Hi, How Can We Help You?
  • Address: 1251 Lake Forest Drive New York
  • Email Address: assignmenthelpcentral@gmail.com

Blog

January 22, 2025
January 22, 2025

Subject:   Social Justice and Multicultural

You will write an article review, relevant to this week’s learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases.

Social Justice and Multicultural

The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points.  The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

Reference.Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:

  • A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem)
  • The literature review is current (generally, articles within the past 5 years)
  • A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don’t know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer
  • The purpose of the present study
  • The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.
  • State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?,
  • What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?,
  • Why was it important to publish these ideas?,

Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:

  • The participants and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).
  • The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study
  • A description of thetools/measuresused and research design employed.
  • A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:

  • Specific demographic characteristics of the sample
  • A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses
  • If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?
  • If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted “stand alone” (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

Discussion. The discussion is where the author “wraps up the research”. This section should include:

  • A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found
  • Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?
  • A discussion of how the author’s findings compares to those found in prior research
  • The limitations of the study
  • The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

Critique.

In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about your impressionsand the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

    • Were the findings important to a reader?,
    • Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?,
    • If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?,

Conclusion.

Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

APA Format Review

January 22, 2025
January 22, 2025

Emerging Technology Proposal Plan

In today’s ever-changing world of technology, organizations must compete to offer better products and services. Organizations look for new technologies to help them be more efficient and gain market share. Emerging technologies are innovations that are new or the most modern for the field or industry. They may also be considered groundbreaking or disrupt the way businesses traditionally operate.

Emerging Technology Proposal Plan

For this assessment, you will choose one of the attached case studies, each of which presents the existing technology and needs of a fictional organization. You will propose a technology product that will benefit the organization in the chosen case study and discuss how the technology would affect the organization if it moves forward with your proposal. Emerging Technology Proposal Plan

Requirements

Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. A similarity report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide. Emerging Technology Proposal Plan

You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course. Emerging Technology Proposal Plan

Tasks may not be submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc., unless specified in the task requirements. All other submissions must be file types that are uploaded and submitted as attachments (e.g., .docx, .pdf, .ppt).

  1. Summarize an organizational need from either the attached TechFite Case Study or the ElectraMovers Case Study including the scope of the need.,
  2. Propose a technology product that has launched within the last four years that addresses the organizational need from part A. Include a citation from a credible industry source.,
  3. Explain how the proposed product meets the organizational need identified in part A.,
  4. Explain the steps for adoption you would recommend the organization take to integrate the new technology product. Use the Gartner STREET process.,
  1. Describe why each step of the adoption process is necessary and how each step relates to the organization.,
  2. Describe one positive and one negative effect your technology product could have on the people or current processes in the organization.,
  3. Describe two strategies to address the negative effect.,
  4. Compare your technology product to an alternative technology product, including two advantages and two disadvantages that each technology product may have for the organization.

Note: The alternative technology product can be older than four years.

  1. Create a plan that can be used by the organization to determine whether the adoption of the proposed technology product successfully addresses the organizational need from part A by doing the following:
  • Recommend a specific time frame for evaluation.
  • Describe two measurable criteria the organization can use to evaluate the outcome of adopting the proposed technology.
  • Explain how the organization will use both measurable criteria to determine whether adopting the proposed technology has successfully addressed the organizational need.
  1. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
  2. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.

https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/7939

 

https://cgp-oex.wgu.edu/lti_provider/courses/course-v1:WGUx+C850x+2021_T3/block-v1:WGUx+C850x+2021_T3+type@vertical+block@1bf906388c934ac6bcb305a895c95c6a

January 22, 2025
January 22, 2025

Unethical Human Subject Research

Please I am struggling to find experiments conducted in the United States that were unethical human subject research studies from 2005 to present.

Unethical Human Subject Research

Briefly describe the research. (limit 1 paragraph)  Be sure to include a description:

  • Description of the subject population
  • time period during which the research was conducted
  • researcher’s rationale for performing the study(ies)
  • sponsor or funding source if applicable.,
  • Provide link for the selected study (make sure you list that in your references).,
  • Comment on the cultural climate at the time of the research (i.e. patriarchal society Cold War etc.) and any influence it may have had on the research/researcher(s) (limit 1 paragraph) .,
  • Identify the ethical issues with the research and describe whether it was compliant or non-compliant with at least two (2) of the codes declarations or other ethical guidance identified in this module’s readings. (limit 1 paragraph) ,
  • Include whether or not the code declaration or guidance was in effect at the time of the research and discuss whether change(s) could have been made to the research to make it compliant or more compliant. (limit 1 paragraph).,

citation in APA format. Willing to pay more Unethical U.S. Human Experiments

Please I am struggling to find experiments conducted in the United States that were unethical human subject research studies from 2005 to present.

