frequency.,

· Describe how monitoring results will be communicated to stakeholders and used to make adjustments if necessary.,

3. One person from your group must submit the assignment by Sunday at 11:59pm ET.

· Be sure to include the name of your group and add the names of each group member.

Submission Details: Length: 1–3 pages, double spaced

Week 7: Assignment – Submit Final Project – Charter Paper

Purpose of Activity:

This final assignment integrates all prior coursework into a complete Quality Improvement Project Charter. You will synthesize your work, summarize your findings, and provide actionable recommendations. This comprehensive document and presentation serve as a demonstration of your understanding of quality improvement principles and your ability to apply them in a healthcare setting.

Steps to Complete Activity:

1. As a group, assemble all phases of DMAIC (all previous group assignments from weeks 3-7) into a single, cohesive document.

2. Add a conclusion and executive summary:

· Restate the project’s goals, methodologies, findings, and anticipated impact.

· Highlight future actions or considerations to ensure continued success and address any remaining gaps.

3. Include an appendix, if applicable

· Include supporting visuals such as fishbone diagrams, process maps, data tables, or monitoring plans.

· Provide references or citations for any external sources used.

Submission Details:

· Length: 8–10 pages (not including title page or references), double spaced.

· File Format: Upload the document as a  Word file.

Week 8: Assignment#8 Final Project – Charter Presentation

Overview

Congratulations on completing your Quality Improvement Project! This assignment marks the culmination of weeks of effort, collaboration, and application of critical quality improvement principles. Together, you’ve navigated the DMAIC process, explored Lean and Six Sigma methodologies, and developed innovative strategies to address real-world healthcare challenges.

For this final step, you will showcase your work by creating a narrated PowerPoint presentation and sharing it with your peers. Engaging with your classmates’ presentations will provide an opportunity to exchange ideas, offer constructive feedback, and gain new perspectives on quality improvement in healthcare.

Instructions

1. Create a  10- to 15-minute narrated PowerPoint presentation summarizing your Quality Improvement Project Charter. Ensure your presentation includes the following:

· A brief introduction to the project and its significance.

· Key elements from each DMAIC phase (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control).

· Visuals (e.g., process maps, data charts, fishbone diagrams) to support your discussion.

· A concise conclusion summarizing goals, findings, and next steps.

2. Post Your Presentation:

· Upload your narrated PowerPoint as a video or share a link to the file in the discussion board thread.

· Include a brief text summary (3–4 sentences) in your post to provide context for your presentation.

3. Engage with Your Peers:

· Watch each groups’ narrated PowerPoint presentation and provide thoughtful and constructive feedback. When providing feedback, address the following points:

· Were the proposed solutions practical and actionable?

· Did the presentation offer any innovative approaches or unique insights?

· What did you find most compelling or effective about the presentation?

· Are there any areas for improvement or additional considerations?

Submission Details

· One person from your group must post your group’s narrated PowerPoint by Saturday at 11:59pm ET.

· Each student must watch each group’s presentation and provide feedback. Each response must be a  minimum of 200 words. Responses to your peers are due by Sunday at

June 1, 2025
June 1, 2025

Effective Job Interview Strategies

Landing the perfect job or hiring the perfect employee hinges on a good interview. It’s the ultimate meet-and-greet, a chance for both sides to size each other up and see whether it’s a good fit. This assignment examines different interview methods, their pros and cons, and how to develop a successful interview strategy. Sometimes, companies may even combine the different methods of interviewing to create their interview strategy. Mastering the art of the interview, whether you’re the one asking the questions or answering them, is an important way to learn about jobs, the job market, candidate preferences, and many other factors that make a good fit. Effective Job Interview Strategies

Effective Job Interview Strategies

Please review the following article: Interview Methods and Types: Advantages and Disadvantage Effective Job Interview Strategies

  • Which interview method do you like the most and why?,
  • What are the advantages and disadvantages of the interview method?,
  • Companies may also use a combination of interview methods to build an interview strategy., Which methods would you combine and why? Effective Job Interview Strategies,

Landing the perfect job or hiring the perfect employee hinges on a good interview., It’s the ultimate meet-and-greet, a chance for both sides to size each other up and see whether it’s a good fit. This assignment examines different interview methods, their pros and cons, and how to develop a successful interview strategy. Sometimes, companies may even combine the different methods of interviewing to create their interview strategy. Mastering the art of the interview, whether you’re the one asking the questions or answering them, is an important way to learn about jobs, the job market, candidate preferences, and many other factors that make a good fit.

