Academic Wizard, Author at Assignment Help Central

January 26, 2025

Nurse Goals Planning

By Academic Wizard Blog

Nurse Goals Planning

Compose a 2-3 page paper to answer the following questions:

1. What specific actions can you take as an APN to assist in attaining two or more of the four goals in the plan?
2. What aspects of health information technology will assist you, or will be an obstacle, in your endeavors?
3. What changes are required in the four domains of nursing practice to accomplish these two goals? The four domains of nursing practice in the CARE model: Federal Health IT Strategic Plan_2020_2025compressed.pdf Download Federal Health IT Strategic Plan_2020_2025compressed.pdfClinical, Administration, Research, and Education (of nurses).
4. Review this infographic on the four goals for the 5-year period from the federal strategic plan (link to full document hereLinks to an external site.): Nurse Goals Planning

1. Compose a 2-3 page paper to answer the following questions,
  1. What specific actions can you take as an APN to assist in attaining two or more of the four goals in the plan? ,
  2. What aspects of health information technology will assist you or will be an obstacle in your endeavors?,
  3. What changes are required in the four domains of nursing practice to accomplish these two goals? The four domains of nursing practice in the CARE model: Federal Health IT Strategic, Plan_2020_2025compressed.pdf Download Federal Health IT Strategic, Plan_2020_2025compressed.pdfClinical Administration Research and Education (of nurses). ,
  4. Review this infographic on the four goals for the 5-year period from the federal strategic plan (link to full document hereLinks to an external site.): Nurse Goals Planning
  5. Compose a 2-3 page paper to answer the following questions:
Compose a 2-3 page paper to answer the following questions:
1. What specific actions can you take as an APN to assist in attaining two or more of the four goals in the plan?
2. What aspects of health information technology will assist you, or will be an obstacle, in your endeavors?
3. What changes are required in the four domains of nursing practice to accomplish these two goals? The four domains of nursing practice in the CARE model: Federal Health IT Strategic Plan_2020_2025compressed.pdf Download Federal Health IT Strategic Nurse Goals Planning Plan_2020_2025compressed.pdfClinical, Administration, Research, and Education (of nurses).
4. Review this infographic on the four goals for the 5-year period from the federal strategic plan (link to full document hereLinks to an external site.):

January 26, 2025

Harris Case Study

By Academic Wizard Blog

Harris Case Study

According to Harris explain the difference between ordinary human inquiry and social science.,
According to Harris what makes academic journal articles different from other types of published material (e.g. book chapters, news articles etc.)?,
According to Harris, what are some important things you should consider when critiquing how concepts are defined? Harris Case Study,
According to Harris what are some important things you should consider when critiquing a study’s research design?,

According to Harris what are some important things you should consider when critiquing sampling procedures?,
According to Allen and Sawhney (2019) and Giblin (2014) how can we define an “organization”?,
According to Allen and Sawhney (2019) how can we define “management”?,
According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), what is the difference between leadership and management?
According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), what are the similarities and differences between for-profit and nonprofit organizations? Harris Case Study
According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), what are the three primary components of the criminal justice system and what are some examples of organizations within each component?
According to Allen and Sawhney (2019), describe the three different approaches to explaining leadership?
According to Giblin (2014), why should we study criminal justice organizations?
According to Giblin (2014), identify and describe the four common components of formal organizations.
According to Giblin (2014), what is organizational theory?
According to Giblin (2014), what is organizational behavior?
According to Giblin (2014), why do individuals decide to organize?
According to Giblin (2014), what are some common goals shared by criminal justice actors despite the fact the system is supposed to be adversarial?
According to Giblin (2014), what are some key differences between public and private organizations?
According to Giblin (2014), what is organizational structure? Harris Case Study
According to Giblin (2014), what is vertical complexity and how is it assessed?
According to Giblin (2014), what is horizontal complexity and how does it relate to criminal justice organizations?
According to Giblin (2014), what is spacial complexity and how does it relate to criminal justice organizations?
According to Giblin (2014), what is formalization and how does it relate to criminal justice organizations?
According to Giblin (2014), what is centralization and how does it relate to criminal justice organizations?
According to Giblin (2014), what is span of control and how does it relate to criminal justice organizations?

NOTE: YOU MUST CITE THE BOOK AND PAGE NUMBER(S) FOR EACH ANSWER TO RECEIVE CREDIT FOR THE QUESTION. IF YOU DO NOT CITE THE BOOK AND PAGE NUMBER FOR EACH ANSWER, IT WILL BE MARKED AS INCORRECT.