Briefly describe the research. (limit 1 paragraph)  Be sure to include a description: Unethical U.S. Human Experiments

  • Description of the subject population
  • time period during which the research was conducted
  • researcher’s rationale for performing the study(ies)
  • sponsor or funding source, if applicable
  • Provide link for the selected study (make sure you list that in your references)
  • Comment on the cultural climate at the time of the research (i.e., patriarchal society, Cold War, etc.) and any influence it may have had on the research/researcher(s) (limit 1 paragraph) Unethical U.S. Human Experiments
  • Identify the ethical issues with the research and describe whether it was compliant or non-compliant with at least two (2) of the codes, declarations, or other ethical guidance identified in this module’s readings. (limit 1 paragraph)
  • Include whether or not the code, declaration or guidance was in effect at the time of the research and discuss whether change(s) could have been made to the research to make it compliant or more compliant. (limit 1 paragraph) Unethical U.S. Human Experiments

citation in APA format. Willing to pay more

January 22, 2025
January 22, 2025

Risk Analysis Research

For this project, you will continue your research from Project #1 by reviewing and then analyzing your chosen company’s risk statements as published each year in the company’s Annual Report to Investors (also published in the company’s annual filing of SEC Form 10-K).

Risk Analysis Research

After analyzing the company’s IT operations and its risk statements about those activities, You will construct and document your own IT focused risk analysis including both its primary operations and all supporting business processes., Your risk analysis will also address information risks and technology risks which you identify in your research about the company.,

Note: before beginning this assignment you should review NIST SP 800-30 R1: Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments., Pay special attention to Appendix D: “Threat Sources: Taxonomy of Threats Sources Capable of Initiating Threat Events”, and Appendix H: “Impact: Effects of Threat Events on Organizations, Individuals, and the Nation.”

For this project, you will continue your research from Project #1 by reviewing and then analyzing your chosen company’s risk statements as published each year in the company’s Annual Report to Investors (also published in the company’s annual filing of SEC Form 10-K). After analyzing the company’s IT operations and its risk statements about those activities, you will construct and document your own IT focused risk analysis including both its primary operations and all supporting business processes. Your risk analysis will also address information risks and technology risks which you identify in your research about the company.

Note: before beginning this assignment, you should review NIST SP 800-30 R1: Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments. Pay special attention to Appendix D: “Threat Sources: Taxonomy of Threats Sources Capable of Initiating Threat Events” and Appendix H: “Impact: Effects of Threat Events on Organizations, Individuals, and the Nation.”

For this project, you will continue your research from Project #1 by reviewing and then analyzing your chosen company’s risk statements as published each year in the company’s Annual Report to Investors (also published in the company’s annual filing of SEC Form 10-K). After analyzing the company’s IT operations and its risk statements about those activities, you will construct and document your own IT focused risk analysis including both its primary operations and all supporting business processes. Your risk analysis will also address information risks and technology risks which you identify in your research about the company.

Note: before beginning this assignment, you should review NIST SP 800-30 R1: Guide for Conducting Risk Assessments. Pay special attention to Appendix D: “Threat Sources: Taxonomy of Threats Sources Capable of Initiating Threat Events” and Appendix H: “Impact: Effects of Threat Events on Organizations, Individuals, and the Nation.”

January 22, 2025
January 22, 2025

Clue Sorting Activity

Task

  1. In this assignment you will implement a clue sort activity one-on-one with two different children, preferably a preschooler (ages 3-4) and an early elementary child (ages 5-7). Be sure to completely follow the instructions for the activity.
  2. The assignment is broken into four sections: 1) Materials, Procedure, and Evaluation, 2) Activity Summary, 3) Reflective Thoughts, and 4) Decision Making.

Clue Sorting Activity

Section 1: Materials, Procedure, and Evaluation

Materials: 20 to 25 objects (or pictures of objects or cutouts) that can be grouped into several possible groups according to criteria such as color, shape, size, or category (for example, animals, plants, furniture, clothing, or toys).