Please review the following article: Interview Methods and Types: Advantages and Disadvantage

  • Which interview method do you like the most and why?
  • What are the advantages and disadvantages of the interview method?
  • Companies may also use a combination of interview methods to build an interview strategy. Which methods would you combine, and why?
June 1, 2025
June 1, 2025

Evaluating Unreliable Research Sources

Find an article in the area of your particular research project that does not strike you as credible. A general internet search might be a good way to find such an article. Evaluating Unreliable Research Sources

Attach a copy of the article to a short 2-3 page analysis that addresses… Evaluating Unreliable Research Sources

· What is/are the issue(s) the author considers?

· What is the author’s thesis?

· How does the author attempt to support the thesis?

Evaluating Unreliable Research Sources

· Is persuasion evident?  Is there an evident bias? Evaluating Unreliable Research Sources

· What are the specific flaws in the article and how might you respond to the author’s points with better research and argumentation? (Perhaps you could cite another source you have found which better presents the truth of the matter.)

Article Critique

Find an article in the area of your particular research project that does not strike you as credible. A general internet search might be a good way to find such an article.

Attach a copy of the article to a short 2-3 page analysis that addresses…

· What is/are the issue(s) the author considers? ,

· What is the author’s thesis? ,

· How does the author attempt to support the thesis? ,

· Is persuasion evident?  Is there an evident bias?,

· What are the specific flaws in the article and how might you respond to the author’s points with better research and argumentation?, (Perhaps you could cite another source you have found which better presents the truth of the matter.)

Article Critique

Find an article in the area of your particular research project that does not strike you as credible. A general internet search might be a good way to find such an article.

Attach a copy of the article to a short 2-3 page analysis that addresses…

· What is/are the issue(s) the author considers?

· What is the author’s thesis?

· How does the author attempt to support the thesis?

· Is persuasion evident?  Is there an evident bias?

· What are the specific flaws in the article and how might you respond to the author’s points with better research and argumentation? (Perhaps you could cite another source you have found which better presents the truth of the matter.)

June 1, 2025
June 1, 2025

Application of Coase Theorem

INSTRUCTIONS:

By utilizing the required readings as a base, compose a paper citing appropriate examples/principles from the texts and include a minimum of TWO (2) academic peer reviewed scholarly journal articles (citations) that bring depth and insight to the paper and at LEAST ONE (1) Bible verse quote. The word count of the citations (cites) and the Bible quote do NOT count in the paper’s word count. The paper should focus directly on the posed deliverables. Scripture should be interwoven into the fabric of your paper.Application of Coase Theorem

Application of Coase Theorem

Citation and Reference of Peer Reviewed Journal Articles Application of Coase Theorem

Peer reviewed (also called “scholarly” or “academic”) journals are publications in which all the articles have been vetted by one or more experts to ensure that they conform to good practices of scholarship. Unlike most magazine articles, peer reviewed articles nearly always contain citations to back up the author’s thesis. Please read the detailed definition flowing from the California Polytechnic State University. Application of Coase Theorem

Many of you have not been taught how to cite/reference peer reviewed journal articles using the APA writing style. In order to understand how to cite/reference peer reviewed journal articles using the APA writing style, please note the following: Application of Coase Theorem

The RU Library has the APA Manual in print form:   http://library.regent.edu/record=b1700245~S0

The APA has an abbreviated free guide on their website:  http://www.apastyle.org/  Application of Coase Theorem

Additionally, as for bearing down on citing/referencing correctly in APA, the  The Purdue Owl :  https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/section/2/10/  has really established itself as the dominant website for APA style citations/references and even has a good  YouTube video on the basics of APA style  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdAfIqRt60c&feature=youtu.be

Below is an example of a page taken from the Purdue Owl:Application of Coase Theorem

https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/10/

Moreover, the RU University Writing Center

http://www.regent.edu/admin/stusrv/writingcenter/home.cfm  has many kind instructors who love teaching citation/reference skills to Regent Students. Please use this learning resource, it is free.