January 26, 2025

Summary of Criminal Justice

By Academic Wizard Blog

Summary of Criminal Justice

You must submit a 3 page summary of the assigned readings from this week (approximately 1 page per article). This is not the appropriate place to discuss whether or not you enjoyed the material but is instead a means to assess whether or not you understood the material well enough to briefly summarize it.

In other words, do not make your own argument in the summary papers (you will do that on your exam), instead summarize the study or key arguments the author(s) is making.

Lambert, E. G., Paoline, E. A., & Hogan, N. L. (2006). The impact of centralization and formalization on correctional staff job satisfaction and organizational commitment: An exploratory study. Criminal Justice Studies, 19(1), 23–44. (Reading 1 in the Giblin Book) Summary of Criminal Justice
Armstrong, G. S., (2012). Factors to consider for optimal span of control in community supervision evidence-based practice environments. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 23(4), 427–446. (Reading 2 in the Giblin Book)
Benson, J. S., & Decker, S. H. (2010). The organizational structure of international drug smuggling. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(2), 130–138 (Reading 3 in the Giblin Book)

You must submit a 3 page summary of the assigned readings from this week (approximately 1 page per article)., This is not the appropriate place to discuss whether or not you enjoyed the material but is instead a means to assess whether or not you understood the material well enough to briefly summarize it., In other words do not make your own argument in the summary papers (you will do that on your exam),Instead summarize the study or key arguments the author(s) is making.,

Lambert, E. G., Paoline, E. A., & Hogan, N. L. (2006). The impact of centralization and formalization on correctional staff job satisfaction and organizational commitment:, An exploratory study. Criminal Justice Studies, 19(1), 23–44. (Reading 1 in the Giblin Book)
Armstrong, G. S., (2012). Factors to consider for optimal span of control in community supervision evidence-based practice environments. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 23(4), 427–446. (Reading 2 in the Giblin Book)
Benson, J. S., & Decker, S. H. (2010). The organizational structure of international drug smuggling. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(2), 130–138 (Reading 3 in the Giblin Book)

January 26, 2025

Psychiatric Case Study

By Academic Wizard Blog

Psychiatric Case Study

Present the full complex case study. Include chief complaint; history of present illness; any pertinent past psychiatric, substance use, medical, social, family history; most recent mental status exam; current psychiatric diagnosis including differentials that were ruled out; and plan for treatment and management.

Report normal diagnostic results as the name of the test and “normal” (rather than specific value). Abnormal results should be reported as a specific value.
Be succinct in your presentation, and do not exceed 8 minutes. Specifically address the following for the patient, using your SOAP note as a guide:
- Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis?, What is the duration and severity of their symptoms?, How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?,
- Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?,
- Assessment: Discuss their mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses?, Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses and why you chose them., List them from highest priority to lowest priority. What was your primary diagnosis, and why? Describe how your primary diagnosis aligns with DSM-5 diagnostic criteria and supported by the patient’s symptoms.
- Plan: In your video, describe your treatment plan using clinical practice guidelines supported by evidence-based practice. Include a discussion on your chosen FDA-approved psychopharmacologic agents and include alternative treatments available and supported by valid research. All treatment choices must have a discussion of your rationale for the choice supported by valid research. What were your follow-up plan and parameters? What referrals would you make or recommend as a result of this treatment session? Psychiatric Case Study
- In your written plan include all the above as well as include one social determinant of health according to the HealthyPeople 2030 (you will need to research) as applied to this case in the realm of psychiatry and mental health. As a future advanced provider, what are one health promotion activity and one patient education consideration for this patient for improving health disparities and inequities in the realm of psychiatry and mental health? Demonstrate your critical thinking.
- Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this patient if you could conduct the session over? If you are able to follow up with your patient, explain whether these interventions were successful and why or why not. If you were not able to conduct a follow up, discuss what your next intervention would be. Psychiatric Case Study

January 26, 2025

IRBs Case Study

By Academic Wizard Blog

IRBs Case Study

The Case: IRBs in Conflict you are presented with a case, please see below. Review the case and answer the following questions. Your answers can be bulleted.