Procedure: Set all the objects in front of the child in a random arrangement. Try the following types of prompts.

  1. “Find some things that are [name a specific color, shape, size, material, pattern, function, or class].”
  2. Hold up one object, picture, or cutout; say, “Find some things that belong with this.” After the choices are made, ask, “Why do these things belong together?”

Evaluation: Note whether the child makes a conventional logical group and provides a conventional logical reason such as “because they are cars”, “they are all green”, “you can eat with them.” Or do they have a creative reason that is logical to the child if not to the adult; for example: “I would like them”, “They all have points”, or “I like these colors, but I don’t like those.”

Activity Summary

The activity summary should include the following information in paragraph format.

  • A list the specific materials used in the activity.,
  • What happened during the implementation?, What did you do and say?, What did the children do and say?,
  • Compare the two children’s behaviors and skills; give the ages of the children.,
  • Include as much detail as possible and note children’s responses both positive and negative.,

Reflective Thoughts

Think of this section as “talking out loud.”

Think about what your expectation was for the activity vs. what actually happened. Was the expectation(s) met? Ask yourself why? Analyze your activity and try to figure out what went wrong or why something worked so well.

Write some of your reflective thoughts and then describe what you learned about mathematics and young children by doing this activity.

Decision Making

After summarizing, inquiring, and analyzing your activity, you will come to some decisions about changes you want to make. Address each question:

  • How will you implement the activity differently next time?
  • How will you meet the needs of all children in the class?
  • How can you apply what you learned from the experience?
January 22, 2025
January 22, 2025

AI in Criminal Justice

There are many ways the criminal justice system can harness the power of cutting-edge technology and artificial intelligence (AI). Picture a probation officer equipped with AI tools assessing a recently released individual’s risk of reoffending, law enforcement quickly apprehending a fleeing thief using facial recognition, or a prison correctional officer using advanced inmate management systems to monitor security risks.

AI in Criminal Justice

In this assignment you’ll explore how AI impacts the criminal justice system and examine specific AI technologies used within it., This will demonstrate your understanding of the importance of using technology and AI in the criminal justice system and your ability to analyze their applications effectively.,

Preparation

Download the Week 3 Assignment Template Download Week 3 Assignment Templateand use it to complete this assignment.

Instructions

Please fill in the provided template with the following:

  1. Examine how AI technology is currently used in the criminal justice system for each of the following: predictive policing recidivism risk prediction facial recognition and data analytics.,
  2. Summarize the current use of one specific AI technology in each of the following sectors: law enforcement private security courts and corrections.,
    • Please pick technologies for this part that you haven’t already discussed in this assignment.,
    • Examples of job positions where these technologies might be utilized include:
      • Law Enforcement: Police officers, investigators, or parole officers.
      • Private Security: Security guards, loss prevention specialists, or bodyguards.
      • Courts: Probation officers.
      • Corrections: Correctional officers.
  3. Cite at least three credible sources, in proper SWS style, to support your research.

For assistance with SWS writing style, please visit:

Please refer to the Library site for additional support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:

  • Examine criminal justice technologies that aid data-informed decision making and its impact on crime.
January 22, 2025
January 22, 2025

Article Review Study

You will write an article review, relevant to this week’s learning module and readings. You will select the article yourself by searching the UWA Library Databases.

Article Review Study

The article you choose should be a research article (has a hypothesis that is empirically tested). Pick an article relevant to a topic covered in the weekly readings. Each review is worth 20 points.  The review should be 1-2 single-spaced pages in a 12-point font. It is in your best interest to submit your review before it is due so you may check your originality report and correct any spelling and grammatical errors identified by the software program.

The purpose of the review is to provide students knowledge of how research is conducted and reported. The main part of your review needs to include the following information. Please comment on these aspects of the article as part of your review. Provide only the briefest summary of content. What I am most interested in is your critique and connection to weekly readings.

Reference.Listed at the top of the paper in APA style.

