Hi, How Can We Help You?
  • Address: 1251 Lake Forest Drive New York
  • Email Address: assignmenthelpcentral@gmail.com

Blog

June 25, 2025
June 25, 2025

Weekly Clinical Reflection

Describe your clinical experience for this week.

  • Did you face any challenges, any success? If so, what were they?
  • Describe the assessment of a patient, detailing the signs and symptoms (S&S), assessment, plan of care, and at least 3 possible differential diagnosis with rationales.
  • Mention the health promotion intervention for this patient.
  • What did you learn from this week’s clinical experience that can beneficial for you as an advanced practice nurse?
  • Support your plan of care with the current peer-reviewed research guideline.

Weekly Clinical Reflection

Submission Instructions:

  • Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.

Weekly Clinical Reflection

  1. Did you face any challenges or successes during clinical this week?,

  2. What were the signs and symptoms assessment and plan of care for your patient?,

  3. What are three possible differential diagnoses with rationales?,

  4. What health promotion intervention was used?,

  5. What did you learn that will benefit your advanced practice nursing role?


📝 Weekly Clinical Experience Reflection

This week’s clinical rotation offered an insightful experience that challenged my diagnostic and patient management skills while reinforcing the value of holistic care. One of the most notable encounters involved a 72-year-old male patient who presented with complaints of progressive fatigue, dyspnea on exertion, and occasional palpitations over the past three weeks. He denied chest pain, cough, fever, or lower extremity swelling. His past medical history included hypertension and osteoarthritis.


🌡️ Patient Assessment and Clinical Findings

Subjective (S):

  • Chief Complaint: “I feel exhausted even when walking short distances.”

  • Associated Symptoms: Dizziness, palpitations, mild headaches

  • ROS: Denied syncope, fever, cough, GI bleeding, or recent weight loss

Objective (O):

  • Vitals: BP 134/78 mmHg, HR 102 bpm (irregular), Temp 98.7°F, RR 18, O2 sat 96% RA

  • General: Pale, slightly fatigued but alert

  • Cardiac: Irregularly irregular rhythm, no murmurs

  • Pulmonary: Clear to auscultation

  • Abdomen: Soft, non-tender

  • Skin: Mild pallor noted

  • Labs: CBC revealed Hemoglobin 9.0 g/dL, MCV 78 fL, Ferritin 10 ng/mL, TSH within normal limits

Weekly Clinical Reflection

🩺 Assessment and Plan of Care

Assessment:
The patient was diagnosed with iron-deficiency anemia, likely secondary to chronic gastrointestinal blood loss.

Plan of Care:

  1. Initiate iron supplementation (Ferrous sulfate 325 mg PO BID with vitamin C)

  2. Order FOBT to assess for occult GI bleeding

  3. Schedule colonoscopy for further investigation

  4. Nutritional counseling for iron-rich diet

  5. Educate on medication adherence and follow-up importance

  6. Re-evaluate CBC in 4 weeks


🧠 Differential Diagnoses and Rationales

  1. Iron-Deficiency Anemia

    • Most consistent with patient’s fatigue, low hemoglobin, microcytic anemia (low MCV), and low ferritin. Common in elderly due to chronic GI loss.

  2. Anemia of Chronic Disease

    • Typically presents with normocytic or slightly microcytic anemia; less likely due to low ferritin, which is usually elevated in chronic disease.

  3. Atrial Fibrillation

    • Suggested by irregular heart rate and palpitations; could contribute to symptoms but is more likely secondary or concurrent than primary diagnosis. Requires ECG confirmation and further cardiac evaluation.


💡 Health Promotion Intervention

Health promotion included dietary education to encourage consumption of iron-rich foods (e.g., spinach, red meat, lentils) and avoidance of calcium-rich foods with iron supplements. The patient was also advised on hydration, medication compliance, and the importance of routine screenings for colorectal cancer, especially in the presence of unexplained anemia.