In your introductory statement include your position on whether or not the IRB should approve the study. (5 points),
What are the ethical issues and points of conflict in this case? (15 points) (limit to 1 paragraph),
Who are the interested parties affected by the issues/conflicts and what are their reasonable expectations?, (5 points) (list and summarize the reasonable expectations)
Depending on on your position on whether or not the IRB should approve the study what would be the probable consequences?, REMEMBER: Consequences can be multifaceted. (10 points) (limit to 1 paragraph),

Researchers in a developing nation in South America (SA) have been studying a hereditary disorder found only in an isolated, indigenous population living deep in the jungle. They now hope they can identify the gene(s) that may be associated with the disorder in order to identify causative factors and to find interventions and targeted therapies. To accomplish this, they will need to collaborate with a qualified US researcher, Dr. Herod I. Tarry. Dr .Tarry is a world-renowned molecular biologist who is utilizing a genomic technology that is not widely available. The SA researchers would send subject blood samples to Dr. Tarry’s U.S. lab for testing. IRBs Case Study

The SA researchers submitted a protocol amendment to the South America Institutional Review Board (SAIRB), which is the IRB of record for the study. The protocol amendment added Dr. Tarry to the study team and added the genomic research. In addition, the SAIRB-approved informed consent form (ICF) was revised to include information about the blood draw for genomic analysis. The SA researchers’ revised protocol and consent form were approved by the SAIRB in compliance with South America’s research regulatory requirements.

Per his institution’s requirements, Dr. Tarry must get approval for his work on the international study from the institution’s IRB (Amazing IRB). Dr. Tarry submits the SAIRB-approved documents in a proposal to the Amazing IRB. Dr. Tarry is asked to present the SA hereditary disorder study at the next convened meeting for Amazing IRB. IRBs Case Study

The Amazing IRB members are not receptive to the proposal, in large part due to the perceived quality of the ICF. The SAIRB-approved ICF is a single-spaced, typed page (about 550 words). It includes a description of the study, the procedures (including the blood draw for genomic analysis), risks, benefits, and confidentiality protections. However, the details are more limited than the Amazing IRB usually sees. IRBs Case Study

While the consent technically meets all the required US regulatory elements for informed consent, the Amazing IRB members feel it is far below US standards for consent documents. Dr. Tarry acknowledges the consent document is not written like consents are in the US. He states he is not consenting subjects for this study and he will not have any contact with them. He points out to the IRB members that the consent document is acceptable by the SA research regulatory standards and he hopes the Amazing IRB will approve the study and the consent as is. In final comments, he notes his role in the research can be very beneficial to the study population and as such it is extremely important for him to participate in the genomic research.

Textbook: Emanuel, E. J. Grady, C. Crouch, Lei, R.K., Miller, F.G. and Wendler, D.
(2011) “The Oxford Textbook of Clinical Research Ethics”. ISBN: 9780199768639 (Book
must be purchased) N.B: 2008 version is also acceptable. Book is available has hard copy

January 26, 2025

Critical Thinking & Application Prompts

By Academic Wizard Blog

Module 1 Critical Thinking & Application Prompts (Sp25)

Instructions for Critical Thinking & Application Prompts:

Each week, you will be presented with a series of critical thinking and application prompts.

You will be directed to the applicable set of prompts by clicking the “Take the Quiz” button below. Prior to starting this assignment, be sure you have carefully reviewed all of the content referenced on the Learning Materials page (and any other pages associated with the module).

Each prompt is generally worthy of at least 250 words (2 – 3 well-written paragraphs) in response. Be sure to connect with (and informally cite in-text) the applicable readings / videos from the module’s learning materials.

A note on in-text citing and connecting with the learning materials: As a graduate student in a Master of Science degree program it’s very important that you offer perspectives and arguments that are grounded in theory and the scientific literature – NOT personal opinion or anecdotal evidence., I don’t want a works-cited page but I do want you to clearly cite your sources in-text for the various connections you’ll be making between the learning materials and your application thereof., For example one might write, “While I marveled at the uncanny ability of the psychic to tap into my true personality, the Barnum Effect (Aronson, Chapter 2) could have well explained my feelings…” Be sure to use these informal in-text citations to make your arguments and support your perspectives.,

ProTip: You may want to copy the essay questions into a Word doc (or similar) and compose your responses to the worksheet prompts offline., Then you can return to the quiz submission page to “copy and paste” your previously composed responses into the text box associated with each of the prompts., Once you have done that, you can click the “Submit the Quiz” button near the bottom of the screen in order to submit your essay questions for grading. The Critical Thinking & Application essay-based quizzes are set to “single attempt” which means you cannot return to the quiz page to make revisions – so please keep that in mind and only “submit” your quiz when you are satisfied with your work!