Introduction. Read the introduction carefully. The introduction should contain:

  • A thorough literature review that establishes the nature of the problem to be addressed in the present study (the literature review is specific to the problem).,
  • The literature review is current (generally articles within the past 5 years).,
  • A logical sequence from what we know (the literature review) to what we don’t know (the unanswered questions raised by the review and what this study intended to answer.,
  • The purpose of the present study
  • The specific hypotheses/research questions to be addressed.,
  • State the overall purpose of the paper. What was the main theme of the paper?,
  • What new ideas or information were communicated in the paper?,
  • Why was it important to publish these ideas?,

Methods. The methods section has three subsections. The methods sections should contain:

  • The participants and the population they are intended to represent (are they described as well in terms of relevant demographic characteristics such as age, gender, ethnicity, education level, income level, etc?).
  • The number of participants and how the participants were selected for the study
  • A description of the tools/measuresused and research design employed.
  • A detailed description of the procedures of the study including participant instructions and whether incentives were given.

Results. The results section should contain a very thorough summary of results of all analyses. This section should include:

  • Specific demographic characteristics of the sample
  • A thorough narrative description of the results of all statistical tests that addressed specific hypotheses
  • If there are tables and figures, are they also described in the text?
  • If there are tables and figures, can they be interpreted “stand alone” (this means that they contain sufficient information in the title and footnotes so that a reader can understand what is being presented without having to go back to the text)?

Discussion. The discussion is where the author “wraps up the research”. This section should include:

  • A simple and easy to understand summary of what was found
  • Where the hypotheses supported or refuted?
  • A discussion of how the author’s findings compares to those found in prior research
  • The limitations of the study
  • The implications of the findings to basic and applied researchers and to practitioners

Critique.

In your opinion, what were the strengths and weaknesses of the paper or document? Be sure to think about your impressionsand the reasons for them. Listing what the author wrote as limitations is not the same thing as forming your own opinions and justifying them to the reader.

  • Were the findings important to a reader?
  • Were the conclusions valid? Do you agree with the conclusions?
  • If the material was technical, was the technical material innovative?

Conclusion.

Once you provide the main critique of the article, you should include a final paragraph that gives me your overall impression of the study. Was the study worthwhile? Was it well-written and clear to those who may not have as much background in the content area? What was the overall contribution of this study to our child development knowledge base?

APA Format Review

If you are unfamiliar or a bit “rusty” on your APA format, you may want to use the tutorial available through the APA website which is listed on your syllabus.

Grading Criteria

I will grade your paper based upon:

  • How well you followed directions (as indicated in this page)
  • How thoroughly you used examples to support the critique
  • How accurately you used APA format
  • your organization, grammar, and spelling
  • Integration of assigned weekly readings
January 22, 2025
January 22, 2025

Module II: Diabetes/Endocrine Topic Discussion

Must post first.

Subscribe

Often we see a great deal of misinformation in the care of patients with diabetes, and often this misinformation is centered around the role and choice of medications.

Diabetes/Endocrine Topic Discussion

Many patients, especially newly diagnosed patients, are prescribed medications that do not fit into the scheme of the ADA / AACE guidelines / best evidence based practices – for instance, starting on Januvia (sitagliptin) or Rybelsus (semaglutide)  as initial monotherapy without a compelling indication or reason.

In this discussion please talk about how patients get put on these medications and why/how they should be transitioned to more evidence based treatments.,

    • Is it okay to start a patient on a drug (particularly an oral drug) other than metformin as an initial drug?,  Please cite possible circumstances where this could be reasonable.,
    • What anti-diabetic medications have compelling evidence for use in select populations possibly as initial therapy?,
      • (eg. SGLT2Is – Patients with type 2 diabetes and a high risk of cardiovascular disease had reduced risk of a cardiovascular death nonfatal myocardial infarction or nonfatal stroke relative to those randomized to receive placebo),
    • What additional medications other than those for glucose control  should be included in a comprehensive pharmacotherapeutic plan and why?, [See textbook section on Treatment of Concomitant Conditions]

Now let’s consider the following case about thyroid disorders. A 69-year-old man goes to his family doctor because he has been feeling fatigued and lethargic. His doctor does a complete evaluation., This patient had a myocardial infarction and has a recurrent ventricular arrhythmia (treated with amiodarone). The patient’s TSH is elevated and his T4 is slightly decreased.

  • Please provide an evaluation of this patient’s condition, approach to therapy and factors you have taken into consideration

Submit  your completed responses, [MS Word document or equivalent] to the Assignment folder “Discussion Post Originality Check”  for Turnitin similarity checking. Click on the ‘Assignments’ link in the course navigation bar to locate the assignment folder. You are required to achieve an acceptable similarity score before posting to the discussion board.  See the Course Resources module’s subfolder ‘Turnitin’ for policy and algorithm (acceptable score) details. 