Last, but not least; you may contact the RU Business Librarian:

Harold Henkel | Business & Leadership Librarian

Regent University Library | Mail Drop 119

1000 Regent University Drive

Virginia Beach, VA 23464

Tel: 757-352-4198 | Fax: 757-352-4167

harohen@regent.edu

Per Brother Henkel, peer reviewed articles may be easily found in the RU Library’s business databases. On the advanced search screen, simply check the box for scholarly/peer reviewed articles, and the database will return only this type of article. For business research, he recommends starting off with Business Source Complete and ABI Inform Complete .

A Peer Reviewed Article Defined:

The California Polytechnic State University, Robert E. Kennedy Library defines a peer-reviewed article as follows:

A peer-reviewed article is published in a peer-reviewed journal only after it has been subjected to multiple critiques by scholars in that field. Peer-reviewed journals follow this procedure to make sure that published articles reflect solid scholarship and advance the state of knowledge in a discipline.

These articles present the best and most authoritative information that disciplines have to offer. Also, through the careful use of citations, a peer-reviewed article allows anyone who reads it to examine the foundation of the claims made in the article. Peer-reviewed articles lead to many articles in a chain of information.

Are scholarly and peer-reviewed articles the same thing?

Peer-reviewed and scholarly journals are related but not identical. Not all scholarly journals go through the peer-review process. However, one can assume that a peer-reviewed journal is scholarly.

How can I tell if an article is a peer-reviewed article?

First of all, make sure it is an ARTICLE (not a textbook). Not everything that appears in a peer-reviewed journal is an article. Peer-reviewed journals also contain items such as editorials and book reviews, and these are not subjected to the same level of critique.

The presence of several of the following traits often indicates that an article is peer-reviewed:

· A lot of citations: these may appear in-text, and/or as footnotes, endnotes, works cited, reference list, bibliography.

· An Abstract (brief description of the article)

· The organization of the article into discrete sections such as Methodology, Results, and Conclusion.

· Charts, tables, or graphs.

· Complex, formal language that is specific to the field.

· Notes indicating when article was submitted and when it was accepted.

Please note the following Grading Guidelines for Case Study Papers:

There are certain expectations that transcend the grading of a paper in this class. The syllabus states that students are to follow the APA Writing Style & Formatting Guidelines.

The papers are somewhat subjective; therefore, grade reduction usually results from the paper lacking one or more of the following:

Did not include a separate Title Page = minus 3 points

Did not include a separate Reference Page = minus 3 points

Did not include one peer reviewed journal article citations = minus 3 points

Note: a Textbook, Wikipedia, Investopedia, etc. are NOT peer reviewed

Did not include a quoted and APA cited Bible Scripture (complete verse) = minus 10 points

If you have technical problems with Canvas, please contact the Help Desk/IT department.  You may e-mail the Help Desk at: helpdesk@regent.edu  or call at (757) 226-4076.

These APA additions, references, citations and quotes are NOT a part of the word count that should be at least 300 words. In APA style, citations are in-text references that point to a full citation in the reference list at the end of the paper. References are the full entries for each source used in the paper, providing details for readers to locate the source. Quotes are passages taken verbatim from a source, and in APA, they are cited with an in-text citation and, if the quote is 40 words or more, formatted as a block quote.

Moreover, a paper exceeding 700 words will result in a grade reduction.

Submit your assignment by clicking the title link. Simply click on the link, then type in your comments to the Professor if you have any, click on Browse and attach the Word Document with your assignment from your hard drive. Make sure to click Submit to send your assignment to your instructor.

Please copy/paste the following URLs for information on Scholarly and Peer-Reviewed Articles

What are Scholarly and Peer-Reviewed Articles?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDBGzKXoFis&feature=youtu.be

Finding Scholarly and Peer-Reviewed Articles

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3y_2wzCS0c&feature=youtu.be

DELIVERABLES: “Coase Theorem”

Utilizing the RU Library resources and www; research work by Dr. Ronald Coase (who won a Nobel Prize for his work) appertaining to what is known as the “Coase Theorem”. Some economists see this theorem as a tautology, while others see it as powerfully insightful.

Respond to the following questions. Please do not write a narrative. Your paper should concisely express salient points of interest for each question in the order denoted.

1. Research and explain the Coase Theorem. ,

2. Discuss how practical it may be for two entities (individuals corporations etc.) to meet the criterion that Professor Coase outlines. ,

3. Describe a personal example of a time when you created or were impacted by a positive or negative externality., Would Prof. Coase’s approach have helped in your case? , If not what other remedies might be available?,

Note: if you are unable to come up with an example; let me provide some thoughts: e.g. exhaust emanating from a nearby (or even distant) car;

second hand smoke; or you save money by pouring your used motor oil in a sewer; or any aspect of the drug trade.