👩‍⚕️ Clinical Takeaways as an APRN

This week reinforced the importance of comprehensive assessment and the integration of subtle clinical signs to guide diagnostic reasoning. I learned to prioritize patient education and preventive screening, particularly in older adults at risk for hidden pathologies such as GI bleeding or malignancy. It also deepened my understanding of collaborative care—working with gastroenterologists, nutritionists, and pharmacists to support the patient’s full recovery.

June 25, 2025
June 25, 2025

Anemia SOAP Note

Patient came in for being anemic. Was having episodes of dizziness and light headedness. Patient is a 68 year female. Married to a male with type 2 diabetes. 2 children with no issues. Patient have a history of 1 surgery 15 years ago removing a cyst in an ovary.

Anemia SOAP Note

A SOAP note is a method of documentation employed by healthcare providers to record and communicate patient information in a clear, structured, and in an organized manner. This assignment will provide students with the necessary tools to document patient care effectively, enhance their clinical skills, and prepare them for their roles as competent healthcare providers.

Instructions:

SOAP is an acronym that stands for Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan. The episodic SOAP note is to be written using the attached template below.

For all the SOAP note assignments, you will write a SOAP note about one of your patients and use the following acronym:

S = Subjective data: Patient’s Chief Complaint (CC).
= Objective data: Including client behavior, physical assessment, vital signs, and meds.
A = Assessment: Diagnosis of the patient’s condition. Include differential diagnosis.
P = Plan: Treatment, diagnostic testing, and follow up

Click here to access and download the SOAP Note Template Download Click here to access and download the SOAP Note Template

 

Submission Instructions:

· Your SOAP note should be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspellings.

· You must use the template provided. Turnitin will recognize the template and not score against it.

Anemia SOAP Note

  1. What is the patient’s chief complaint (CC)?,

  2. What are the patient’s objective clinical findings (vitals, meds, physical exam)?,

  3. What is the working diagnosis and differential?,

  4. What is the plan for treatment and follow-up?,

  5. How should this be formatted using the SOAP method?


📝 SOAP Note (Based on Provided Info)

S – Subjective:
Chief Complaint: “I’ve been feeling dizzy and lightheaded lately.”
68-year-old female presents with complaints of dizziness and lightheadedness. She reports intermittent episodes over the past week. She denies syncope, chest pain, or shortness of breath. No history of recent falls. She notes fatigue and a general sense of weakness. No melena, hematochezia, or abnormal bleeding. Denies dietary changes or significant weight loss.

Past Medical History:

  • One surgical procedure 15 years ago to remove an ovarian cyst

  • No history of chronic illnesses

  • Married to a husband with type 2 diabetes

  • Two children without medical concerns

O – Objective:
Vital Signs:

  • BP: 108/72 mmHg

  • HR: 92 bpm

  • RR: 16/min

  • Temp: 98.6°F

  • O2 Sat: 98% RA

Physical Exam:

  • General: Alert and oriented x3, appears fatigued

  • Cardiovascular: Regular rate and rhythm, no murmurs

  • Pulmonary: Clear to auscultation bilaterally

  • Abdomen: Soft, non-tender, no organomegaly

  • Neuro: Cranial nerves II–XII intact, no focal deficits

  • Skin: Pale, no bruising or petechiae

Labs (if available):

  • CBC: Hemoglobin 9.2 g/dL, Hematocrit 28%, MCV 70 fL (microcytic anemia)

  • Iron studies pending

Medications:

  • Multivitamin OTC daily

  • No other medications reported

A – Assessment:
Primary Diagnosis: Iron-deficiency anemia (likely)
Differential Diagnoses:

  1. Anemia of chronic disease

  2. Gastrointestinal blood loss

  3. Vitamin B12 or folate deficiency

  4. Myelodysplastic syndrome (age-related concern)

June 25, 2025
June 25, 2025

Nursing Philosophy and DNP Role

explanation of your philosophy of nursing practice. Include your nursing experience and expertise.  Kindly explain the underlying tenets that support your philosophy of nursing practice and your goals for expanding your experience and practice as a DNP (e.g., embracing diversity, global health issues, and collaboration). Include how these dynamics are linked to the DNP’s role as a social change agent.  Include a recommendation for at least one way to advocate for positive social change as a Walden DNP. Be specific and provide examples, with all citations in APA 7 style.  This work must be well supported with professional references from the course and peer-reviewed journals. Outside articles are to be published no earlier than 2019. Your main post needs to be submitted by Wednesday

Nursing Philosophy and DNP Role

Nursing Philosophy and DNP Role

  • What is your personal philosophy of nursing practice?,

  • What experiences and expertise support this philosophy?,

  • How do you plan to expand your practice as a DNP?,

  • What is the DNP’s role in social change?,

  • How can you advocate for positive social change at Walden?

My Philosophy of Nursing Practice

My philosophy of nursing is grounded in holistic, patient-centered care, rooted in compassion, evidence-based practice, and social responsibility. I believe nursing is both a science and an art—a dynamic profession committed to alleviating suffering, restoring health, and advocating for the vulnerable. My approach emphasizes dignity, empathy, cultural competence, and clinical excellence across diverse populations.

With over a decade of clinical experience in acute care and community health settings, I’ve developed expertise in chronic disease management, health education, and interdisciplinary collaboration. These experiences have shaped my belief that nursing care must be adaptive, inclusive, and equitable to effectively meet the needs of individuals and communities in today’s complex healthcare environment.


Core Tenets Supporting My Nursing Philosophy

  1. Humanistic Care and Compassion
    Inspired by Jean Watson’s Theory of Human Caring, I regard every patient interaction as an opportunity for connection, healing, and trust-building (Watson, 2020). This perspective centers on the idea that caring relationships are foundational to effective health outcomes.

  2. Evidence-Based Practice and Lifelong Learning
    My commitment to integrating current research and clinical guidelines ensures that patient care is informed, safe, and effective. As a nurse practitioner, I continuously pursue professional development to remain aligned with the latest standards of practice (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2023).

  3. Health Equity and Cultural Competence
    I firmly believe that addressing social determinants of health is not optional—it’s a moral and professional obligation. Cultural humility and awareness of systemic disparities shape how I approach assessment, diagnosis, and treatment, particularly in underserved populations (Campinha-Bacote, 2020).


Goals as a DNP: Embracing Diversity and Driving Change

As I advance toward a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degree at Walden University, my goal is to become a transformative leader who influences practice, policy, and population health. The DNP role uniquely prepares nurses to:

  • Promote diversity by developing culturally responsive care models that reflect the needs of marginalized communities.

  • Engage with global health issues such as infectious disease outbreaks and chronic disease disparities through telehealth and international collaborations.

  • Lead interdisciplinary teams to design systems-level solutions that improve care quality and access.

By mastering these areas, I intend to influence healthcare delivery beyond individual encounters and into broader systems that shape community health.

Nursing Philosophy and DNP Role

The DNP as a Social Change Agent

The DNP-prepared nurse is positioned to drive social change by combining clinical expertise with advocacy and leadership. This role goes beyond bedside care, extending to policy reform, program development, and systems-level improvement. According to Zaccagnini and Pechacek (2021), DNPs are uniquely equipped to identify gaps in care and implement innovations that promote justice, access, and health equity.

For example, in Miami-Dade County, where I practice, high rates of hypertension and diabetes disproportionately affect Black and Hispanic populations. A DNP might lead a community outreach initiative that partners with faith-based organizations to deliver screenings and culturally tailored education programs. By combining epidemiological data with community engagement, the DNP becomes a catalyst for measurable change.

 

June 25, 2025
June 25, 2025

Assistive Tech & AAC Advocacy

Please read the directions carefully as this is a two-part assignment. For the first part you must create an interview the school district for reference is in Miami-Dade County. This is due within 28 hours.