References

Aronson, E., & Aronson, J. (2018). The Social Animal. Worth Publishers, Macmillan

Learning.

January 26, 2025

Intersectionality in Sentencing Outcomes

By Academic Wizard Blog

Thesis Intersectionality in Sentencing Outcomes

Write a thesis using the table of contents (order of paper)Analyzing data collected from secondary data from a 10-year range 2010-2020 collecting data from Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission, Virginia Department of Corrections, and State Court System Databases.Explain the data (FINDINGS) analyzed and how it aligns with The Intersectionality TheoryAnalyze data researched (FINDINGS) using quantitative analysis method and inferential and descriptive statistics.Use Stratified sampling Use the table of contents to structure

Thesis Intersectionality in Sentencing Outcomes

ThesisII: Exploring systemic inequalities and the interplay of race gender and social class on sentencing outcomes in the state of Virginia.,Research Question: how do race social class and gender intersect to influence sentencing outcomes in the Virginia justice system?, Write a thesis using the table of contents (order of paper)Analyzing data collected from secondary data from a 10-year range 2010-2020 collecting data from Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission Virginia Department of Corrections and State Court System Databases.,Explain the data (FINDINGS) analyzed and how it aligns with The Intersectionality Theory,Analyze data researched (FINDINGS) using quantitative analysis method and inferential and descriptive statistics.,Use Stratified sampling Use the table of contents to structure

Thesis Intersectionality in Sentencing Outcomes

ThesisII: Exploring systemic inequalities and the interplay of race, gender, and social class on sentencing outcomes in the state of Virginia.Research Question: how do race, social class, and gender intersect to influence sentencing outcomes in the Virginia justice system?Write a thesis using the table of contents (order of paper)Analyzing data collected from secondary data from a 10-year range 2010-2020 collecting data from Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission, Virginia Department of Corrections, and State Court System Databases.Explain the data (FINDINGS) analyzed and how it aligns with The Intersectionality TheoryAnalyze data researched (FINDINGS) using quantitative analysis method and inferential and descriptive statistics.Use Stratified sampling Use the table of contents to structure

January 26, 2025

PepsiCo vs. Coca-Cola Analysis

By Academic Wizard Blog

PepsiCo vs. Coca-Cola Analysis

Your paper should be a minimum 4-page response not including the cover page and references. Using current literature, you will be looking at Pepsico Inc and Coca-Cola Co for the fiscal year ended 2015 and completing a variety of analysis on both of these companies. You will specifically be using:

Pepsico Inc 2015 annual report
Pepsico Inc 2015 10-K
Pepsico Inc 2015 Def 14A PepsiCo vs. Coca-Cola Analysis
CocaCola Co 2015 annual report
CocaCola Co 2015 2015 10-K
CocaCola Co 2015 Def 14A
What is the history of these companies their current business operating sectors and reportable segments?, What factors affect their profitability and this industry in general?,
Compare the nature of Pepsi’s history business sectors and reportable segments to those of Coca-Cola’s history?,
What is the purpose of Form Def 14A?, What does “Def” stand for? What types of information does a proxy contain?,
Who is the auditor for Pepsico? Who is the auditor for Coca-Cola?, What were the audit fees as a percentage of (1) total revenue, and (2) total assets? Audit fees were not always publicly disclosed. In fact, such disclosure became mandatory only since the year 2000 in the United States. Why is public disclosure of audit and other fees paid to the audit firm important? What do you think prompted this change in disclosure requirements? Do you believe the current standards are sufficient?
Both managements comment on the fact that internal control over financial reporting has “inherent limitations.” What are those inherent limitations? How does management obtain comfort that internal control does not contain any material weaknesses?
Go to the Coca Cola website. Go to the investors’ section and corporate governance and then “learn more about governance and ethics”. Under Ethics and Compliance, locate the “Code of Business Conduct” and review this. What are the main components of this code? Provide a critique of the components and overall message contained in the code. What guidelines are provided as to how deviations from the company’s code of ethics are handled? PepsiCo vs. Coca-Cola Analysis

Your paper should be a minimum 4-page response not including the cover page and references.

January 26, 2025

Theory Matrix

By Academic Wizard Blog

Theory Matrix

This theory matrix is a compilation of all the theories we’ll be covering this semester. It is a document for you to use throughout your graduate program. Add the information you feel is important to remember about each theory. Add images, charts, examples, etc. that will help you you in further understanding and research projects!