Your only limitation to the content of this paper is your imagination.

2 | Page

June 1, 2025
June 1, 2025
Recent Employment Discrimination Case

Review the following

Recent Employment Discrimination Case

The laws and regulations on hiring and managing talent are dynamic and impact today’s practices. Case law helps define today’s federal hiring practices, and what might have been acceptable in the past may not be so today. Research a recent case law for discrimination. For assistance, you can refer to U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionLinks to an external site. website. The “Newsroom” section of this website provides recent developments of discrimination cases in the US and will help with your research into recent cases of employment discrimination.,

Identify the case of discrimination. Recent Employment Discrimination Case,

  • Explain the specific type of discrimination.,
  • Summarize the case issue findings and outcome.,
  • Explain how the findings from the case are applied to today’s practices.,

3 pages apa at least 2 sources

Review the following Recent Employment Discrimination Case

The laws and regulations on hiring and managing talent are dynamic and impact today’s practices. Case law helps define today’s federal hiring practices, and what might have been acceptable in the past may not be so today. Research a recent case law for discrimination. For assistance, you can refer to U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionLinks to an external site. website. The “Newsroom” section of this website provides recent developments of discrimination cases in the US and will help with your research into recent cases of employment discrimination.

Identify the case of discrimination.

  • Explain the specific type of discrimination.
  • Summarize the case issue, findings, and outcome.
  • Explain how the findings from the case are applied to today’s practices.

3 pages apa at least 2 sources .Recent Employment Discrimination Case

June 1, 2025
June 1, 2025

Theories of Police Behavior

You must submit a 3-4 page summary of the assigned readings from this week. This is not the appropriate place to discuss whether or not you enjoyed the material but is instead a means to assess whether or not you understood the material well enough to briefly summarize it. In other words, do not make your own argument in the summary papers (you will do that on your exam answers), instead summarize the study or key arguments the author(s) is making.

Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows. Atlantic Monthly, 249(3), 29-38. (uploaded in the File section of Webcourses)

Theories of Police Behavior

Crank, J. P., & Langworthy, R. (1992). Institutional perspective on policing. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 83, 338-363

Klinger, D. A. (1997). Negotiating order in patrol work: An ecological theory of police response to deviance. Criminology, 35(2), 277-306.

Moskos, P. (2008). Cop in the hood: My year policing Baltimore’s eastern district. Princeton University Press.

You must submit a 3-4 page summary of the assigned readings from this week. This is not the appropriate place to discuss whether or not you enjoyed the material but is instead a means to assess whether or not you understood the material well enough to briefly summarize it. In other words, do not make your own argument in the summary papers (you will do that on your exam answers), instead summarize the study or key arguments the author(s) is making.

Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows. Atlantic Monthly, 249(3), 29-38. (uploaded in the File section of Webcourses)

Crank, J. P., & Langworthy, R. (1992). Institutional perspective on policing. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 83, 338-363 Theories of Police Behavior

Klinger, D. A. (1997). Negotiating order in patrol work: An ecological theory of police response to deviance. Criminology, 35(2), 277-306. Theories of Police Behavior

Moskos, P. (2008). Cop in the hood: My year policing Baltimore’s eastern district. Princeton University Press.

You must submit a 3-4 page summary of the assigned readings from this week., This is not the appropriate place to discuss whether or not you enjoyed the material but is instead a means to assess whether or not you understood the material well enough to briefly summarize it., In other words do not make your own argument in the summary papers (you will do that on your exam answers), Summarize the study or key arguments the author(s) is making. Theories of Police Behavior,

Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows. Atlantic Monthly, 249(3), 29-38. (uploaded in the File section of Webcourses)

Crank, J. P., & Langworthy, R. (1992). Institutional perspective on policing. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 83, 338-363

Klinger, D. A. (1997). Negotiating order in patrol work: An ecological theory of police response to deviance. Criminology, 35(2), 277-306.

Moskos, P. (2008). Cop in the hood: My year policing Baltimore’s eastern district. Princeton University Press.