Assistive Tech & AAC Advocacy

Part 1:

The use of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) allows students with moderate to severe disabilities to communicate with others regardless of their condition. Technology provides students with the tools necessary to meet their educational needs, as well as a way to connect with those around them. Understanding how AAC works best for each age group or disability can help an educator make the best decisions for students. Allocate at least 1.5 hour in the field to complete this assignment.

In person, or via phone or internet-based communication such as FaceTime, Zoom, or Skype but not email, interview two individuals involved in the learning of students with moderate to severe disabilities. The interviewees can include special education teachers, special education directors, parents/families of special education students, or technology personnel at the district or state level that work with special education. Discuss the individual’s training and experience with students who use augmentative communication tools. Take notes, as these interviews will be submitted as part of the assignment deliverable. In your interviews, discuss the following:

· The individual’s experience working with students with moderate to severe disabilities, including the prevalence of various types of disabilities they have encountered in their work.

Assistive Tech & AAC Advocacy

· At least one assistive technology (AT) and one augmentative communication (AC) tool that could be used to assist students with moderate to severe disabilities with their communication needs.

· How, specifically, would this individual advocate for and support future use of both AT and AAC for students who require assistive technology and augmentative communication.

After your interviews, write a 250-500 word reflection in which you discuss what you have learned from the interactions. Describe how you plan to advocate for the use of assistive technology and augmentative communication tools to support instruction and learning in your future professional practice.

Submit your interview notes and reflection to the learning management system

Part 2: (For this please look at the attached document entitled “Sally Case Study “ ) Background to information to use about myself is that I am a Secondary Teacher within Miami-Dade I am family oriented etc…

Teachers of students with moderate to severe disabilities need to be able to identify the unique needs of their students and the best strategies for promoting their success in the classroom setting. These teachers should also strive for positive, open, and regular communication with their students’ families, which will allow them to collaborate in advocating for the students to achieve their fullest potential.

Assistive Tech & AAC Advocacy

For this assignment, using the “Sally Case Study,” write a 500-750 word letter to the student’s family in which you do the following:

· Identify six unique needs of the student in the case study.

· For each unique need, identify one strategy (instructional, positioning, communication, etc.) you or other teachers can use to support student success in the classroom setting.

· To promote self-advocacy, identify three ways the student can use assistive technology to create a digital presentation about herself to contribute during their IEP process.

· Identify three community resources, conferences, learning opportunities, or organizations the student’s family could use when advocating for and seeking assistance in meeting their child’s educational needs.

· Conclude by explaining how you will follow-up with the parents/guardians about their child’s progress in the classroom throughout the year and about upcoming community events.

Your letter should have an introduction to your family including personal information about yourself, professional information, and the reason for the letter. Conclude the letter with your contact information and times you can be reached.

Support your letter with at least two scholarly resources.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide

  • What are the experiences of professionals working with students with moderate to severe disabilities?,

  • ,What assistive technology (AT) and augmentative communication (AAC) tools do they recommend?,

  • How do these professionals advocate for the continued use of AT and AAC?,

  • What did you learn from interviewing them, and how will you apply it in your future practice?,

  • What are the six unique needs of Sally, and how can each be addressed?

June 25, 2025
June 25, 2025

Rip and Rosicky Compared

Write a comparison or contrast essay about two of the corresponding characters in the table below. You will choose three of the points of comparison from the pool below as your points of comparison or contrast. Keep in mind that the purpose of a comparison or contrast essay is to reveal something meaningful about the characters and their relationships to the text. The three topics that I choose are Relationship with others, sense of adventure and conflicts/trials faced. The piece is about Anton Rosicky and Rip Van Winkle from the short stories Rip van Winkle and Neighborhood Rosicky. The thesis statement should include: While some differences between Rip Van Winkle and Anton Rosicky are evident, they are similar in the aspects of Relationship with others, Sense of Adventure and Conflicts/Trials Face. There should be citations and no research policy all research should be from the short stories. 1000 words.