Discussion posts placed on D2L prior to Monday morning at 12:01 AM ET are not graded. Post your initial response by Thursday at midnight. Respond to at least one student by Saturday at midnight. Students are encouraged to respond to more than just the 1 required post to promote an engaging classroom experience. Both responses should be a minimum of 250 words, scholarly written, APA formatted, and referenced.  A minimum of 2 references are required (one may be the textbook). Refer to the Grading Rubric for Online Discussion in the Course Resource section.

January 22, 2025
January 22, 2025

Criminal Justice Research Proposal

Assignment #1

***Something related to Criminal Justice******

You are required to write a research proposal that covers an introduction, literature review, and methods section. For this assignment, you will formulate a research question and hypothesis and reviews relevant literature and develop a research design to address research questions.

Criminal Justice Research Proposal

I have divided this project into four assignments. In the first part, which is due this week, you will write your own introduction section including the introducing the topic, the importance of investigating the topic, and the major question that you are trying to answer.

**Make sure to identify a topic, explain different aspects of it, explain what you are going to focus on, and why do you think it is an important topic. At the end clearly mention your research question.

Assignment #2

Consider the possible relationship between education and prejudice. Discuss how this relationship might be examined. Discuss how you might narrow the topic to one that could be researched.

150 words

Assignment #1

***Something related to Criminal Justice******

You are required to write a research proposal that covers an introduction literature review and methods section., For this assignment you will formulate a research question and hypothesis and reviews relevant literature and develop a research design to address research questions., I have divided this project into four assignments., In the first part which is due this week you will write your own introduction section including the introducing the topic the importance of investigating the topic and the major question that you are trying to answer.,

**Make sure to identify a topic explain different aspects of it explain what you are going to focus on and why do you think it is an important topic., At the end clearly mention your research question.

Assignment #2

Consider the possible relationship between education and prejudice. Discuss how this relationship might be examined. Discuss how you might narrow the topic to one that could be researched.

150 words

January 22, 2025
January 22, 2025

Social Determinants of Health

Overview: Why does the zip code determine so much about an individual’s health?, What makes some people healthy and others unhealthy?, Healthy People 2030 explores questions such as these with a focus on social determinants of health. The Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion groups social determinants of health into 5 domains.

Social Determinants of Health

Instructions: Watch the 5-minute video “A Tale of Two Zip Codes” at https://youtu.be/Eu7d0BMRt0o. Next, continue your exploration of the Healthy People 2030 website and SDH at https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/social-determinants-health and relate each domain for the social determinants of health to the Healthy People 2030 objective you selected. Complete the following worksheet. Limit responses to 150 words or less.

My Healthy People 2030 objective: Increase the proportion of women who receives early and adequate prenatal care – MICH-08

How does economic stability impact your chosen Healthy People 2030 objective?,

How does education access and quality impact your chosen Healthy People 2030 objective?,

How does health care access and quality impact your chosen Healthy People 2030 objective?,

How does neighborhood and built environment impact your chosen Healthy People 2030 objective?,

How does social and community context impact your chosen Healthy People 2030 objective?,

References must be included.

Overview: Why does the zip code determine so much about an individual’s health? What makes some people healthy and others unhealthy? Healthy People 2030 explores questions such as these with a focus on SDH. The Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion groups into 5 domains.

Instructions: Watch the 5-minute video “A Tale of Two Zip Codes” at https://youtu.be/Eu7d0BMRt0o. Next, continue your exploration of the Healthy People 2030 website and social determinants of health at https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/social-determinants-health and relate each domain for the SDH to the Healthy People 2030 objective you selected. Complete the following worksheet. Limit responses to 150 words or less.

My Healthy People 2030 objective: Increase the proportion of women who receives early and adequate prenatal care – MICH-08

How does economic stability impact your chosen Healthy People 2030 objective?

How does education access and quality impact your chosen Healthy People 2030 objective?

How does health care access and quality impact your chosen Healthy People 2030 objective?

How does neighborhood and built environment impact your chosen Healthy People 2030 objective?

How does social and community context impact your chosen Healthy People 2030 objective?

References must be included.