Suggested Format:

Name of Theory
Foundations: What is the vital info of this theory (terms, definitions, etc)
Scholars: Who are the major researchers
Research: Reference list of some of the articles and publications related to this model/theory (this might come from our readings or others you find)
Notes: Reflections or Thoughts as desired

Leadership Timeline:

1900- Great Man Theory
1930- Group Theory
1940- Trait Theory (Big 5)
1950- Behavioral Theory
1960- Contingency Theory
1970- Situational and Participative Transactional & Transformational
1980- Managerial
1990- Relationship
Today- Situational Leadership
- Servant Leadership
- Spiritual Leadership
- Adaptive Leadership
- Authentic Leadership
- Psychological Capital

**Many of the theories overlap each other. The lines are not clear-cut; they can be applied to each other to help understand the phenomenon., Don’t discard one theory for another one.

THEORY MATRIX

OGL 510

This theory matrix is a compilation of all the theories we’ll be covering this semester., It is a document for you to use throughout your graduate program., Add the information you feel is important to remember about each theory., Add images charts examples etc. that will help you you in further understanding and research projects!,

Suggested Format:

Name of Theory
Foundations: What is the vital info of this theory (terms, definitions, etc)
Scholars: Who are the major researchers
Research: Reference list of some of the articles and publications related to this model/theory (this might come from our readings or others you find)
Notes: Reflections or Thoughts as desired

Leadership Timeline:

1900- Great Man Theory
1930- Group Theory
1940- Trait Theory (Big 5)
1950- Behavioral Theory
1960- Contingency Theory
1970- Situational and Participative Transactional & Transformational
1980- Managerial
1990- Relationship
Today- Situational Leadership
- Servant Leadership
- Spiritual Leadership
- Adaptive Leadership
- Authentic Leadership
- Psychological Capital

**Many of the theories overlap each other. The lines are not clear-cut; they can be applied to each other to help understand the phenomenon. Don’t discard one theory for another one.

January 26, 2025

Research Proposal Topic

By Academic Wizard Blog

Name: Student from ED 504

Research Proposal Topic

ED 504 – Spring 2025

Problem statement: My identified classroom uses primarily independent work or homogeneous small groups for students to complete class assignments. In addition, it does not have a strong classroom culture and students do not engage with each other often.

In this classroom, student academic achievement is not as high as student achievement in other classrooms of the same grade level. Past studies have shown that heterogeneous groups have been shown to improve both classroom culture and student academic achievement. Research Proposal Topic

Best practice used to address your problem: I plan to integrate heterogeneous grouping into my identified classroom multiple times a week in place of individual work. This will enable different students in my class to work together, regardless of their level of achievement, which will improve the classroom culture and lead to improvements in academic achievement.

Hypothesis: Heterogeneous small groups will have a more positive impact on daily student academic achievement than homogeneous groups or independent work.

Study Population: The population I will be studying is my identified classroom. This is a seventh-grade general education English classroom with a diverse population of 25 students. These students represent multiple different ethnicities, genders, religions, social classes, and levels of academic achievement. Research Proposal Topic

5a. Independent Variable: The independent variable I will be changing during this study will be the format of grouping students., For three days a week students will be placed in heterogeneous groups for ten minutes., For one day students will be placed in homogeneous groups., For one day students will be given independent work (this can serve as the control variable).,

5b. Dependent Variable: The dependent variable I will be measuring in this study is student academic achievement., This will be measured by a pre-test at the beginning of the study, as well as a short “exit ticket” at the end of each day for three weeks. Each exit ticket will have three or four questions about the information learned in class that day. Students will complete the exit ticket individually.

Brief plan of action for executing your experimental design: I will begin by giving a pre-test to measure each student’s performance at the beginning of the study. This will enable me to properly assign groups with varying levels of student achievement in each group. Then, students will be placed in heterogeneous groups three times a week for ten minutes at a time. During the other two days, students will complete independent work or be placed in homogeneous groups. At the end of each day, students will complete a short exit ticket. This structure will continue for three weeks. At the end of the study, the exit tickets for each day will be compared to see if students perform better on the days they were placed in heterogeneous groups, homogeneous groups, or working independently.

Previous page 1 … 49 50 51 52 53 … 164 Next page

Author Archives: Academic Wizard