Rip and Rosicky Compared

Rip and Rosicky Compared

  1. What are the similarities in how Anton Rosicky and Rip Van Winkle relate to others?,

  2. How does each character demonstrate a sense of adventure?,

  3. What types of conflicts or trials do the characters face?,

  4. How do these characters’ experiences shape their personal growth or lack thereof?,

  5. What meaningful insights about human nature and values do these similarities reveal?


Comparison Essay: Rip Van Winkle & Anton Rosicky

Thesis Statement:
While some differences between Rip Van Winkle and Anton Rosicky are evident, they are similar in the aspects of relationship with others, sense of adventure, and conflicts/trials faced.


Introduction
Short stories often introduce readers to characters whose lives, decisions, and values mirror or contrast each other in ways that reveal deeper themes about human nature. Washington Irving’s Rip Van Winkle and Willa Cather’s Neighbour Rosicky present two such characters. Rip Van Winkle, a man living in pre- and post-Revolutionary America, and Anton Rosicky, an immigrant farmer in Nebraska, appear vastly different at first glance—Rip is idle and escapist; Rosicky is responsible and kind. However, upon deeper exploration, they reveal striking similarities. Both men are defined by their relationships with others, driven by a desire for freedom and simplicity, and shaped by the challenges life presents. Through their connections with others, their underlying adventurousness, and the trials they face, Rip Van Winkle and Anton Rosicky ultimately reflect a shared humanity despite their divergent paths.

Rip and Rosicky Compared

Relationship with Others
Both Rip Van Winkle and Anton Rosicky are characterized by their relationships, though the quality of these connections varies. Rip is well-liked by his neighbors and the children of his village, who admire his storytelling and good humor. Irving writes, “The children of the village… would shout with joy whenever he approached.” Despite this friendliness, Rip’s most significant relationship—his marriage—is defined by dysfunction. Dame Van Winkle is frequently portrayed as nagging and domineering, though it is clear that Rip’s habitual laziness and refusal to care for his own household responsibilities contribute to the strain. His preference for spending time with others over engaging in domestic duties suggests an avoidance of meaningful accountability.

In contrast, Rosicky’s relationships are deeply rooted in affection and responsibility. He is a devoted husband and father who finds joy in caring for his family. Unlike Rip, who avoids conflict and labor, Rosicky willingly sacrifices his comfort to ensure the well-being of his children and wife. Cather writes, “He was not a rich man, but he had a happy life, and he had made a happy life for others.” His bond with his daughter-in-law, Mary, is particularly touching, as he shows empathy for her and subtly encourages kindness and harmony in her marriage. While Rip is remembered fondly only because he outlived his critics, Rosicky earns admiration through love and service

June 25, 2025
June 25, 2025

Healthcare QI Career Reflection

Think about the next step in your career. This might be a specific job you are looking for in the field you are studying or a specific healthcare organization for which you aspire to work. Look for a job in your intended field that includes at least one of the strategies described in the section “Common Quality Improvement Strategies”: TQM, MFI, Six Sigma, Lean. Answer the following questions about that job:

Healthcare QI Career Reflection

What is the title of the position?

What credentials or trainings are listed as “must-haves” in the job description?, What are additional “nice-to-haves” or optional skills?,

From the job description can you tell how this role performs on a QI team?,

From the job description can you tell how this role collaborates with colleagues in other disciplines?,

Thinking about this job spend 90 seconds brainstorming on the following three questions:,

How would you choose which of the four QI strategies to use in the workplace?

Under what circumstances might you opt for one of the other three or some other strategy instead of the one you chose?

Healthcare QI Career Reflection

If you were on the job tomorrow, how would you learn more about that strategy to use it at work?

In your previous work and school life, think about a team that you have been a part of. It could be a sports team, a group project for a class, a work team, or another situation in which you collaborated with people to achieve a goal. Answer the following questions:

What are three key features about your team that helped you achieve your goal?

Or, if you did not achieve your goal, what are at least two barriers your team encountered that prevented you from achieving your goal?

What else would you have wanted or needed to help your team achieve its goal, or to make the process of achieving your goal smoother?