June 1, 2025
June 1, 2025

Foundations: Social Media and Depression

Scholarly Sources and the Walden Library

Scholarly information comes from a wide variety of sources including academic books, encyclopedias, handbooks, and journals. “Scholarly” is a broad term for publications written by and for researchers and scholars. These publications are typically not found in your local bookstore or public library because they are written for a very specific audience. They are mostly available in university and specialized libraries, not freely available online. This is why it is essential to learn to navigate the Walden Library and use it often! Social Media and Depression

Social Media and Depression

 

During your time at Walden, you will be focusing on peer reviewed journal articles, a specific type of scholarly publication that goes through a specialized review process. These types of articles may report on original research or review the work of other researchers. Social Media and Depression,

As you use the Walden Library to search the peer reviewed literature to support your discussion posts and assignments it is important to understand how the Library is organized., Most modern libraries make their materials available electronically through searchable databases., Here in the Walden Library you have access to specialized academic databases many of which are specific to psychology and the social and behavioral sciences. Social Media and Depression,

As part of this week’s Discussion you will explore the databases in the Walden Library and compare and contrast peer reviewed articles found in these databases to those found online. Social Media and Depression,

Learning Resources Social Media and Depression

This page contains the Learning Resources for this week. Be sure to scroll down the page to see all of this week’s assigned Learning Resources.

Required Resources

Readings

· OASIS. (2020, June 29).  Reading a research article assigned as coursework Links to an external site. . Walden University. https://waldenacademicskills.wordpress.com/2020/06/29/reading-a-research-article-assigned-as-coursework

· Walden University. (2015d).  Evaluating resources: Resource typesLinks to an external site. . Retrieved from http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating This web page provides specific information about evaluating various types of resources.

· Walden University. (2015e).  Foundations – library resources: Identifying & evaluating online resourcesLinks to an external site. . Retrieved from http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/IdentifyingEvaluating This web page gives you an introduction to the types of information you will find in the library databases. It provides tips on how to identify scholarly sources, such as peer-reviewed journal articles, and how to evaluate the reliability of other sources.

· Walden University. (2015g).  Foundations – library resources: Searching & retrieving materials in the databasesLinks to an external site. . Retrieved from http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/SearchingRetrieving This resource is an introduction to finding the sources you need in the Walden library databases.

· Walden University. (2015j).  Publication comparison chart: PublicationsLinks to an external site. . Retrieved from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/peerreviewvsscholarly This web page defines and contrasts three categories of journals: scholarly, trade, and popular.

· Walden University. (2015i).  Peer review: General informationLinks to an external site. . Retrieved from http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/peer-review This web page provides general information about how to limit periodical searches to peer-reviewed articles and how to verify a periodical is peer reviewed.

· Walden University. (2015f).  Foundations – library resources: Introduction to the Walden University libraryLinks to an external site. . Retrieved from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/foundationscoursedocs/waldenlibrary The Walden Library an essential resource that will facilitate your success. This web page introduces you to the library’s services and resources.

· Document:  Study Notes: What Is Critical Thinking? (PDF) Download Study Notes: What Is Critical Thinking? (PDF) This Walden Writing Center publication explores various definitions of critical thinking.

· Spreadsheet:  Weekly Schedule (Excel) Download Weekly Schedule (Excel)

One of the most valuable skills you can have as an online student is effective time management. Therefore, we ask that you

· download and save this sample weekly schedule,

· use it to create your own based on your work and personal responsibilities, and

· revisit the schedule at least once a month to ensure that it still reflects your time commitments.

To Prepare for this Discussion:

· Review Learning Resources for this week and familiarize yourself with navigating the Walden Library, searching Library databases, and limiting your searches to full text, peer review, and publication date.

· Search the “APA PsycINFO database” in the Walden Library and locate a peer reviewed article on a psychology topic you would like to explore relevant to your area of specialization in your program.

· Next, search the Internet and locate an article related to the same topic.

· Reflect on the sources of both articles, and evaluate each article using the evaluation methods listed in the Learning Resources.

INSTRUCTIONS: With these thoughts in mind:

Post a brief description of the articles you found. Next, compare and contrast the articles and explain the differences you noticed between them. Further explain how the use of peer review articles will improve the arguments  in your scholarly writing. As a professional in the field of psychology, which article would you use as evidence to support your ideas? Provide the article title and journal name for the article you find in the Library and the URL for the article you found online.

Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to this week’s Learning Resources.