If you were to be on the job you chose at the beginning of this exercise tomorrow, how would you bring what you learned from this team experience to that job?

Healthcare QI Career Reflection

June 25, 2025
June 25, 2025

Socratic Irony and Determinism

To receive full points your response must thoroughly address the question; avoid vague or excessively brief responses. Single sentence answers will not receive points. Use a large language model (AI) at your own peril.

Socratic Irony and Determinism

1. Explain the meaning of “Socratic Irony”. What is ironic about Socrates’ “wisdom”? How does this reflect his approach to philosophical questions; i.e. his method?

Draw out the argument for determinism. Why do determinists deny the existence of human freedom? Explain how this complicates, or altogether undermines, the possibility of ethics.

Socratic Irony and Determinism

  1. What is “Socratic Irony”?,

  2. Why is Socrates’ “wisdom” considered ironic?,

  3. How does Socratic irony reflect Socrates’ philosophical method?,

  4. What is the argument for determinism?,

  5. Why does determinism challenge the existence of ethics and human freedom?


Comprehensive General Answer:

1. Socratic Irony – Meaning and Significance

“Socratic irony” refers to Socrates’ practice of pretending to be ignorant or humble in knowledge, especially in conversations with those who believed they were wise. The irony lies in the fact that Socrates often knew more—or at least, knew how little anyone truly knew—yet he acted as if he were the one seeking instruction. He would ask probing, innocent-sounding questions that ultimately exposed contradictions or gaps in his interlocutor’s reasoning.

The ironic aspect of Socrates’ “wisdom” is that he was considered the wisest man in Athens (according to the Oracle at Delphi) because he acknowledged his ignorance. Unlike others, Socrates did not claim to have definitive knowledge. This humility, or intellectual honesty, was itself a kind of wisdom: the recognition that true understanding begins with admitting what we do not know.

This irony is central to Socrates’ method, known as the Socratic Method. His approach involved asking a series of guided questions to help others clarify their beliefs and often realize their own inconsistencies. Rather than lecturing or giving answers, Socrates guided people toward self-examination and critical thinking. This dialectical approach aimed to dismantle false assumptions and uncover deeper truths, not by providing ready-made conclusions but by stimulating philosophical inquiry.


2. The Determinist Argument and Its Ethical Implications

Determinism is the philosophical position that every event—including human thoughts, decisions, and actions—is caused by prior events in accordance with the laws of nature. Determinists argue that the universe operates under a set of physical laws, and given a particular set of initial conditions, only one future is possible. This includes human behavior, which is seen as the result of genetics, environment, upbringing, and prior experiences.

The core argument for determinism often draws on physics and neuroscience. For example, if the brain is a physical system and physical systems obey natural laws, then all our decisions are outcomes of those laws. Free will, then, is an illusion—we may feel like we choose freely, but in fact, our choices are simply the result of preceding causes beyond our control.

Socratic Irony and Determinism

This position challenges the idea of human freedom, which is often thought to be a requirement for moral responsibility. If our choices are predetermined, then how can we be held morally accountable for our actions? Ethics traditionally assumes that people have the freedom to choose right or wrong. If determinism is true, then ethical praise or blame may not be justified. Instead of asking whether a person should have done something differently, we might instead ask what caused them to act that way.

June 25, 2025
June 25, 2025

Free Will vs. Determinism

To that end, please begin your post with the following statements:

”I have not used AI to write any part of this post for me. I would not do that, because I am not a dishonest person.”

I will deduct 10 points if these statements are missing from your post.

 Free Will vs. Determinism

With that being said, reflect on this quote from Albert Einstein:

 

“Everything is determined, the beginning as well as the end, by forces over which we have no control.”

 

Einstein did not believe that the laws of physics left anything to chance. Instead, he claimed that everything is determined, so that what happens now is the inevitable result of events that took place billions of years ago.

 

Now consider this claim:

Free Will vs. Determinism

Even if Einstein is right and everything is determined by the past, we still have free will.

 

In your initial post, please address the following:

1. On a scale of 0-10, how confident are you that this claim is true? To be clear, I am not asking you if you think Einstein was right about everything being determined. I am asking whether we could still have free will if we assume Einstein was right. Please bear in mind that a 0 expresses absolute confidence that this claim is false and a 10 expresses absolute confidence that this claim is true. If you are absolutely confident, then you have no doubt at all that you are right. Here is one way to think about that. If I am absolutely confident in my belief, then it makes sense for me to be willing to bet anything and everything that I am right. So absolute confidence means I think it would be sensible to bet my life and the life of everyone I love to gain a single dollar, because I think there is no chance that I am wrong.

2. Please explain what led you to this level of confidence. Please be sure to include a story about how your experience has influenced your confidence, and remember your Perspectives lessons. Your story should be a  HIT. Stories should be honest, important, and to the point, but you don’t need to have firsthand experience with something to share a personal story about how your experience has shaped your belief.

3. Think about and explain why somebody else might not share your level of confidence.

4. Reflecting on why somebody else might disagree, do you think a different level of confidence might be reasonable? Please be explicit on this point, and explain why or why not. Remember, even if you can understand why somebody might disgaree, that does not imply that you found their belief reasonable.

Your initial post should be at least 300 words.

After your initial post, please select another student with a significantly different perspective. Reply to that student’s post with a summary of their view that fully and accurately captures their perspective. The purpose of the reply is to show that you have a detailed understanding of a different perspective from your own. In your reply, avoid expressing your views and trying to debate or persuade. You should only focus on what the other student thinks, not what you believe or what you agree with. Your reply should be at least 150 words.

👮‍♂️ To prevent plagiarism, you will not be allowed to see other posts until after you have posted, and you will not be allowed to edit your post afterward. If you try to get a chance to see other posts before posting your answer by submitting a non-answer such as single period mark, I will grade that as your answer.  Also please recall that you are not allowed to use AI to write your posts or reply. 

Free Will vs. Determinism

Discussion Board Grading Criteria

Your grade will be based on the following criteria:,

1. Initial post is at least 300 words.,

2. Initial post provides a scored confidence level and a thoughtful and clear explanation of what led you to this level of confidence including a HIT story.,

3. Initial post includes a thoughtful and clear explanation of why somebody else may not share this level of confidence.,

4. Initial post provides a thoughtful and clear explanation of whether a different level of confidence might also be reasonable.,

5. Reply is at least 150 words.

6. Reply provides a clear and complete summary of a significantly different perspective from another student and avoids discussing your own views and trying to debate or persuade.

June 25, 2025
June 25, 2025

Supply Chain Resilience

How have your perspectives changed as we complete this course? We have read about lessons learned in managing supply risk and we have content that considers the future direction in SCRM. What steps do you think companies should be taking to become more resilient while also being profitable and competitive in the marketplace?

Supply Chain Resilience

  1. How have your perspectives changed during this course?,

  2. What lessons were learned about managing supply risk?,

  3. What is the future direction of Supply Chain Risk Management (SCRM)?,

  4. What steps can companies take to become more resilient?,

  5. How can companies stay profitable and competitive while building resilience?

Supply Chain Resilience


Comprehensive General Answer:

Throughout the course, my perspectives on supply chain management have evolved significantly. Initially, I viewed supply chains as mostly logistical functions—focused on efficiency and cost-saving. However, I now understand that resilience, flexibility, and risk mitigation are equally critical. The growing complexities and global interdependencies in supply chains make them more vulnerable to disruptions, whether due to geopolitical issues, pandemics, natural disasters, or cyber threats.

Key lessons learned about managing supply risk include the importance of proactive risk identification, supplier diversification, and transparency across the supply chain. Strategies such as mapping the entire supply chain, conducting regular risk assessments, and developing contingency plans are now seen as essential. Additionally, fostering strong relationships with suppliers can help ensure better communication and quicker recovery during disruptions.

Looking ahead, the future of SCRM will likely center around digital transformation, predictive analytics, and sustainability. Technologies like AI, blockchain, and IoT will play a significant role in enabling real-time monitoring, early warning systems, and data-driven decision-making. There will also be a stronger emphasis on ethical sourcing, environmental impact, and social responsibility.

To become more resilient while remaining profitable and competitive, companies should:

  1. Invest in technology to enhance visibility and analytics across the supply chain.

  2. Diversify suppliers and sourcing locations to reduce dependency on any single source.

  3. Build agile operations capable of quickly adapting to changing conditions.

  4. Implement scenario planning and simulation to prepare for various disruption events.

  5. Focus on long-term value rather than short-term cost-cutting, integrating sustainability and risk into strategic planning.

Supply Chain Resilience

June 24, 2025
June 24, 2025

Task Difficulty Reflection

describe a time when you struggled to perform a task at work. What was the job task? Using the PDC-HS, what questions would you have responded to with a no? If you were your supervisor, what would you have changed in your environment in order to help you perform better?

Task Difficulty Reflection

Remember to review the Reflection Paper rubric and instructions for reviewing a peer’s submission in the Important Course Information module.

Additionally, please include LINKS or DOIs to any articles or books referenced outside of the assigned readings as part of your APA citation (as is required when using web-based referencesLinks to an external site.). Failing to do so will result in point deductions.

Task Difficulty Reflection

  1. What was the job task you struggled with?,

  2. What specific aspect of the task made it difficult?,

  3. Which questions from the PDC-HS would you answer “no” to?,

  4. If you were the supervisor  what changes would you make?,

  5. What external sources support your reflection?


Comprehensive General Response:

Struggling with a Work Task

A time I struggled to perform a task at work involved completing monthly financial reports under a tight deadline during a staff shortage. The task required inputting and reconciling large amounts of data from multiple departments and formatting them according to internal reporting standards. With limited support and increased pressure, I made several errors that delayed the submission.


Applying the PDC-HS (Performance Diagnostic Checklist – Human Services)

The PDC-HS is a behavior-analytic tool designed to identify barriers to employee performance. Reflecting on that situation, the following questions from the PDC-HS would have been answered with a “no”:

  1. Was the task clearly explained and modeled?
    No. The expectations for the format and content were vague, and I received minimal onboarding specific to this reporting process.

  2. Did I receive timely and specific feedback on performance?
    No. Feedback was either delayed until errors were found or generalized rather than focused on how to improve the task process.

  3. Were necessary materials and resources available to complete the task?
    No. I lacked access to one of the key department’s databases, which slowed down data retrieval and verification.

  4. Was there adequate staffing support to meet expectations?
    No. The team was operating understaffed due to turnover and no interim support was provided.

  5. Were consequences (praise, recognition, support) in place for accurate task completion?
    No. Performance went largely unnoticed unless errors were made, discouraging proactive problem-solving.


Environmental Changes as a Supervisor

Struggling with a Work Task

If I had been the supervisor at the time, I would have taken the following steps to improve task performance:

  • Clarify expectations: Develop a clear reporting SOP (standard operating procedure) with step-by-step instructions and examples of completed reports.

  • Provide timely feedback: Set up short review sessions before the report deadline to review sections progressively and give corrective feedback early.

  • Ensure access to resources: Verify that all necessary tools, logins, and interdepartmental data sources were accessible to reporting staff.

  • Balance workloads: Redistribute tasks or bring in temporary support during known crunch periods to prevent overload.

  • Reinforce successful performance: Recognize staff who submit accurate reports on time with public acknowledgment or small incentives.

These changes align with principles from performance management literature emphasizing clarity, reinforcement, and environmental supports (Daniels & Bailey, 2014).


Conclusion and Scholarly Support

In high-demand environments, even experienced staff may struggle without the proper conditions for performance. The PDC-HS helps identify environmental and managerial gaps. Creating a supportive, well-resourced, and feedback-rich environment not only improves outcomes but also increases staff morale and accountability.